Showing posts with label Cardiomyopathy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cardiomyopathy. Show all posts

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Practice Essentials

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder that has a variable presentation and carries a high incidence of sudden death. Its hallmark is myocardial hypertrophy that is inappropriate and often asymmetrical and that occurs in the absence of an obvious inciting hypertrophic stimulus.

Essential update: Alcohol septal ablation reduces risk in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

In a recent observational cohort study of 470 patients with obstructive HCM, echo-contrast-guided alcohol septal ablation (ASA) was associated with a low incidence of sudden cardiac death and a reduced risk profile.

The 10-year survival rate after ASA was 88%, compared with 84% in a matched control population, and the 10-year survival free of sudden cardiac death rate was 95%. ASA reduced the prevalence of syncope, abnormal blood pressure response, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and maximal wall thickness ≥30 mm. The procedure also reduced the proportion of patients with 2 or more risk factors for sudden cardiac death from 25% to 8%.[8]

Signs and symptoms

Signs and symptoms of HCM can include the following:

Sudden cardiac death (the most devastating presenting manifestation)Dyspnea (the most common presenting symptom)Syncope and presyncopeAnginaPalpitationsOrthopnea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (early signs of congestive heart failure [CHF])CHF (relatively uncommon but sometimes seen)Dizziness

Physical findings may include the following:

Double apical impulse or triple apical impulse (less common)Normal first heart sound; second heart sound usually is normally split but is paradoxically split in some patients with severe outflow gradients; S3 gallop is common in children but signifies decompensated CHF in adults; S4 is frequently heard Jugular venous pulse revealing a prominent a waveDouble carotid arterial pulseApical precordial impulse that is displaced laterally and usually is abnormally forceful and enlargedSystolic ejection crescendo-decrescendo murmurHolosystolic murmur at the apex and axilla of mitral regurgitationDiastolic decrescendo murmur of aortic regurgitation (10% of patients)

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

No specific laboratory blood tests are required in the workup. Genetic testing is not yet widely available but is becoming increasingly so.

Two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography is diagnostic for HCM. Findings may be summarized as follows:

Abnormal systolic anterior leaflet motion of the mitral valveLeft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)Left atrial enlargementSmall ventricular chamber sizeSeptal hypertrophy with septal-to-free wall ratio greater than 1.4:1Mitral valve prolapse and mitral regurgitationDecreased midaortic flowPartial systolic closure of the aortic valve in midsystole

Other imaging modalities that may be useful include the following:

Chest radiographyRadionuclide imagingCardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Particularly useful when echocardiography is questionable, particularly with apical hypertrophy

Electrocardiographic findings may include the following:

ST-T wave abnormalities and LVH (common)Axis deviation (right or left)Conduction abnormalities (P-R prolongation, bundle-branch block)Sinus bradycardia with ectopic atrial rhythmAtrial enlargementAbnormal and prominent Q wave in the anterior precordial and lateral limb leads, short P-R interval with QRS suggestive of preexcitation, atrial fibrillation (poor prognostic sign), and a P-wave abnormality (all uncommon)

The following diagnostic modalities may also be useful:

Cardiac catheterization (to determine the degree of outflow obstruction, cardiac hemodynamics, the anatomy and diastolic characteristics of the left ventricle, and the coronary anatomy) Electrophysiologic studies

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Pharmacologic therapy for HCM may include the following:

Beta blockersCalcium channel blockersDiltiazem, amiodarone, and disopyramide (rarely)Antitussives to prevent coughing

The following caveats are warranted:

Avoid inotropic drugs if possibleAvoid nitrates and sympathomimetic amines, except in concomitant coronary artery diseaseAvoid digitalisUse diuretics with caution

Surgical and catheter-based therapeutic options include the following:

Left ventricular myomectomyMitral valve replacementPermanent pacemaker implantationCatheter septal ablationPlacement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image libraryHypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. NextBackground

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder that is typically inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion with variable penetrance and variable expressivity. The disease has complex symptomatology and potentially devastating consequences for patients and their families. (See Etiology and Prognosis.)[1]

The disorder has a variable presentation and carries a high incidence of sudden death. In fact, HCM is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in preadolescent and adolescent children. The hallmark of the disorder is myocardial hypertrophy that is inappropriate, often asymmetrical, and occurs in the absence of an obvious inciting hypertrophy stimulus. This hypertrophy can occur in any region of the left ventricle but frequently involves the interventricular septum, which results in an obstruction of flow through the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract. (See Prognosis, History, Physical Examination, and Workup.)

Decades ago, HCM was written about and known as idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis (IHSS) or asymmetrical septal hypertrophy (ASH). These terms were replaced by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, because the segmental hypertrophy can occur in any segment of the ventricle, not just the septum. Furthermore, this entity can present without subaortic obstruction to flow yet still carry the same ominous risk of arrhythmogenic sudden death and many of its clinical symptoms.

HCM can be separated into obstructive and nonobstructive types. Obstructive HCM is due to midsystolic obstruction of flow through the LV outflow tract as a result of a Bernoulli effect–induced systolic anterior mitral valve movement toward the septum.

The significance of this obstruction, however, is highly controversial. Some investigators and experts believe the obstruction has less to do with the overall hemodynamic and pathophysiologic manifestations of this entity than it does with the inappropriate segmental hypertrophy, which, with its increased myocardial oxygen consumption and substrate for fatal ventricular arrhythmias, has much more significance in the overall clinical picture of this entity and in the treatment and prognosis of HCM.

HCM is a familial disease.[2] There are defects in several of the genes encoding for the sarcomeric proteins, such as myosin heavy chain, actin, tropomyosin, and titin.[3, 4] Multiple mutations have been identified, with genotype-specific risks for mortality and degree of hypertrophy. Interestingly, the genetic basis of ventricular hypertrophy does not directly correlate with prognostic risk stratification. (See Etiology.)

Patients with some mutations, such as specific tropomyosin substitutions, have only a mild degree of ventricular hypertrophy, with little or no LV outflow tract obstruction, but they still carry a disproportionately high risk for sudden death.[5]

Many patients, particularly children, with HCM may not be symptomatic. Careful evaluation of a heart murmur may reveal the condition. (See Physical Examination and Workup.)

2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF)/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy is now available.[6, 7]

Complications

Complications of HCM may include the following:

Congestive heart failureVentricular and supraventricular arrhythmiasInfective mitral endocarditisAtrial fibrillation with mural thrombus formationSudden deathPreviousNextPathophysiology

Since the initial descriptions of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the feature that has attracted the greatest attention is the dynamic pressure gradient across the LV outflow tract. The pressure gradient appears to be related to further narrowing of an already small outflow tract (already narrowed by the marked asymmetrical septal hypertrophy and possibly by an abnormal location of the mitral valve) by the systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve against the hypertrophied septum.

Three explanations for the systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve have been offered, as follows: (1) the mitral valve is pulled against the septum by contraction of the papillary muscles, which occurs because of the valve's abnormal location and septal hypertrophy altering the orientation of the papillary muscles; (2) the mitral valve is pushed against the septum because of its abnormal position in the outflow tract; (3) the mitral valve is drawn toward the septum because of the lower pressure that occurs as blood is ejected at high velocity through a narrowed outflow tract (Venturi effect).

Most patients with HCM have abnormal diastolic function (whether or not a pressure gradient is present), which impairs ventricular filling and increases filling pressure, despite a normal or small ventricular cavity. These patients have abnormal calcium kinetics and subendocardial ischemia, which are related to the profound hypertrophy and myopathic process.

PreviousNextEtiologyAbnormal calcium kinetics

Data link abnormal myocardial calcium kinetics to the cause of the inappropriate myocardial hypertrophy and specific features of HCM, particularly in patients with diastolic functional abnormalities. Abnormal myocardial calcium kinetics and abnormal calcium fluxes from an increase in the number of calcium channels result in an increase in intracellular calcium concentration, which, in turn, may produce hypertrophy and cellular disarray.

Genetic causes

Familial HCM occurs as an autosomal dominant Mendelian-inherited disease in approximately 50% of cases. Some, if not all, of the sporadic forms of the disease may be caused by spontaneous mutations.

At least 6 different genes on at least 4 chromosomes are associated with HCM, with more than 50 different mutations discovered thus far. Familial HCM is a genetically heterogenous disease in that it can be caused by genetic defects at more than 1 locus.

In 1989, Seidman and collaborators first reported the genetic basis for HCM. They reported the existence of a disease gene located on the long arm of chromosome 14. Subsequently, they found this to be the gene encoding for beta cardiac myosin heavy chain.

Wide variation exists in the phenotypic expression of a given mutation of a given gene, with variability in clinical symptoms and the degree of hypertrophy expressed. Phenotypic variability is related to the differences in genotype, with specific mutations associated with particular symptoms, the degree of hypertrophy, and the prognosis.[9]

Other possible causes

Other possible causes of HCM include the following:

Abnormal sympathetic stimulation - Heightened responsiveness of the heart to the excessive production of catecholamines or the reduced neuronal uptake of norepinephrine might cause HCM Abnormally thickened intramural coronary arteries - These do not dilate normally, which leads to myocardial ischemia; this progresses to myocardial fibrosis and abnormal compensatory hypertrophy Subendocardial ischemia - This is related to abnormalities of the cardiac microcirculation that deplete the energy stores essential for the sequestration of calcium during diastole; subendocardial ischemia results in persistent interaction of the contractile elements during diastole and increased diastolic stiffness Cardiac structural abnormalities - These include a catenoid configuration of the septum, which results in myocardial cell hypertrophy and disarray PreviousNextEpidemiology

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is reported in 0.5% of the outpatient population referred for echocardiography.[10] The overall prevalence of HCM is low and has been estimated to occur in 0.05-0.2% of the population.[11] Morphologic evidence of disease is found by echocardiography in approximately 25% of first-degree relatives of patients with HCM. Genetic testing still is in the early stages of research development but can be used to identify asymptomatic family members with the same mutation as the proband (index case).

Sex-related demographics

HCM is slightly more common in males than in females. However, the genetic inheritance pattern is autosomal dominant, without sex predilection. Modifying genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors may lead to a higher likelihood of identification in males, increased symptomatology, or higher degrees of LV outflow obstruction, with more prominent findings upon physical examination.

HCM usually presents at a younger age in females. Females tend to be more symptomatic and are more likely to be disabled by their symptoms than males.

Age-related demographics

In general, HCM has a bimodal peak of occurrence. The most common presentation is in the third decade of life, but it may present in persons of any age, from newborns to elderly individuals.

In children, inherited cases are found in an age range from newborn (ie, stillborn babies) to adult. The peak incidence is in these cases is in the second decade of life.

In adults, the peak incidence is in the third decade of life, with the vast majority of cases occurring in the age range between the third and sixth decades of life.

PreviousNextPrognosis

Reported annual mortality rates in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have ranged from less than 1% to 3-6%, and studies suggest that they have significantly improved over the past 40 years.[12]

A 2006 study reported that published sudden death rates over the previous 10 years were lower than were previously published figures (median 1.0% (range 0.1–1.7) v 2.0% (0–3.5)). Nevertheless, HCM still carries a high risk for mortality and morbidity.[13]

One series of 46 patients with midventricular obstruction was found to have an increased risk of apical aneurysm formation, symptoms, and HCM-related death compared with those who did not have midventricular obstruction; the increased risk of symptoms and death was similar to that seen in patients with LV outflow obstruction.[14]

Most patients with HCM are asymptomatic. Unfortunately, the first clinical manifestation of the disease in such individuals may be sudden death, likely from ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Younger patients, particularly children, have a much higher mortality rate. Children have a much greater degree of ventricular hypertrophy and are much more symptomatic early on in the disease course, most likely because more malignant genotypes are present earlier in life.

The more benign mutations do not elicit a clinical or echocardiographic phenotype or symptoms in the pediatric population. Death often is sudden, unexpected, and typically is associated with sports or vigorous exertion. Early diagnosis is of prime importance in order to prescribe an appropriate level of safe activity.[9, 15, 16]

Screening of first-degree relatives is useful to identify additional affected family members prior to the onset of significant symptoms or sudden death.

Patients can have a myriad of arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular ectopy, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation. These patients are among the highest-risk group for ventricular fibrillation and pose difficult therapeutic decisions for risk reduction.

Patients have a high likelihood of recurrent heart failure resulting from mitral regurgitation and profound diastolic dysfunction. HCM is a progressive condition that worsens over time, as does the gradient across the LV outflow tract if left untreated. Systolic function usually is well preserved until the late stages of the disease. Angina is rare in children but common in adults. Syncope and presyncope are common and may identify individuals at high risk for sudden death.

PreviousNextPatient Education

Family members should learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In addition, refer the patient and family for psychosocial counseling. Refer children of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), especially those in the pediatric age range, for urgent echocardiography and genetic testing if an echocardiogram does not yet reveal overt disease.

Impose activity restrictions that include total abstinence from highly competitive athletic activities and very strenuous physical exertion, such as lifting heavy objects, lifting weights, and shoveling snow.

For patient education information, see the Heart Health Center, as well as Palpitations.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Friday, February 7, 2014

Overview

The fact that subacute, or even chronic, cardiomyopathy may result from the use of cocaine is being increasingly recognized. While most cases of cocaine-related cardiomyopathy have proved to be reversible, others have resulted in permanent cardiac dysfunction or death. However, because morbidity and mortality information associated with cocaine-related cardiomyopathy is based on case reports, it may be underreported. Many deaths in the drug abuse population are ascribed to drug toxicity without further attempts at defining the exact etiology.

Complications of cocaine use also include embolic disease (cerebral and in other organs). Ischemic stroke is seen in the highest frequency in the first few hours after cocaine use, likely due to a thrombogenic effect associated with platelet activation. However, stroke onset may be delayed as long as 1 week, possibly due to the formation of longer-acting secondary metabolites. Cerebral atrophy is also a known feature of chronic cocaine use.

Patient Education

The patient should be educated regarding the absolute necessity of abstinence from cocaine. For patient education information, see Cocaine Abuse, Drug Dependence and Abuse, and Substance Abuse.

NextCardiac Effects of Cocaine

The effect of cocaine on cardiac muscle and coronary vessels remains poorly understood. In acute cocaine exposure, the vasoconstrictive action of the drug seems to have the predominant effect. Coronary vasoconstriction resulting in myocardial ischemia or infarction and systemic vasoconstriction resulting in hypertension or organ ischemia (particularly cerebral) are observed.

Cocaine is known to block the reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine at preganglionic sympathetic nerve endings, and this action by the drug is presumed to cause the increase in heart rate and blood pressure and the acute vasospastic syndromes observed in individuals who use cocaine.

Moreover, pathologic similarities between cocaine-related cardiomyopathy and cardiomyopathy associated with pheochromocytomas suggest that chronic adrenergic stimulation may play a role in the development of cocaine-related cardiomyopathy.

Cocaine inhibits the transient inward flux of sodium across the cell membrane during depolarization and causes local anesthesia. Neurotransmitters released from cardiac sympathetic nerves bind to alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors, eliciting a cascade of intracellular responses. Beta-adrenergic stimulation activates adenylate cyclase, which increases cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) levels and causes increased calcium influx into myocardial cells. The resultant increased intracellular levels of free calcium, including calcium released from cytosolic stores, results in increased force of contraction of the myocyte.

Alpha-adrenergic receptor stimulation produces a cascade of second messenger systems that subsequently regulate calcium channels and in turn elicit increases in cytosolic calcium. Elevated cytosolic calcium can provoke oscillatory depolarizations of the cardiac membrane and trigger sustained action potential generation and extra systoles.

Cellular effects that have been suggested include changes in calcium flux that are similar to those of other cardiac toxins, including digoxin. Increased intracellular concentrations of calcium have been suggested as a cause of depolarization of the cardiac membrane and, therefore, a trigger of sustained action potentials, extra systoles, and tachycardia (sinus, supraventricular, or ventricular). This effect may be present with acute cocaine use. Also, a high concentration of calcium may decrease myofilament responsiveness.

Oxidative stress has been implicated as an early triggering event of cocaine-related cardiomyopathy. Experiments by Isabelle et al used male Wistar rats injected with cocaine to produce left ventricular dysfunction.[1] This cocaine-related cardiomyopathy was prevented by administration of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase and xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitors, thus preventing excess production of these reactive oxygen species.

Decreased calcium concentrations may occur later in the course of cocaine use and result in depressed myocardial function. A local anesthetic action is also observed, similar to lidocaine, which can acutely depress myocardial contractility.

Several studies demonstrate that chronic cocaine use has a direct depressive effect on left ventricular function. This effect seems to be independent of myocardial blood flow and coronary artery diameter. Long-term cocaine use has been associated with regional left ventricular diastolic dysfunction when analyzed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Regarding the subacute and chronic cardiomyopathies, a clear association has been made between ischemic cardiomyopathy and cocaine use. Regional wall motion abnormalities can be observed, even in patients with no history of myocardial infarction. This syndrome is characterized by evidence of multiple infarcts with normal coronary arteries upon catheterization. This is presumed to be present because of vasospasm or thrombosis. Cocaine use has been shown to increase platelet aggregation and lead to thrombus formation.

Chronic cocaine use has been estimated to increase left ventricular muscle mass by up to approximately 70% without associated increases in arterial blood pressure, heart rate, renin, aldosterone, or cortisol. This has been related to an increase in cardiomyocyte protein content by protein kinase C alpha ̶ dependent mechanisms, leading to cardiomyopathy and cardiac hypertrophy.

Cardiac failure due to multiple infarcts is distinct from true cocaine-related cardiomyopathy. Cocaine-related cardiomyopathy shows global myocardial dysfunction. Both entities may be associated with normal coronary arteries or minimal atherosclerotic disease. The situation is further complicated by reports of left ventricular aneurysm formation with embolization in patients with cocaine-related cardiomyopathy. Whether these cases represent cocaine-related cardiomyopathy or ischemic cardiomyopathy due to cocaine is unclear. The presence of both entities in the same patient also is theoretically possible.

Contributing factors

Other agents, particularly adulterants in street cocaine, such as arsenic and magnesium, have been suggested as contributing to cocaine-related cardiomyopathy. Vitamin deficiencies associated with the use of street drugs have also been suggested as contributing factors.

PreviousNextEpidemiology

The 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health[2] reported that approximately 33.7 million Americans aged 12 years and older (13.8% of Americans in that age group) had tried cocaine at least once. In 2005, 2.4 million persons were actively using cocaine.

The reports of cardiomyopathy are case reports, which would seem to imply that it is an infrequent result of cocaine use and may represent an idiosyncratic reaction. However, the true incidence of cardiomyopathy may be substantially underreported. Felker et al reported 1278 cases of dilated cardiomyopathy treated at Johns Hopkins; only 10 cases were ascribed to cocaine use.[3] Bertolet et al reported that in a group of chronic cocaine users studied who did not have cardiac symptoms, 7% had left ventricular systolic dysfunction shown by radionuclide angiography.[4] No cases of cardiomyopathy have been reported following therapeutic use of cocaine.

The age distribution of cocaine-related cardiomyopathy generally follows the age distribution of cocaine use. Most cases are reported in the 30- to 40-year-old age group, with additional patients being somewhat older and somewhat younger.

PreviousNextPatient History

A cocaine-related etiology for cardiomyopathy should be suspected in any patient with a history of cocaine use, particularly binge use, and heart failure, without another established etiology for the heart failure, such as coronary artery disease. While direct questioning of the patient may yield the necessary drug-use information, if the clinical suspicion is high, the diagnosis of cocaine use should be investigated further, perhaps with a urine screen for cocaine and its metabolites.

Patients who use cocaine may have various symptoms referable to the cardiac system. Symptoms can include chest pain with or without myocardial ischemia or aortic dissection, hypertension with or without hypertensive crisis, cerebral ischemia, and hemorrhage. Symptoms of headache and stroke may occur. Patients also may present with acute myocardial decompensation with or without pulmonary edema and shock. In this case, shortness of breath and hypoperfusion dominate the clinical picture.

A study by Chang et al determined that cocaine users who have low to intermediate probability of developing an acute coronary syndrome do not have any increased risk for developing coronary artery disease.[5] As a result, other factors and past medical history are necessary for determining the probability of coronary disease development.

Myocardial ischemia or infarct

Symptoms of chest pain may be of muscular origin but may represent ischemia or infarct. Associated symptoms of myocardial ischemia/infarct usually are present, including diaphoresis, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, and a sense of impending catastrophe. In patients presenting with chest pain, aortic dissection also should be considered.

Congestive heart failure

The symptoms of cocaine-related cardiomyopathy are the same as symptoms for other forms of congestive heart failure. The onset may be very sudden and of short duration.

A history of myocardial infarction (due to cocaine-induced vasospastic ischemia) may be present but often is absent. Symptoms of chronic congestive heart failure usually are absent, but a history of prior congestive heart failure related to cocaine use may be present.

PreviousNextPhysical Examination

Although older and younger patients are common, patients in case reports of cocaine-related cardiomyopathy usually are aged 30-40 years. This is younger than would be expected for a diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy, but viral, toxic, or idiopathic etiologies (including postpartum) are well within this age range. Older patients should be considered if other etiologies are not apparent.

Acute adrenergic findings

Cocaine intoxication usually presents with symptoms of adrenergic excess. Hypertension, occasionally in the range of hypertensive crisis, may be present. Cerebral vascular accidents of either thrombotic or hemorrhagic origin are not uncommon. Acute delirium and mania may be present, particularly if other drugs were used concurrently.

Tachycardia and arrhythmias also occur, particularly atrial fibrillation and premature ventricular contractions. Ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation are observed as well. Acute chest pain syndromes are common and may be due to chest wall pain syndromes or acute myocardial ischemia or infarct.

Finally, an increased incidence of aortic dissection and rupture occurs and must be included in the differential diagnosis. The clinician should search for the appropriate physical findings in these cases.

Findings of acute congestive heart failure

With acute binge use of cocaine, the patient may present with acute congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema. Hypotension, rather than hypertension, may predominate, making the diagnosis and treatment more difficult.

Cocaine-related cardiomyopathy presents more acutely than other types of congestive heart failure, and fewer findings of chronic congestive heart failure are present. Otherwise, the physical findings are similar. Diaphoresis, pallor, and acute dyspnea are present. Cardiogenic shock or evidence of cardiac ischemia also may be present.

Endocarditis

Bacterial endocarditis may accompany cocaine use if the drug was used intravenously. For unknown reasons, cocaine use has been observed as a greater independent risk factor for the development of endocarditis when compared with the use of other drugs. Endocarditis associated with cocaine abuse has been observed to involve left-side cardiac valves more often, which is contrary to endocarditis associated with other drugs. The clinician should search for evidence of valvular dysfunction, possibly acute, and embolic disease.

Findings related to drug abuse

If cocaine has been used intranasally, septal perforation and other signs of cocaine abuse may be present. Needle tracks and other skin changes may be seen, consistent with intravenous (IV) drug use. Psychologic changes, with paranoid ideation, may be present and may make management more difficult.

PreviousNextLaboratory Studies

The laboratory investigation of cardiomyopathy of any etiology generally shows abnormalities of electrolytes and compromised renal function, with elevation of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine.

Cocaine usually is evident on a urine toxicology screen, because these cases almost always present immediately after use of the drug. Because individuals who use cocaine are predisposed to the development of endocarditis, consider blood cultures if the setting is at all appropriate.

PreviousNextImaging Studies

In cases of cardiomyopathy, the chest radiograph usually shows evidence of cardiomegaly and congestive heart failure. Evidence of septic emboli may be present if endocarditis is present. The radiograph may be normal in many cases.

Echocardiographic evaluation shows chamber dilation and global dysfunction or regional wall motion abnormalities if myocardial infarction is present. Echocardiographic studies have shown that individuals who abuse cocaine have an increased left ventricular mass index with a higher tendency toward increased posterior wall thickness.

Cardiac catheterization usually shows normal coronary arteries or only minimal disease, even in the presence of myocardial infarction.

In acute chest pain syndromes, the electrocardiogram (ECG) may show evidence of acute ischemia or infarction. In cases of cardiomyopathy, the ECG is not specific but may show evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy and nonspecific ST-T wave changes. Arrhythmias also may be detected, and continuous monitoring may be advisable.

PreviousNextHistologic Findings

Chokshi et al were among the first authors to describe a reversible cocaine-related cardiomyopathy. The patient in their report, a 35-year-old woman, underwent endomyocardial biopsy that failed to reveal any necrosis, fibrosis, or inflammatory infiltrate.[6]

In autopsies of 40 patients, 31 of whom died cocaine-related deaths and 9 of whom were homicide victims with detectable blood cocaine levels, Virmani et al found that 20% of the patients showed evidence of myocarditis on toxic screening tests.[7] Tazelaar, in an autopsy study, reported contraction-based myocardial necrosis similar to that observed in pheochromocytoma.[8]

In a case report by Robledo-Carmona, histologic findings of the left ventricular myocardium included sparse mononuclear infiltrates associated with degenerative changes, myocyte necrosis, and severe interstitial fibrosis.[9]

PreviousNextTreatment for Hypertension

Patients who present with hypertension may require no treatment except monitoring and the occasional use of benzodiazepines for sedation. In some cases, however, hypertension may be more severe, and patients may require treatment for hypertensive crisis. This should include IV vasodilators and, occasionally, diuretics.

Nitroglycerin is particularly useful if evidence of myocardial ischemia is present. If sympathetic blockers are needed (arrhythmia or ischemia), beta blockers should not be used as the sole agents, because this may lead to unopposed alpha activity and may worsen hypertension. An alpha blocker or ganglionic blocker may be used in conjunction with beta blockers.

PreviousNextTreatment for Myocardial Ischemia

Chest pain is a common presentation in patients who use cocaine; this may be secondary to either myocardial ischemia or chest wall pain syndromes of other etiologies. An electrocardiographic evaluation is required in all such cases to aid in differentiating these possibilities.

If myocardial ischemia without ST segment elevation is present, the patient should receive nitroglycerin, preferably intravenously. Narcotics also may be helpful if relief cannot be obtained with nitroglycerin.

If an ST elevation is present, prompt cardiac catheterization should be performed. If that is not available, thrombolytic therapy should be considered. However, special care must be taken to exclude aortic dissection and intracranial bleeding, both of which are associated with cocaine use.

PreviousNextTreatment for Congestive Heart Failure

Treatment consists of the standard therapy for congestive heart failure, ie, diuretics and vasodilators as tolerated. If shock is present, inotropic agents and vasopressors are indicated.

If evidence of ongoing ischemia is present, aggressive use of agents directed at relieving vasospasm (nitrates and calcium channel ̶ blocking drugs) are indicated. Endotracheal intubation may be necessary. If arrhythmias are present and are felt to be compromising the clinical situation, they should be treated aggressively. The use of beta-blocking drugs as single agents is contraindicated.

PreviousNextAdditional Treatment Considerations

Because many patients with cocaine-related cardiomyopathy must be treated for shock and because appropriate fluid management is difficult in this setting, a pulmonary artery line frequently is placed. An arterial line may be placed in order to adequately manage blood pressure. The use of an intra-aortic balloon has been described, in order to bridge the gap until cardiac function can improve.

Endocarditis may be present if the patient was using cocaine intravenously, and this should be considered if the patient’s condition does not improve as anticipated. Other complications of drug use also should be considered (eg, hepatitis, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection).

As improvement occurs, treatment should be tapered. Withdraw pressor and inotropic agents, and transfer the patient from IV to oral diuretics and vasodilators. At the time of hospital discharge, some patients may require no therapy at all.

Cocaine cessation

In most of reported cases of cocaine-related cardiomyopathy, patients have shown significant improvement following the cessation of cocaine use. In some cases, patients have returned to normal cardiac function, but recurrence is reported if the patient relapses into cocaine use.

Efforts to assist the patient with their drug addiction should be a part of every treatment plan. Hospitalization for detoxification may be necessary, particularly if other drugs also are being abused. Outpatient treatment of drug dependence is strongly advised. Abstinence from cocaine use is mandatory.

Consultations

Consultation with a cardiologist is advisable. Consultation with a psychiatrist is advisable as well, for assistance with drug abuse treatment issues.

PreviousNextOutpatient Care

Diuretics or vasodilators (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors) may be helpful in some cases but are not always needed. Therapy is highly individualized, because the severity of the residual cardiac dysfunction is quite variable. Consider issues of compliance. The use of beta blockers, which would ordinarily be considered in the treatment of congestive heart failure, probably should be avoided.

Outpatient treatment of drug abuse issues is of extreme importance, and every effort should be made to assist the patient in this regard. Recurrent congestive heart failure has been reported in patients who return to cocaine use.

Previous, Cocaine-Related Cardiomyopathy

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Overview

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) has a number of definitions, but the authors prefer to use the one put forth by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on PPCM 2010.[1]

By this definition, PPCM is an idiopathic cardiomyopathy that presents with heart failure secondary to left ventricular systolic dysfunction toward the end of pregnancy or in the months after delivery, in the absence of any other cause of heart failure. PPCM is a diagnosis of exclusion. Although the left ventricle may not be dilated, the ejection fraction is nearly always reduced below 45%.[1]

In contrast to other definitions, the Heart Failure Association’s definition specifically excludes women who develop PPCM early in their pregnancy and explicitly notes that not all cases of PPCM present with left ventricular dilation.[2] Thus, it helps avoid misdiagnosis of other conditions that present with pulmonary edema in pregnancy, such as diastolic dysfunction from preeclampsia and other disorders (see Diagnosis).

PPCM is more common in multiparous women. It has been reported more often in twin gestations and in women with preeclampsia, but both of these conditions are associated with a lower serum oncotic pressure that can predispose to noncardiogenic pulmonary edema in the setting of other stressors.

The severity of symptoms in patients with PPCM can be classified by the New York Heart Association system as follows:

Class I - Disease with no symptomsClass II - Mild symptoms/effect on function or symptoms only with extreme exertionClass III - Symptoms with minimal exertionClass IV - Symptoms at restNextPathophysiology and Etiology

The exact cause of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is unknown, but the usual causes of systolic dysfunction and pulmonary edema should be excluded. Many nutritional disorders have been suggested as causes, but other than salt overload, none has been validated by epidemiologic studies.

An increased prevalence of myocarditis has been found in case series and in a small case-control study. Abnormal myocardial biopsy findings were associated with a worse long-term prognosis for recovery. More recent data have found a similar incidence of myocarditis in women with PPCM, compared to those with the idiopathic type. However, a study that found myocarditis in 62% of 44 women with PPCM found that the finding did not correlate with survival.

Lower levels of selenium have been found in patients with PPCM. Autoantibodies against myocardial proteins have been identified in patients with PPCM but not in those with idiopathic cardiomyopathy.[3]

Case reports and anecdotal experience have documented ejection fractions as low as 10-15% in patients with severe preeclampsia, with subsequent normalization of echocardiograms within 3-6 months. Preeclampsia has been listed as a risk factor, but it may be the cause in some cases. Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema has many causes, all of which must be considered.[4]

A study in 2005 found that 8 of 26 patients had parvovirus B19, human herpes virus 6, Epstein-Barr virus, and human cytomegalovirus detected after molecular analysis of myocardial biopsy specimens.[5]

Other findings that are associated with PPCM but are not clearly causal include increased levels of inflammation and oxidative stress markers, increased levels of cathepsin D, and oxidized low-density lipoprotein.

Two studies have suggested that a subset of cases of PPCM result from a genetic cause.[6, 7] Case reports of women from the same family who developed PPCM suggest a possible familial/genetic risk, but it seems that some of these women may have familial dilated cardiomyopathy that is unmasked by the normal physiologic changes of pregnancy.[6]

Some have hypothesized that microchimerism, or fetal cells present in the maternal system that elicit an inflammatory response, could be a potential contributing factor to the development of PPCM.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyUnited States statistics

Reports estimating the incidence of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) in the United States vary widely, ranging from 1 case per 15,000 live births to 1 case per 4000 live births to 1 case per 1300 live births. Approximately 75% of cases are diagnosed within the first month post partum, and 45% present in the first week. When PPCM is suspected, one must establish the diagnosis rapidly.[8]

International statistics

The prevalence is reported to be 1 case per 6000 live births in Japan, 1 case per 1000 live births in South Africa, and 1 case per 350-400 live births in Haiti. A high prevalence in Nigeria is caused by the tradition of ingesting kanwa (dried lake salt) while lying on heated mud beds twice a day for 40 days post partum. The high salt intake leads to volume overload.

Age-, sex-, and race-related demographics

PPCM is unique to pregnant women of all reproductive ages. Initially thought to be more common in women older than 30 years, PPCM has since been reported across a wide range of age groups. The past bias toward older women may be related to the fact that this group has a higher prevalence of undiagnosed conditions, such as thyrotoxicosis, mitral stenosis, or hypertension, which, in combination with some complication of pregnancy and the physiologic alterations of pregnancy, leads to pulmonary edema.

PPCM has been reported in white, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese women. Case series indicate that many cases occur in African American women from the southern United States. A case control study in the United States found that, when compared to non-African Americans, African American women had a 15.7-fold higher relative risk of PPCM.[9]

PreviousNextClinical PresentationPatient history

Many presenting complaints observed in patients with cardiac disease occur during a normal pregnancy. Dyspnea, dizziness, orthopnea, and decreased exercise capacity often are normal symptoms in pregnant women. Mild dyspnea upon exertion is particularly common in a normal pregnancy. The classic dyspnea of pregnancy is often described as the woman feeling as if she is unable to get enough air in, to get a good deep breath, or both, and it is thought to be due to the progesterone-mediated hyperventilation.

Early, rapid diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is not the norm. It took 7 or more days to establish the diagnosis in 48% of women, and half of those had major adverse events before the diagnosis was made.[10] Often, patients do not show any indication of the syndrome until after delivery. If a patient makes it through labor—essentially nature’s stress test—without symptoms, the onsite clinician might not consider PPCM as the first cause when a woman decompensates.

Many PPCM patients present with heart failure or a major adverse event (eg, stroke or respiratory failure) without any previous signs or symptoms to alert the clinician that a cardiomyopathy was going to develop; 19% of patients may present with the syndrome before the last gestational month.[8] Symptoms are the same as in patients with systolic dysfunction who are not pregnant. New or rapid onset of the following symptoms requires prompt evaluation:

CoughOrthopneaParoxysmal nocturnal dyspneaFatiguePalpitationsHemoptysisChest painAbdominal painPhysical examination

In a normal pregnancy, as a result of the increase in endogenous progestins, respiratory tidal volume is increased and patients have a tendency to hyperventilate. However, the rate of respiration should be normal. Normal pregnancy is characterized by an exaggerated x and y descent of the jugular venous waveform, but the jugular venous pressure should be normal.

Cardiac auscultation reveals a systolic ejection murmur at the lower left sternal edge, over the pulmonary area, or both in 96% of women.[11] This pulmonic arterial flow murmur tends to become quieter during inspiration. Diastolic murmurs warrant further evaluation.

The first heart sound (S1) may be exaggerated, and the second heart sound (S2) split may be more prominent due to increased right-sided flow. Whereas a third heart sound (S3) has been described as a normal finding in pregnancy, the authors have not found that to be the case in busy clinical practices at women’s hospitals that see approximately 14,000 deliveries a year.

Peripheral edema occurs in approximately one third of healthy gravid women. However, be alert to sudden changes in swelling late in pregnancy, which can be abnormal and should be investigated.

In a patient with PPCM, signs of heart failure are the same as in patients with systolic dysfunction who are not pregnant. Tachycardia and decreased pulse oximetry (should be ≥ 97% at sea level) are present. Blood pressure may be normal. Elevated blood pressures (systolic >140 mm Hg and/or diastolic >90 mm Hg) and hyperreflexia with clonus suggest preeclampsia.

Physical findings of PPCM include elevated jugular venous pressure, cardiomegaly, third heart sound, loud pulmonic component of the second heart sound, mitral or tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary rales, worsening of peripheral edema, ascites, arrhythmias, embolic phenomenon, and hepatomegaly.

Maternal and fetal complications

Maternal complications may include the following:

HypoxiaThromboembolism - Small series have reported the incidence to be as high as 50%, but these results have obvious selection bias Progressive cardiac failureArrhythmiasMisinterpretation of hemodynamic data obtained from right-heart catheterization as a result of failure to consider the normal physiologic alterations of pregnancy (see Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring) Inadequate treatment or testing because of exaggerated concern about the effect on the fetusMisdiagnosis of preeclampsia - Patients with preeclampsia experience depletion of intravascular volume and should receive low doses of diuretics only when they have pulmonary edema

Fetal complications may include the following:

Distress due to maternal hypoxiaDistress due to placental hypoperfusion as a result of poor cardiac output, maternal hypovolemia due to excessive diuresis, or hypotension from aggressive afterload reduction PreviousNextDiagnosis

The differential diagnosis includes the following:

Aortic StenosisCardiomyopathy, AlcoholicCardiomyopathy, CocaineCardiomyopathy, DilatedCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicCardiomyopathy, RestrictiveCardiovascular Disease and PregnancyCoronary Artery AtherosclerosisHypertensionHypertension and PregnancyHypertension, MalignantMitral StenosisNoncardiogenic pulmonary edema during pregnancy: Pregnancy is a state of low oncotic pressure reflected in decreased serum albumin (expected values, ~3.2 mg/dL); consequently, when other stressors are present, pulmonary edema can occur with normal cardiac filling pressures; the most common triggers include pyelonephritis and other infections, corticosteroids, and tocolytics such as beta agonists and magnesium sulfate Preeclampsia (toxemia of pregnancy)Pulmonary Disease and PregnancyPulmonary Edema, CardiogenicPulmonary Edema, Neurogenic

Other problems to be considered include the following:

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasiaCardiomyopathy, diabetic heart diseaseInfectious, toxic, or metabolic disordersPreviousNextLaboratory Studies

Creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) levels can be elevated after normal delivery due to release from the uterus and may be elevated after cesarean section due to release from the uterus and/or skeletal muscle. An elevated CPK level is not diagnostic of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), because it can be elevated for many other reasons, including normal delivery, skeletal muscle disorders, and viral myocarditis.

The CPK from the placenta routinely has a CPK-MB fraction of 6% or more.[12] Therefore, without an obvious clinical presentation and electrocardiographic (ECG) findings to suggest myocardial infarction, the use of this test in the puerperium is very limited.

Troponin-I elevations are more likely to indicate true myocardial disease, whether it is inflammatory or due to infarction. They are certainly useful in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction.

One study found that a cardiac troponin T level greater than 0.04 ng/mL, measured within 2 weeks of diagnosis, was 60% sensitive at identifying women more likely to have persistent ventricular dysfunction at 6 months after the diagnosis. Given the poor sensitivity, the clinical use of this test is not entirely clear; these women should be placed on maximal medical therapy and undergo serial echocardiographic assessments regardless of the troponin result.[13]

Preeclampsia should be excluded on the basis of the history, the physical examination, and blood work. New headaches, visual disturbances, right-side abdominal pain, and new swelling of the hands or face may be present. Retinal vasospasm, a fourth heart sound (S4) heard on cardiac auscultation, hyperreflexia/clonus, right upper quadrant tenderness, and face or hand edema may be present. Abnormalities found with preeclampsia include the following:

Serum creatinine level greater than 0.8 mg/dLHemoglobin level greater than 13 g/dl (due to leaky capillaries and hemoconcentration)Elevated liver enzymesThrombocytopeniaUrine dipstick test results indicating more than “1+” proteinDecreased 24-hour urine creatinine clearance (normally 150% above the nonpregnant level, or approximately 150 mL/min)More than 300 mg of proteinuria evident on a 24-hour collection

On urinalysis, trace or 1+ proteinuria can be normal. Proteinuria 2+ or higher suggests preeclampsia. Exclude infection; urine culture is helpful in this regard.

Measure pulse oximetry. Determine thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. Keep the potassium level above 4 mEq/L and the magnesium level above 2 mEq/L.

Serologic testing may help identify known causes of cardiomyopathy, including infections (eg, viral, rickettsial, HIV, syphilis, Chagas disease, diphtheria toxin). Exclude toxic etiologies such as ethanol and cocaine. When indicated, exclude systemic disorders such as collagen vascular diseases, sarcoidosis, thyrotoxicosis, pheochromocytoma, and acromegaly.

Electrocardiography

ECGs evaluate for conduction abnormalities. Results may be normal, show sinus tachycardia, or, rarely, atrial fibrillation if the cardiomyopathy is severe. Other nonspecific findings include low voltage, left ventricular hypertrophy, and nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities.

PreviousNextEchocardiography

Consider calling a cardiologist for an immediate echocardiogram. Echocardiography should be performed in all women in whom the diagnosis of PPCM is considered in order to assess ventricular function, valve structure, chamber size, and wall motion. Cardiac chambers enlarge slightly during pregnancy, usually within normal limits. Normal function suggests a lung process or noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, and diastolic dysfunction can be observed in patients with severe preeclampsia.

PreviousNextChest Radiography

Rapid diagnosis must be established. When evaluating new onset dyspnea, tachycardia, or hypoxia, immediately obtain a chest radiograph to detect pulmonary edema. This should be performed with abdominal shielding to evaluate the etiology of hypoxia and exclude pneumonia.

Fetal radiation exposure with 2 maternal chest radiographs with abdominal shielding is about 0.00007 rads. The accepted limit of fetal radiation exposure during pregnancy is 5 rads. To reassure patients about the safety of a single study, note that you are obtaining 1 out of more than 70,000 maternal chest radiographs that are theoretically permissible.

Patchy infiltrates in the lower lung fields, with vascular redistribution/cephalization, cardiomegaly, and pleural effusions, indicate congestive heart failure. Remember that noncardiogenic pulmonary edema may occur when a pregnant woman has a concurrent infection. In this setting, the cardiac pressures may be normal and cephalization of vessels may not be present.

Bilateral lower lobe infiltrates without vascular redistribution suggest either an atypical pneumonia or noncardiogenic pulmonary edema (see the image below) resulting from the low oncotic state of pregnancy combined with various stressors.

Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema in patient with preNoncardiogenic pulmonary edema in patient with preeclampsia, due to capillary leak that can be primary component of preeclampsia. Radiograph reveals diffuse increase in lung markings without cephalization or vascular redistribution seen in patients with pulmonary edema from systolic dysfunction. Patient had rapid clinical improvement after only 10 mg of intravenous furosemide. PreviousNextStress Testing

Exclude coronary artery disease when the patient presents with symptoms suggestive of cardiac ischemia. Vasospasm can occur with preeclampsia and cocaine use. Some postmenopausal or perimenopausal women are conceiving with the assistance of hormone replacement therapy. The prevalence of coronary artery disease in this population must be considered.

Stress echocardiography is the test of choice to look for coronary artery disease during pregnancy. If stress echocardiography is desired but not available, nuclear imaging can be performed safely during pregnancy if one feels that the result will significantly alter maternal management.

Fetal radiation exposure with a thallium stress test is estimated to be less than 0.1 rads. The accepted limit of fetal radiation exposure during pregnancy is 5 rads. Thus, a single stress test represents only 1/50th of the safe dose, or 1 out of the 50 stress tests that can theoretically be performed safely during pregnancy. Organogenesis is complete after the first trimester (13th week of gestation); therefore, testing in the second or third trimester will not cause any gross physical deformities.

PreviousNextInvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring

Right-side heart catheterization should be performed only with an understanding of the hemodynamic changes observed during normal pregnancy. Catheterization can be avoided if the patient responds to medical therapy (see General Treatment Approach).

Beginning early in gestation and peaking around 28 weeks, blood volume and cardiac output increase by 50%, systemic vascular resistance falls by more than 50% to a mean of 850 dynes/sec/cm-5, and heart rate increases by approximately 10-20% above the prepregnant value in a singleton gestation.

Preeclampsia is associated with diastolic left ventricular dysfunction, increased systemic vascular resistance, and intravascular volume depletion despite total-body volume overload.

Empiric use of pulmonary artery catheters in critically ill patients has come under question; this particularly is true for pregnant women. Use of a pulmonary artery catheter may be helpful during labor and delivery in a patient who has severe structural cardiac disease or stenotic lesions and in anyone who is New York Heart Association class III or IV (see Overview).

Close attention to vital signs, volume status, urine output, and oxygenation is more likely to detect clinically important changes. These assessments allow treatment decisions to be guided by the global assessment of a patient’s unique physiology rather than a standard response to a single number.

PreviousNextOther StudiesMagnetic resonance imaging

A report of 2 cases found no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities in one of the patients and areas of delayed myocardial enhancement in the other.[14] One month after presentation, the patient with the normal MRI had a normal ejection fraction. Six months after presentation, the patient with MRI abnormalities at baseline had an ejection fraction of 30% and some persistent areas of abnormality seen on repeat cardiac MRI.

Another series of 8 patients with PPCM did not detect any abnormalities on cardiac MRI.[15]

A single case report does not justify routine use of cardiac MRI as a prognostic tool when an echocardiogram is readily available to evaluate the ejection fraction.

PreviousNextTissue Analysis and Histologic Findings

Endomyocardial biopsy is controversial, in that it has not yet been demonstrated to offer information that can significantly alter the plan of care.

A series of 18 American women[16] and 11 African women[17] found myocarditis in 10 and 4 patients, respectively. In the African cohort, 3 of 4 with myocarditis had persistent heart failure, and 4 of 5 without it improved. In the American cohort, 14 of 18 had myocarditis on biopsy. Of the 14, 10 were treated with immunosuppressive therapy and 9 of them improved. However, all 4 patients with myocarditis who did not receive immunosuppressive therapy improved as well.

Whereas some small cohort studies suggest that the finding of myocarditis on biopsy could provide prognostic information, others have not found it to provide any such information. Accordingly, the use of this invasive procedure in this population is not clear.

Findings at autopsy have included a dilated heart, pale myocardium, endocardial thickening, and pericardial fluid. Biopsy specimens may show myofiber hypertrophy or degeneration, fibrosis, edema, or lymphocytic infiltration. Ventricular thrombi can be seen. Lymphocytic myocarditis was found in some series, but the clinical significance of this is not clear because, as with endomyocardial biopsy, there is no convincing evidence to support immunosuppressive therapy if this result is obtained.[16]

PreviousNextGeneral Treatment Approach

One must remember that a healthy fetus depends on a healthy mother. Formulate the care plan and consider the consequences of not treating the mother before addressing the potential or theoretical effects of a test/treatment on the fetus. This approach will help clarify the best plan for clinicians who infrequently address medical issues during pregnancy.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classification system regarding the use of drugs in pregnancy is grossly oversimplified. Rely on a text dedicated to the use of medications during pregnancy or an experienced clinician. This information will reassure the treating physician, and the patient, about the best plan of action. Restricting the use of a medication solely based on medicolegal concerns still occurs, but should not.

Medications should be used when the benefit to the mother is clear. To quote the FDA descriptions, any medication in class A through D may be used when the potential benefit justifies the potential risk. Organogenesis is completed by 13 weeks’ gestation. Although some medications may have direct effects on the fetus, no risk of teratogenesis is present after the first trimester. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) are contraindicated in pregnancy because of fetal renal dysgenesis and death.

Patients with systolic dysfunction during pregnancy are treated the same as patients who are not pregnant. The mainstays of medical therapy are digoxin, loop diuretics, afterload reduction with hydralazine and nitrates, and beta-adrenergic blockad with carvedilol or metoprolol succinate as they have been shown to decrease all-cause mortality and hospitalization in those with systolic dysnfuction. Because there is a high risk of venous and arterial thrombosis, anticoagulation with heparin should be instituted when the ejection fraction is less than 30%.

Consider rapid transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU) for monitoring of maternal status. Consider transfer to a center that offers tertiary care services for both the mother and the fetus. If the mother is less than 37 weeks’ gestation, transfer her to a center with a neonatal ICU.

Route of delivery

Delivering the fetus decreases the metabolic demands on the mother, but afterload increases due to the loss of the low-resistance placental bed.

Vaginal deliveries are preferred because they are associated with much lower rates of complications, such as endometritis and pulmonary embolism, 75% of which occur in association with cesarean delivery. Vaginal deliveries are not associated with the postoperative third-spacing of fluid that occurs after cesarean deliveries. This third-spaced fluid reverses after approximately 48 hours, leading to intravascular volume overload and possible maternal decompensation.

Unless the mother is decompensating, managing her medically and waiting for a spontaneous vaginal delivery is reasonable. If she is not responding to medical therapy or if the fetus must be delivered for obstetric reasons, the best plan is to induce labor with the goal of a vaginal delivery.

Pain control

Early and effective control of maternal pain during delivery is paramount. Regional anesthesia, such as epidural or spinal, is not associated with the myocardial depression observed with inhaled anesthetics. Ideally, the laboring patient will receive early epidural anesthesia, and labor will be augmented with oxytocin, when necessary.

The patient should not be allowed to push; the uterus can expel the fetus without maternal pushing. The obstetrician may apply a low-forceps or a vacuum device to assist with the final stage of the delivery.

Analgesics reduce pain, which decreases sympathetic stress, in addition to providing some preload reduction.

Surgical therapy

Use intra-aortic balloon pumps when indicated.

Cardiac transplantation and left ventricular assist devices have been used to treat PPCM. These should be considered for women with progressive left ventricular dysfunction or deterioration despite medical therapy. Most centers will need to consider transfer of such patients to a heart-transplant center for such therapy. However, left ventricular function in most of these patients improves over time, and surgical therapy should be delayed if possible.

Diet and activity

The patient should follow a low-sodium (2 g/day sodium chloride) diet. Strict bedrest may increase the risk of venous thromboembolism and no longer is recommended as a mainstay of therapy. Activity should be limited only by the patient’s symptoms. In severe cases of true PPCM, bedrest may promote better uteroplacental perfusion.

Consultations

Many internists do not have extensive exposure to diagnosing and treating medical disorders during pregnancy and therefore feel uncomfortable doing so. The best way to address this is consultation with an obstetric internist, a perinatologist, or a medical subspecialist. Their experience allows them to quickly help assess which treatments offer the best risk-to-benefit ratio. In most situations, the benefit of maximizing maternal well-being with the usual therapies outweighs the potential effects on the fetus, which make some feel uneasy.

Consultations depend on which specialties are available locally and may include the following:

Internist with expertise in medical disorders in pregnancy (obstetric internist, pulmonary/critical care specialist, cardiologist)High-risk obstetrician (maternal fetal medicine/perinatologist)Anesthesiologist - Neuraxial anesthesia is preferred to avoid myocardial depression from inhaled anesthetics; for this reason, as the mother nears delivery, low-molecular-weight heparin should be used with caution. PreviousNextPharmacologic Therapy

In the treatment of systolic dysfunction in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), data prove the benefits of many medications, such as digoxin, vasodilators in combination with nitrates, beta-adrenergic blocking agents (metoprolol succinate and carvedilol—metoprolol tartrate is reasonable if the succinate form is not available), calcium channel blockers (amlodipine), loop diuretics (furosemide), and potassium-sparing diuretics (spironolactone).

Historically, hydralazine and nitrates are effective agents for reducing preload and afterload and have been the medications of choice during pregnancy, but the critical role of beta-adrenergic blockers in improving survival in patients with systolic heart failure has now been well established.

Use diuretics when indicated to manage the maternal volume status, but obviously, monitor electrolytes and avoid maternal volume depletion that could lead to uteroplacental hypoperfusion.

Digoxin and inotropes

Initiate therapy with digoxin in women with an abnormal ejection fraction. Digoxin is the drug of choice during pregnancy. Intravenous (IV) dobutamine should be used when indicated. Improving cardiac output ensures adequate uteroplacental perfusion. Consider invasive hemodynamic monitoring to gauge the response to therapy. These agents are compatible with breastfeeding.

Diuretics

Diuretics should be used very cautiously in women with preeclampsia because intravascular volume depletion is a hallmark of that syndrome.

When pulmonary edema is diagnosed, loop diuretics should be the first-line treatment. Start with 10 mg of furosemide, as pregnant women have an increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that facilitates secretion of the drug into the loop of Henle.

Spironolactone has been shown to decrease morbidity and improve survival when administered to nonpregnant outpatients with systolic dysfunction. However, clinical experience with potassium-sparing diuretics such as spironolactone in pregnancy is limited in comparison to that accumulated with furosemide. Bumetanide may be used when clinically indicated, and a thiazide may be added cautiously to a loop diuretic for a synergistic effect in diuretic-resistant patients.

Hydralazine and nitrates

Nitrates may be used to decrease maternal preload when indicated; they are safe for the mother and fetus and are compatible with breastfeeding. As with any medication that alters maternal hemodynamics, a drop in blood pressure can result in fetal hypoperfusion and distress. IV drips should be titrated very slowly, and maternal intravascular euvolemia should be maintained.

Hydralazine, in combination with nitrates, is the first choice for afterload reduction and vasodilatation during pregnancy. A Veterans Affairs study of nonpregnant patients with congestive heart failure showed a 36% mortality risk reduction in the group treated with preload and afterload reducers such as hydralazine and oral nitrates.

Although hydralazine in combination with nitrates is the preferred regimen during pregnancy, women should be switched to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) after delivery.

Beta-blockers

Carvedilol and amlodipine have been shown to benefit patients with systolic function who are not pregnant. These drugs may be used safely as second-line agents during pregnancy when clinically indicated. Vasodilators should be started at a low initial dose, but recognize that hepatic and renal clearance of medications is accelerated during pregnancy. All are compatible with breastfeeding. More data are available on the use of metoprolol during pregnancy, but carvedilol is a reasonable option.

In studies of patients who are not pregnant and had congestive heart failure, metoprolol succinate, in addition to conventional therapies, effected a 34% reduction in the need for heart transplant or the incidence of death. A similar study of carvedilol showed a 65% reduction in mortality.

Calcium channel blockers

In specialized conducting and automatic cells in the heart, calcium is involved in the generation of the action potential. The calcium channel blockers inhibit movement of calcium ions across the cell membrane, depressing both impulse formation (automaticity) and conduction velocity.

Anticoagulants

PPCM is associated with a high rate of thromboembolic complications. Cases of arterial or venous thrombosis have been reported in as many as 50% of women with PPCM; the risk likely is related to the degree of chamber enlargement, systolic dysfunction, and the presence of atrial fibrillation. Because pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state, once the diagnosis of PPCM is established, prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered during pregnancy.

Full-dose/therapeutic anticoagulation should be initiated ante partum for women with deep venous thrombosis, atrial fibrillation, ventricular thrombi, or embolic events, and possibly for those with an ejection fraction of less than 30%. Treatment should be continued until at least 6 weeks post partum.

In the absence of those clear risk factors, the authors recommend at least low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Enoxaparin should not be used in women with artificial valves. In this setting a reasonable choice is 5,000 units of UFH subcutaneously 2 or 3 times daily in the first trimester, 7,500 units in the second trimester, and 10,000 units twice daily in the third trimester. Enoxaparin 40 mg daily or twice daily is also reasonable.

UFH has an advantage over LMWH because of the ease with which the level of anticoagulation with UFH can be assessed by obtaining an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In addition, protamine is not as effective at reversing LMWH in the setting of obstetric bleeding. The decision to use prophylactic dosing versus a high-dose regimen that will elevate the aPTT must be individualized on the basis of obstetric issues and the severity of the disease (see above).

Due to the occurrence of epidural hematomas, the American Society of Anesthesiology recommends that women on full-dose LMWH not receive spinal or epidural anesthesia for 24 hours after the last injection. The LMWH is not predictably reversed with protamine. Fresh frozen plasma should be used to definitively neutralize it. If cesarean delivery is required, these patients may receive an inhaled anesthetic that can further depress myocardial contractility.

Warfarin is the drug of choice post partum. Consider it for use in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Warfarin crosses into breast milk, but studies show that it does not affect the newborn coagulation system; therefore, it is compatible with breastfeeding. It does carry a risk of spontaneous fetal cerebral hemorrhage in the second and third trimesters. Women may prefer oral warfarin to 1-2 heparin injections a day.

Antiplatelet agents

In an open-label clinical trial assessing pentoxifylline 400 mg 3 times daily in a group of women with PPCM who were treated with diuretics, digoxin, enalapril, and carvedilol, a combined end-point of poor outcome—defined as death, failure to improve the left ventricular ejection fraction more than 10 absolute points, or functional class III or IV at latest follow-up—occurred in 27% of patients treated with pentoxifylline and in 52% of those on usual therapy.

A small randomized trial (n=39) of pentoxifylline has shown that it may improve symptoms, left ventricular function (by 5%), and lower levels of inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha. However, not all studies found a beneficial effect.

Given the poor prognosis of persistent cardiac dysfunction, and on the assumption that the patients do not experience side effects from the medication, it seems reasonable to consider adding this medication to the standard regimen, as long as both the clinician and the patient understand that the available data were obtained from underpowered studies.

Other agents

Oxytocin is used to augment labor and may increase pulmonary arterial pressures. It also can control postpartum bleeding or hemorrhage. The pressor effect of sympathomimetics may increase when used concomitantly with oxytocic drugs, causing postpartum hypertension. Oxytocin has an intrinsic antidiuretic effect that, when administered by continuous infusion to a patient receiving fluids by mouth, can cause water intoxication.

Morphine sulfate can be used to decrease preload and decrease dyspnea.

Immunosuppression should not be used empirically, and current evidence does not support the routine use of immunosuppressive agents for myocarditis.

On the basis of inferences from an animal model of PPCM,[18] a pilot study reported randomizing women to bromocriptine therapy after the diagnosis of PPCM[19] . One should continue to monitor the literature for new developments regarding this medication, but until the results of an appropriately powered study are published, bromocriptine should be used with caution.[20]

PreviousNextFurther Inpatient/Outpatient Care

Consider the following for hemodynamic changes during labor and delivery.

During the second stage of labor, cardiac output can increase by 15-20% with each contraction and as high as 45% from baseline. Immediately after delivery, the contracted uterus squeezes 300-500 mL of blood into the systemic circulation. This autotransfusion, along with the release of inferior vena cava compression by the gravid uterus, leads to an increase in cardiac output as high as 10-20% over predelivery levels. Most of the stress related to the autotransfused blood may be offset by typical blood loss of 300-500 mL during delivery.

Additionally, cardiac output may increase by as much as 65% in the subsequent postpartum period due to the loss of the low-resistance placental bed and a decrease in the vascular compliance that was maintained by the hormonal changes of pregnancy. Most of the subsequent return of blood volume and cardiac output to normal prepregnancy levels occurs by approximately 2 weeks post partum.

Importantly, when pulmonary edema resolves within 1-2 days, a noncardiogenic etiology should be considered.

An echocardiogram should be ordered as indicated by new clinical findings or by a decline in function. If an echocardiogram reveals abnormal systolic function during pregnancy, a repeat study should be obtained approximately 2 months after delivery. If the results of that study show that systolic function has improved but has not returned to normal levels, another study should be obtained within the year to determine the patient’s new baseline.

After delivery, patients on hydralazine/nitrates should be placed on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), and the dose should be maximized. These medications are felt to be compatible with breastfeeding.

For women considering pregnancy or those who desire an evaluation to estimate the risk of a future pregnancy, recovery of systolic function is a prime concern (see Prognosis). If recovery of systolic function is complete, the prognosis is excellent. Those women with persistent systolic dysfunction should be maintained on vasodilators, nitrates, and diuretics as tolerated and indicated.

PreviousNextPrognosis

Prognosis seems dependent on recovery of left ventricular function. Thirty percent of patients return to baseline ventricular function within 6 months, and 50% of patients have significant improvement in symptoms and ventricular function.

The usual causes of death in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are progressive heart failure, arrhythmia, or thromboembolism. The mortality rate related to embolic events has been reported to be as much as 30%.

Historically, mortality figures from multiple small series have ranged from 7-50%, with half of the deaths occurring within 3 months of delivery. Subsequent case series have found the following mortalities[21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26] :

In the United States, a 15.9% 2-year mortality rate among African American womenIn other US series, a mortality of 3.3-9.6%In South Africa, a mortality of 10-27% at 6 months and 28% at 2 yearsIn Haiti, a mortality of 15% at 2 years

As with any cardiomyopathy, mortality is directly related to recovery of ejection fraction. Patients may not understand this. Women with persistently abnormal ejection fractions are at high risk of developing heart failure and worsening cardiac function if they become pregnant again. If an abnormal ejection fraction declines further, it will predict a shorter lifespan to spend with any children already born, as well as with family members.

Contractile reserve, as demonstrated on dobutamine stress testing, is correlated with clinical outcome. However, women who have had PPCM and have recovered ventricular function according to transthoracic echocardiography may have decreased contractile reserve during dobutamine stress testing. Women demonstrated to have this abnormality might not tolerate the increased hemodynamic stress of a subsequent pregnancy. To date, appropriate follow-up studies have not been performed.

A cohort of 29 cases available for follow-up reported 4 deaths (14%) and 7 complications (pulmonary embolism, 1 case; hemiplegia, 1 case; subsequent deterioration of heart function, 5 cases).

A 10-year retrospective comparative cohort study included patients if cardiomyopathy was diagnosed before pregnancy (DCM group, n = 8) or if it developed during pregnancy or within 5 months post partum (PPCM group, n = 23) and follow-up data was available. In the PPCM group, there were 3 maternal deaths and 4 heart transplants. In the DCM group, 1 woman with a prepregnancy ejection fraction of 16% underwent transplantation after termination of pregnancy for genetic indications; none of the others had a significant decline in cardiac status.

PreviousNextPatient Education

Patients have the expectation that their pregnancy and delivery will involve nothing but happiness. When severe complications occur, patients feel scared, angry, and helpless. The best approach is to discuss any and all issues with your patient. Do as much as you can to help her and her family understand what is happening.

The author begins the discussion by telling them what the diagnosis is and that we do not know why it happens. Then, he reassures her that this was not due to anything that she did or did not do. That is followed by the plans for evaluation and treatment, with an opportunity for her to ask questions. He repeats this pattern each day. This empowers the patient by involving her in the decision-making process.

Patients today ask very good questions. One should feel comfortable being honest and telling patients and family when one does not have all of the answers, while letting them know that the physician will work to find them. This honesty, combined with an effort to obtain the answer, will solidify your relationship as a caring and competent physician. Consultation with experienced clinicians will help the physician care for the patient and help the patient be sure that all avenues of treatment are being explored.

Many reference texts and articles are available on the treatment of this disorder during pregnancy. Becoming educated about the topic will help one feel more comfortable treating and counseling patients.

A case series from Haiti involving 16 pregnancies in 15 women who became pregnant after an index pregnancy during which they were diagnosed with PPCM showed that during the subsequent pregnancy, 8 women (50%) suffered a worsening of left ventricular function.[27] Of those 8, none developed preeclampsia, 1 died 10 months after delivery, and only 1 had a full recovery of left ventricular function. The authors observed that improvement of left ventricular function may continue for more than 12 months after the index pregnancy.

A report by the same authors found that relapse in a subsequent pregnancy occurred in 46% of those with an ejection fraction less than 55%, but only 17% of those with an ejection fraction greater than 55%.[28]

Prospects for future pregnancy

In women with persistent ventricular dysfunction, future pregnancy is not recommended, because of concern about the ability of the dysfunctional heart to handle the increased cardiovascular workload.

Regarding subsequent pregnancies, a survey found that 78% of women with fully recovered left ventricular function had a normal outcome, compared to only 37% of those with persistent ventricular dysfunction. The complications in the normal group and in the group with residual dysfunction were maternal death (2% and 8%, respectively), live birth (93% and 83%), elective abortions (5% and 17%), and stillbirth (2% and 0%).

In a study involving 44 women who had had PPCM and a total of 60 subsequent pregnancies—28 with normal left ventricular function (group 1) and 16 with ventricular dysfunction (group 2)—the ejection fraction decreased slightly in group 1, but not significantly in group 2. Group 2 had the following complications respective to group 1: heart failure symptoms (44% vs 21%) and mortality (19% vs 0%). Therapeutic abortions were performed more often in group 2 (25% vs 4%).

From a cohort of 29 cases available for follow-up, 4 of 5 women (80%) who became pregnant after the index pregnancy developed recurrent congestive heart failure.

Before a subsequent pregnancy, the following recommendations are appropriate:

Women should undergo echocardiography and, if findings are normal, dobutamine stress echocardiographyPregnancy should not be recommended to women with persistent left ventricular dysfunctionPatients with normal findings upon echocardiography but decreased contractile reserve should be warned that they might not tolerate the increased hemodynamic stresses of pregnancy Patients with full recovery should be told that although a chance of recurrence exists, the mortality is low and the majority of such women have normal pregnancies

Patients often avoid situations because they dread a particular outcome. The drive to become pregnant and bear children is a strong, and not necessarily rational, one that can often overshadow a patient’s sense of dread. The patient may be willing to accept the risk of an adverse outcome, but the physician should make an objective recommendation, document it, and not compromise his or her best medical judgment because of a patient’s emotional desires.

Previous, Peripartum Cardiomyopathy

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Background

Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) is a rare disease of the myocardium and is the least common of the 3 clinically recognized and described cardiomyopathies.[1] Its principal abnormality is diastolic dysfunction—specifically, restricted ventricular filling. RCM accounts for approximately 5% of all cases of primary heart muscle disease.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines RCM as a myocardial disease characterized by restrictive filling and reduced diastolic volume of either or both ventricles with normal or near-normal systolic function and wall thickness. Increased interstitial fibrosis may be present. This disease may be idiopathic or associated with other diseases (eg, amyloidosis and endomyocardial disease with or without hypereosinophilia). The course of RCM varies, depending on the pathology and treatment, but is often unsatisfactory.

The importance of an accurate diagnosis of RCM is to distinguish this condition from constrictive pericarditis, a clinically and hemodynamically similar entity that also presents with restrictive physiology but is frequently curable by surgical intervention. This distinction is difficult to make but crucial because the treatment options and prognoses for the 2 conditions differ drastically.[2]

In the past, the correct diagnosis of RCM was frequently not made until surgical inspection demonstrated the pericardium of normal thickness and appearing normal. A subsequent myocardial biopsy would prove the diagnosis of RCM. With the improvement in diagnostic imaging, the necessity of progressing to surgical intervention to confirm the diagnosis of RCM (or constrictive pericarditis) should decrease.

NextPathophysiology

RCM can be idiopathic or secondary to a heart muscle disease that manifests as restrictive physiology.[1, 3] The disease creates increased stiffness of the myocardium, which causes pressure within the ventricles to rise precipitously with small increases in volume. Thus, accentuated filling occurs in early diastole, which terminates abruptly at the end of the rapid filling phase. When pressure tracings are taken at this point, they show a characteristic diastolic “dip-and-plateau” or “square-root” pattern, both similar to constrictive pericarditis.[4]

Patients typically have diastolic heart failure, meaning that systolic function is normal but the left ventricle has increased diastolic stiffness (reduced compliance) and cannot fill adequately at normal diastolic pressures, leading to reduced cardiac output as a result of reduced left ventricular filling volume. Systolic function usually remains normal, at least early in the disease; wall thickness is typically increased secondary to myocardial infiltration with amyloidosis, but the increase is usually not as pronounced as that observed in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

A variable reduction in systolic function may be present as the disease progresses. Reduced left ventricular filling volume leads to reduced stroke volume and low cardiac output symptoms (eg, fatigue, lethargy), whereas increased filling pressures cause pulmonary and systemic congestion. Thus, RCM causes symptoms and signs of left-side failure, right-side failure, or both because it affects both ventricles, but amyloidosis typically presents with dominant right-side fluid retention.

Some patients may have complete heart block as a consequence of fibrosis encasing the sinoatrial or the atrioventricular nodes. Interestingly, amyloid deposition in the bundle branches is rare.

On the basis of pathology, RCM can be classified as obliterative (ie, thrombus-filled ventricles) or nonobliterative/idiopathic.

Obliterative RCM is very rare. It may result from the end stage of the eosinophilic syndromes, in which an intracavitary thrombus fills the left ventricular apex and hampers the filling of the ventricles. The fibrosis of the endocardium may extend to involve the atrioventricular valves and cause regurgitation. Two forms of endomyocardial fibrosis (EMF) exist—an active inflammatory eosinophilia and chronic EMF.

In idiopathic (primary) RCM, progressive fibrosis of the myocardium occurs, but no thrombus forms. This entity also is said to lack specific histopathologic changes.

PreviousNextEtiology

RCM may be caused by various local and systemic disorders; many of them are rare and unlikely to be observed in the United States. These causes may be grouped into 4 broad categories as follows:

IdiopathicInfiltrativeTreatment-inducedMalignancy

According to WHO guidelines, the term “cardiomyopathy” refers to diseases of the myocardium that are idiopathic (ie, primary cardiomyopathies). However, secondary infiltrative myocardial diseases, which are actually cardiac manifestations of systemic diseases, often are grouped together with cardiomyopathies.[5]

Idiopathic RCM may be caused by EMF or by Loeffler eosinophilic endomyocardial disease. Secondary restrictive cardiomyopathy may be caused by the following:

HemochromatosisAmyloidosis[6] (the most common cause of RCM in the United States) SarcoidosisProgressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)Carcinoid heart diseaseGlycogen storage disease of the heartRadiationMetastatic malignancyAnthracycline toxicityIdiopathic/primary RCM

A subset of patients have heart muscle disease of unknown cause that is manifested by heart failure and restrictive hemodynamics but is not characterized by significant ventricular hypertrophy, endocardial thickening or fibrosis, associated eosinophilia, or other diagnostically distinct histopathologic changes.

Males and females have been affected equally, but the prognosis appears to be worse in children than in adults. Children require relatively high filling pressures for maintenance of systolic output, and the therapeutic margin between volume depletion (leading to low output) and volume overload (leading to congestive heart failure) is narrow. A familial pattern has been noted in some cases.

In addition to the presenting symptoms of right- and left-side heart failure, as many as one third of patients with idiopathic RCM may present with thromboembolic complications. Pathologically, these patients have strikingly dilated atria, which may account for the increased cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiography. Echocardiography shows bilateral atrial enlargement with normal ventricular size but significant diffuse left ventricular hypertrophy, especially with amyloidosis. Histologic features include interstitial fibrosis, which is minimal in some and extensive in others.

Amyloidosis

Amyloidosis is characterized by intercellular accumulation of amyloid material in amounts sufficient to impair the function of the involved organs. On the basis of the amyloid protein composition, amyloidosis is classified into 4 different varieties as follows:

Primary or myeloma-related amyloidosisSecondary amyloidosis (ie, secondary to chronic diseases)Senile amyloidosisFamilial amyloidosis

The cardiac involvement in primary amyloidosis most commonly is associated with restrictive physiology. Amyloid infiltration of the heart is common in the elderly population (systemic senile amyloidosis) and may exhibit impaired diastolic filling properties but has other features that are more typical of a dilated cardiomyopathy.

The myeloma protein fibrils composed of immunoglobulin light chains are deposited diffusely throughout the myocardium and create a firm and rubbery consistency. Typically, the heart does not collapse when removed from the chest during autopsy.

On histologic examination, interstitial deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in all 4 cardiac chambers is observed. This can result in increased wall thickness without cavity dilatation.

Involvement of the valves may create regurgitant lesions, but hemodynamically and clinically significant degree of regurgitation is unusual.

The granular sparkling (ie, scintillating) appearance on 2-dimensional echocardiography may be present and is typical, but not diagnostic, of cardiac amyloidosis. Echocardiography more typically shows biventricular thickening out of proportion to current or prior hypertension, biatrial enlargement, a restrictive filling pattern by Doppler echocardiography, and normal systolic function and ejection fraction until late in the disease.

In the early stages of the disease, typical restrictive hemodynamics may not be evident; however, in more advanced cases, typical restrictive hemodynamics are more likely. A corollary of these observations is that restrictive diastolic dynamics strongly predict cardiac death in patients with amyloidosis. Cardiac biopsy is needed to confirm the diagnosis if doubt remains after noninvasive tests.

Eosinophilic cardiomyopathy and EMF

Severe prolonged eosinophilia from any cause (eg, allergic, autoimmune, parasitic, leukemic, or idiopathic) can lead to eosinophilic infiltration of the myocardium. The intracytoplasmic granular content of activated eosinophils is believed to be responsible for the toxic damage to the heart. This eosinophilic cardiomyopathy, also known as Loeffler endocarditis, is associated with dense EMF, intraventricular thrombus formation, and obliteration of the ventricular cavity in its late stages; accordingly, it is included in the category of obliterative RCM.

EMF, which is observed exclusively in equatorial Africa and less frequently in Asia and South America, was believed to be the end stage of eosinophilic endomyocarditis. However, it now is considered a separate entity because it does not exhibit eosinophilia. EMF demonstrates pathology that is similar to that described above (Loeffler endocarditis) and therefore is grouped under obliterative RCM.

The prognosis is poor for patients with diffuse involvement of the heart in EMF, but localized lesions involving the valves are amenable to surgical repair or removal and replacement.

Postirradiation fibrosis

Radiation-induced myocardial and endocardial fibrosis also can cause RCM. However, this complication of radiotherapy, like pericardial constriction, is evident several years after treatment. Differentiating between constriction and restriction may be particularly difficult in these patients because the 2 conditions may coexist.

PreviousNextEpidemiology

Idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy is observed mainly in the United States. Loeffler endocarditis is common in the temperate zone, and chronic EMF is observed in the tropics. EMF occurs most commonly in children and young adults in tropical and subtropical Africa, primarily in Uganda and Nigeria.[7] EMF may account for up to one fourth of deaths due to cardiac disease in those areas

PreviousNextPrognosis

The course of RCM varies depending on the pathology, and treatment is often unsatisfactory. Prognosis generally is poor in the adult population, with progressive deterioration. The natural history of RCM is especially poor in children with heart failure. Adults experience a prolonged course of heart failure and may have complications of cardiac cirrhosis and thromboembolism. Patients who are refractory to supportive therapy usually die of low-output cardiac failure unless cardiac transplantation is an option.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Restrictive Cardiomyopathy

Saturday, January 4, 2014

Overview

The focus of this review is on the effects of alcohol on the myocardium and its role as a cause of heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DC). For nearly 150 years, alcohol consumption has been associated with a variety of cardiovascular diseases. Observations during the second half of the 19th century described cardiac enlargement seen at autopsy and heart failure symptoms in persons who had consumed excessive amounts of alcohol.

During the first half of the 20th century, the concept of beriberi heart disease (ie, thiamine deficiency) was present throughout the medical literature, and the idea that alcohol had any direct effect on the myocardium was doubted. Epidemics of heart failure in persons who had consumed beer contaminated with arsenic in the 1900s and cobalt in the 1960s also obscured the observation that alcohol could exhibit a direct toxic effect. In the 1950s, evidence began to emerge that supported the idea of a direct toxic myocardial effect of alcohol, and research during the last 25 years has been particularly productive in characterizing the disease entity of alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC).

Ultimately, AC is a clinical diagnosis made in a patient presenting with a constellation of findings that includes a history of excessive alcohol intake, possible physical signs of alcohol abuse (eg, parotid disease, telangiectasia or spider angiomata, mental status changes, cirrhosis), heart failure, and supportive evidence consistent with DC. Hypertension due to alcohol may be a confounding comorbidity in that it may contribute to LV dysfunction; therefore, LV dysfunction due to hypertension must be differentiated from pure AC.

Proposed mechanisms of injury in AC include the following:

Inhibition of protein synthesisInhibition of oxidative phosphorylationFatty acid ester accumulationFree radical damageInhibition of calcium-myofilament interactionInflammatory and immunologic factorsReceptor abnormalitiesDisruption of cell membrane structureCoronary vasospasmSynergy with concomitant conditionsActivation of the renin-angiotensin system[1]

Alcohol use has also been shown to have numerous effects on the cardiovascular system other than heart failure. It has been associated with arrhythmia (eg, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, other supraventricular arrhythmia, premature ventricular contractions), hypertension, stroke, and sudden death. In addition, the literature reports alcohol withdrawal being associated with takotsubo, or stress-induced, cardiomyopathy. On the other hand, numerous studies have demonstrated that light to moderate alcohol consumption (ie, 1-2 drinks per d or 3-9 drinks per wk) decreases the risk of cardiac events such as myocardial infarction.

Patient education

For patient education information, see the Mental Health Center, as well as Alcoholism, Alcohol Intoxication, Drug Dependence and Abuse, and Substance Abuse.

NextCardiac Effects of Alcohol

Long-term alcohol use has been implicated as the etiology of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in as many as one third of cases of DC. The mechanism by which alcohol causes cardiac damage remains unclear. Over many years, several theories have arisen based on clinical and scientific data obtained in human and animal studies.

The original theories regarding the mechanism focused on nutritional deficiencies (eg, thiamine deficiency), secondary exposures (eg, tobacco, cobalt, arsenic), and other comorbidities (eg, hypertension). However, although these mechanisms may play a role in selected patients, most evidence in the literature indicates that the effects of alcohol on the myocardium are independent of these factors and that the effect is a direct toxic result of ethanol or its metabolites.

Some studies have suggested that a genetic vulnerability exists to the myocardial effects of alcohol consumption. Individuals with certain mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mutations and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotypes (DD genotype) may be particularly susceptible to the damaging effects of alcohol. Exactly how these genetic variables create this higher risk is not known.

In addition, alcohol has been shown to have a negative effect on net protein synthesis. Many studies have shown this result, and it remains a topic of ongoing investigation and speculation. The exact manner in which alcohol produces this effect is not known, but the effect is consistent, is observed throughout the heart, and may be exaggerated under stressful conditions.

To identify the causative agent of alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC), investigators administered ethanol to rats pretreated with inhibitors of ethanol metabolism. Use of ethanol alone or ethanol with an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor resulted in a 25% decrease in protein synthesis. When the rats were given an inhibitor of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase to increase levels of the ethanol metabolite acetaldehyde, an 80% decrease in protein synthesis occurred. Based on these data, acute ethanol-induced injury appears to be mediated by ethanol and acetaldehyde; the latter may play a more important role.

Acetaldehyde is a potent oxidant and, as such, increases oxidative stress, leading to the formation of oxygen radicals, with subsequent endothelial and tissue dysfunction. Acetaldehyde may also result in impairment of mitochondrial phosphorylation. Mitochondria play an essential role in cellular metabolism, and disruption of their function can have profound effects on the entire cell. The myocyte mitochondria in the hearts of persons exposed to alcohol are clearly abnormal in structure, and many believe that this may be an important factor in the development of AC.

A study in a rat model using an alcohol dehydrogenase transgene that results in elevated levels of acetaldehyde demonstrated a change in calcium metabolism at the intracellular level and a decrease in peak shortening and shortening velocity. This was interpreted by the authors as suggesting that acetaldehyde plays a key role in the cardiac dysfunction seen after alcohol intake. Others have suggested that an acute decrease in mitochondrial glutathione content may play a role in mitochondrial damage and implicate oxidative stress as a contributor in this process.

The formation of fatty acid ethyl esters during the metabolism of alcohol and specific genetic defects in fatty acid ethyl ester synthase (which metabolizes these esters and may predispose individuals to these toxic effects) have been proposed to result in further impairment of mitochondrial phosphorylation. Acetaldehyde has also been associated with coronary vasospasm and the release of troponin T in the acute setting. The latter effect can be blocked by the administration of propranolol, implicating beta-adrenergic stimulation as an effect of acetaldehyde.

Other proposed mechanisms of injury include a direct inhibition of calcium-myofilament interaction, free radical induced lipopigment accumulation within the myocyte and inhibition of protein synthesis, an inflammatory or myocarditislike response (possibly secondary to antibodies formed against protein-acetaldehyde adducts), reduced receptor expression, abnormal membrane structure, disruption of zinc homeostasis, and an increase in myocardial superoxide dismutase activity (resulting in an antioxidant imbalance).[2]

PreviousNextQuantity of Alcohol Intake in Cardiac Disease

Excessive intake of alcohol may result in increased systemic blood pressure in a dose-response relationship, and this may contribute to chronic myocardial dysfunction. Patients who consume more than 2 drinks per day have a 1.5- to 2-fold increase in hypertension compared with persons who do not drink alcohol, and this effect is most prominent when the daily intake of alcohol exceeds 5 drinks. Because hypertension may directly contribute to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, this may be a confounding comorbidity in persons who abuse alcohol, and it should be differentiated from pure forms of AC.

In 1989, Urbano-Marquez et al reported on 48 men with alcohol abuse with a mean daily intake of 243 g of alcohol and showed (1) an inverse relationship between total lifetime intake and ejection fraction and fractional shortening and (2) a direct relationship between total lifetime intake and LV mass. In persons who consumed 70 g of ethanol (or the equivalent of 7 oz of whiskey, 20 oz of wine, or 72 oz of beer [ie, six 12-oz cans]) per day for 20 years, 36% had an abnormal ejection fraction. Age and nutritional status appeared to play little or no role.[3]

In a 1986 study, Richardson et al concluded that continuous, rather than episodic, drinking was a major risk factor for the development of heart failure and that this effect was unrelated to the hypertensive effect of alcohol. In the study, the authors evaluated 38 patients with nonischemic DC. Of these persons, 18 were classified as heavy drinkers (ie, 80 g/d or a lifetime dose of 250 kg), and 20 were classified as abstinent or light drinkers. Those classified as heavy drinkers all were men who predominantly drank beer.[4]

Other studies and reviews have also quoted quantities similar to those mentioned above, and the type of beverage consumed appeared to be irrelevant.

Binge drinking induces a systemic inflammatory reaction, which may lead to alcohol-induced myocardial inflammation. One study indicated that patients who repeatedly expose themselves to excessive amounts of alcohol may demonstrate evidence on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of alcohol-induced myocardial inflammation but not show deterioration in indices of LV performance. The study did not provide evidence of an absolute acute risk of cardiac events involved with binge drinking, and the clinical significance of the findings requires further investigation.[5]

PreviousNextEpidemiologySex-related demographics

Currently available data indicate that certain aspects of alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC) are affected by the patient's sex. Several authors have reported that although AC is a disease that affects males more often than females (due to a higher rate of alcohol abuse in men), females may be more sensitive to alcohol's cardiotoxic effects.

In 1997, Fernandez-Sola and colleagues evaluated 10 women and 26 men who were alcohol abusers and reported a similar prevalence of cardiomyopathy in the males and females, despite a lower total lifetime alcohol dose in the women.[6]

In 1995, Urbano-Marquez described similar results in a study of 50 women and 100 men who abused alcohol. The authors reported a lifetime dose of alcohol in the female group that was 60% of that in the male group, but they found an equal incidence of cardiomyopathy and myopathy in the males and females.[7]

Based on their work with a rat model, Jankala and colleagues suggested a link between lower levels of p53 mRNA expression and female susceptibility to the development of AC.[8]

Age-related demographics

Alcoholic cardiomyopathy is a disease that primarily affects persons of at least middle age and is observed less commonly in those younger than age 40 years, although preclinical cardiac abnormalities have been demonstrated in persons engaging in chronic alcohol abuse. This is believed to be due primarily to the fact that alcohol must be consumed excessively for at least 10 years to have a clinically relevant effect on the myocardium.

PreviousNextPrognosis

The natural history of patients with alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC) depends greatly on each patient's ability to cease alcohol consumption completely. Multiple case reports and small retrospective and prospective studies have clearly documented marked improvement in or, in some patients, normalization of cardiac function with abstinence. The following reports and studies provide impressive data on the utility of abstinence and the confirmation of alcohol consumption as a cause of DC.

Nakanishi et al identified 11 patients with AC and reported significant improvement in 8 of them after they abstained from alcohol use. In addition, a marked worsening was seen in the 3 patients who continued to abuse alcohol, including death from heart failure in 2 patients.[9]

A 12-month observational study of 20 patients with AC noted smaller cavity diameters, better clinical evaluation findings, and fewer hospitalizations in the 10 patients who abstained from alcohol use.

Guillo and colleagues evaluated 14 patients with AC over a 3-year period with serial examinations, electrocardiograms (ECGs), stress tests, echocardiograms, and MUGA scans. Of the 3 patients who continued to drink, 1 was lost to follow-up and 2 died. One patient underwent heart transplantation within the 3 years of follow-up observation, and 1 patient died from tamponade after an endomyocardial biopsy. Nine of the original 14 patients completed the 36-month follow-up period, 6 patients had marked improvement in symptoms and increased ejection fractions. The other 3 patients had no change in ejection fraction, one patient cut back alcohol consumption, and another patient resumed use after a period of abstinence.[10]

A 1- and 4-year follow-up study of 55 men with alcoholism showed that abstinence and controlled drinking of up to 60 g/day (4 drinks) resulted in comparable improvement in LV ejection fraction. Ten patients who continued to drink higher amounts of alcohol all died during the follow-up period.

Demakis and colleagues found that, overall, the 2 factors that were associated with a better prognosis in AC were abstinence and a shorter duration of symptoms before the initiation of therapy. In their study, perhaps the largest evaluation of the natural history of AC, the investigators prospectively followed 57 patients with AC and divided them into 3 groups: 15 patients who improved clinically, 12 patients who remained stable, and 30 patients whose conditions deteriorated. Of the 39 patients who continued to drink, only 4 patients improved. Eleven of the 18 patients who abstained improved; however, the condition of 3 patients who abstained continued to deteriorate.[11]

In 1996, Prazak et al conducted a retrospective study comparing 23 patients with AC to 52 patients with idiopathic DC and found that the 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates for AC were 100%, 81%, and 81%, respectively, compared with 89%, 48%, and 30%, respectively, for idiopathic DC. When transplant-free survival was compared between the 2 groups, the difference was more impressive, with 10-year survival rates of 81% and 20% for the AC and idiopathic DC patients, respectively. The 2 groups had similar ejection fractions, New York Heart Association class symptoms, and overall LV volume. The sole endpoint was all-cause mortality.[12]

In contrast to the Prazak study, a 1993 study by Redfield et al showed no difference in mortality between patients with AC and those with idiopathic DC.[13] Prazak et al speculated that the outcomes in the reports may have differed because the patients in their study observed more complete abstinence and underwent aggressive medical therapy.[12]

Alcoholic cardiomyopathy and cirrhosis

For many years, people who abused alcohol and had cirrhosis were believed to be spared from the cardiotoxic effects of alcohol; conversely, those with cardiomyopathy were believed to be spared from cirrhosis. However, research has shown that this almost certainly is not the case. In a study, Estruch et al found that persons who abused alcohol and had been hospitalized solely for cardiomyopathy had a higher incidence of cirrhosis than did alcohol abusers who did not have heart disease.[14]

PreviousNextPatient History

Similar to the pathologic findings, the symptoms of alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC) are essentially the same as those associated with other forms of DC. Dyspnea, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea are the hallmark complaints, but chest discomfort, fatigue, palpitations, dizziness, syncope, anorexia, and many others are not uncommon.

The onset of symptoms is usually insidious, but acute decompensations are also observed, especially in patients with asymptomatic LV dysfunction who develop atrial fibrillation or other tachyarrhythmia and, because of this, are unable to increase their cardiac output.

Ask any patient presenting with new heart failure of unclear etiology about their alcohol history, with attention to daily, maximal, and lifetime intake and the duration of that intake. Several important studies have clearly shown a dose-dependent effect.

PreviousNextPhysical Examination

Physical examination findings in AC are not unique compared with findings in DC from other causes. Elevated systemic blood pressure may reflect excessive intake of alcohol, but not alcoholic cardiomyopathy per se.

Frequently, a relative decrease occurs in systolic blood pressure because of reduced cardiac output and increased diastolic blood pressure due to peripheral vasoconstriction, resulting in a decrease in the pulse pressure.

Cardiac percussion and palpation reveal evidence of an enlarged heart with a laterally displaced and diffuse point of maximal impulse. Auscultation can help to reveal the apical murmur of mitral regurgitation and the lower parasternal murmur of tricuspid regurgitation secondary to papillary muscle displacement and dysfunction. Third and fourth heart sounds can be heard, and they signify systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Pulmonary rales signify pulmonary congestion secondary to elevated left atrial and LV end-diastolic pressures. Jugular venous distention, peripheral edema, and hepatomegaly are evidence of elevated right heart pressures and right ventricular dysfunction.

Other findings may include cool extremities with decreased pulses and generalized cachexia, muscle atrophy, and weakness due to chronic heart failure and/or the direct effect of chronic alcohol consumption.

PreviousNextLaboratory Studies

Results from serum chemistry evaluations have not been shown to be useful for distinguishing patients with alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC) from those with other forms of DC. Results from evaluations of mean cell volume, aspartate aminotransferase levels, alanine aminotransferase levels, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels have been shown to be similar in persons with AC to those in persons with other forms of DC. However, results from tissue assays have been shown to be potentially helpful in distinguishing AC from other forms of DC.

Richardson et al showed an elevation of creatine kinase, LDH, malic dehydrogenase, and alpha-hydroxybutyric dehydrogenase levels in endomyocardial biopsy specimens taken from 38 patients with DC.

PreviousNextImaging Studies

Chest radiographs usually show evidence of cardiac enlargement, pulmonary congestion, and pleural effusions.

Results from resting and stress nuclear imaging techniques (eg, stress testing with thallium and sestamibi imaging, multiple gated acquisition [MUGA] scanning, positron emission tomography [PET scanning]) may be useful for evaluating cardiac size and function and for screening for coronary disease.

Echocardiography

Echocardiography is perhaps the most useful initial diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients with heart failure. Because of the ease and speed of the test and its noninvasive nature, it is the study of choice in the initial and follow-up evaluation of most forms of cardiomyopathy. In addition, it provides information not only on overall heart size and function, but on valvular structure and function, wall motion and thickness, and pericardial disease.

Echocardiographic findings in persons with AC, which are similar to those in persons with idiopathic DC, are as follows:

4-chamber dilatationGlobally decreased ventricular functionMitral and tricuspid regurgitationPulmonary hypertensionEvidence of diastolic dysfunction - These changes can be seen even in the absence of systolic dysfunction but seem to be more prevalent in patients with coexisting systolic dysfunction; the progression of diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic individuals may be related to the duration of alcoholism Intracardiac thrombi (atrial or ventricular)LV hypertrophyPreviousNextElectrocardiography

Electrocardiographic findings are frequently abnormal, and these findings may be the only indication of heart disease in asymptomatic patients.

Palpitations, dizziness, and syncope are common complaints and are frequently caused by arrhythmias (eg, atrial fibrillation, flutter) and premature contractions. In the setting of acute alcohol use or intoxication, this is called holiday heart syndrome, because the incidence is increased following weekends and during holiday seasons.

Other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden death have also been associated with alcohol use and alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC), with the latter being most likely secondary to the development of ventricular fibrillation. Conduction disturbances, such as degrees of atrioventricular block, left or right bundle-branch block, and hemiblocks, are also observed.

Criteria associated with LV hypertrophy with a repolarization abnormality, prolonged repolarization (ie, QT interval), nonspecific ST- and T-wave changes, and Q waves have also been described.

PreviousNextCardiac Catheterization

In patients with DC, if additional questions remain after a history is obtained and noninvasive testing is performed, cardiac catheterization may be used to help exclude other etiologies of heart failure.

Although the most common cause of heart failure is coronary artery disease, ischemic cardiomyopathy is unlikely in the absence of a clear history of prior ischemic events or angina and in the absence of Q waves on the ECG strip. In most patients, exercise or pharmacologic stress testing with echocardiographic or nuclear imaging is an appropriate screening test for heart failure due to coronary artery disease.

In addition to the assessment of the status of the coronary arteries, cardiac catheterization may help obtain useful information regarding cardiac output, the degree of aortic or mitral valvular disease, and cardiac hemodynamics and filling pressures. Importantly however, remember that much of this information can be derived or inferred from the results of noninvasive testing.

In persons with AC, common findings after catheterization include nonobstructive coronary disease; elevated LV end-diastolic pressure, wedge pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and right heart pressure; increased LV size with decreased overall function; and mild or moderate mitral regurgitation. Regional wall motion abnormalities are not uncommon, but they are usually less prominent than those observed in persons with ischemic heart disease.

PreviousNextHistologic Findings

The pathologic and histologic findings of alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC) are essentially indistinguishable from those of other forms of DC. Findings from gross examination include an enlarged heart with 4-chamber dilatation and overall increased cardiac mass. Histologically, light microscopy reveals interstitial fibrosis (a finding that has been shown to be prevented by zinc supplementation in the mouse model), myocyte necrosis with hypertrophy of other myocytes, and evidence of inflammation. Electron microscopy reveals mitochondrial enlargement and disorganization, dilatation of the sarcoplasmic reticulum, fat and glycogen deposition, and dilatation of the intercalating discs.

Although the qualitative properties of AC and other forms of DC may be similar, quantitative differences may exist.

Comparing 20 patients who had AC with 10 patients with DC, Teragaki and colleagues reported less myocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis in patients with AC, found a greater improvement of cardiac size with treatment or abstinence in the AC group, and noted that the cardiac index was higher in patients with AC who had less fibrosis.[15, 16]

In the 1989 study by Urbano-Marquez et al, a comparison of symptomatic to asymptomatic patients revealed more extensive fibrosis in patients with symptoms.[3] Other investigators have looked at immunohistologic markers and have suggested that the presence of these markers might suggest an inflammatory process such as myocarditis and that their absence may point more toward AC or an idiopathic etiology.

PreviousNextAlcohol Abstention and Pharmacologic Therapies

The mainstay of therapy for alcoholic cardiomyopathy (AC) is to treat the underlying cause, ie, to have the patient exercise complete and perpetual abstinence from all alcohol consumption. The efficacy of abstinence has been shown in persons with early disease (eg, prior to the onset of severe myocardial fibrosis) and in individuals with more advanced disease (see Prognosis).

Medical therapy for AC is identical to conventional therapy for other forms of heart failure. This includes treatment with an ACE inhibitor and with digoxin (for patients with symptomatic LV dysfunction), as well as the symptomatic use of diuretics. Newer therapies, such as beta blockers in stable patients without decompensated heart failure, are also used.

Electrolyte abnormalities, including hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypophosphatemia, should be corrected promptly because of the risk of arrhythmia and sudden death.

Although anticoagulation may be of benefit to patients with profound LV dysfunction and atrial fibrillation, the risks must be weighed heavily in this patient population.

Thiamine (200 mg once daily), multivitamins, vitamin B-12, folate, and mineral supplementation are beneficial for patients with AC because of the significant prevalence of concomitant nutritional or electrolyte deficiencies in these patients. Animal studies have suggested a benefit from vitamins B-1 and B-12, speculated to be due to protective effects against apoptosis and protein damage.

A summary of the treatment for AC is as follows:

Abstention from alcoholVasodilators - ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (the work of Cheng and colleagues in 2006 suggested that these may prevent the development of AC[17] ), nitrates, hydralazineDigoxinDiureticsBeta blockersAnticoagulation (possibly)Intravenous inotropic agentsCardiac transplantationPrevious, Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy