Showing posts with label Ventricular. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ventricular. Show all posts

Sunday, March 9, 2014

Background

Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) is caused by an ectopic cardiac pacemaker located in the ventricle. PVCs are characterized by premature and bizarrely shaped QRS complexes usually wider than 120 msec on with the width of the ECG. These complexes are not preceded by a P wave, and the T wave is usually large, and its direction is opposite the major deflection of the QRS.

The clinical significance of PVCs depends on their frequency, complexity, and hemodynamic response.

For additional information, see Medscape's Cardiology Specialty page.

NextPathophysiology

Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) reflect activation of the ventricles from a site below the atrioventricular node (AVN). Suggested mechanisms for PVCs are reentry, triggered activity, and enhanced automaticity.

Reentry occurs when an area of 1-way block in the Purkinje fibers and a second area of slow conduction are present. This condition is frequently seen in patients with underlying heart disease that creates areas of differential conduction and recovery due to myocardial scarring or ischemia. During ventricular activation, the area of slow conduction activates the blocked part of the system after the rest of the ventricle has recovered, resulting in an extra beat. Reentry can produce single ectopic beats, or it can trigger paroxysmal tachycardia.

Triggered beats are considered to be due to after-depolarizations triggered by the preceding action potential. These are often seen in patients with ventricular arrhythmias due to digoxin toxicity and reperfusion therapy after myocardial infarction (MI).

Enhanced automaticity suggests an ectopic focus of pacemaker cells in the ventricle that has a subthreshold potential for firing. The basic rhythm of the heart raises these cells to threshold, which precipitates an ectopic beat. This process is the underlying mechanism for arrhythmias due to excess catecholamines and some electrolyte deficiencies, particularly hyperkalemia.

Ventricular ectopy associated with a structurally normal heart most commonly occurs from the right ventricular outflow tract beneath the pulmonic valve. The mechanism is thought to be enhanced automaticity versus triggered activity. These arrhythmias are often induced by exercise, isoproterenol (in the EP lab), the recovery phase of exercise, or hormonal changes in female patients (pregnancy, menses, menopause). The characteristic ECG pattern for these arrhythmias is a large, tall R wave in the inferior leads with a left bundle-branch block pattern in V 1 . If the source is the left ventricular outflow tract, there is a right bundle-branch block pattern in V 1 . Beta-blocker therapy is first-line therapy if symptomatic.

Factors that increase the risk of PVCs include male sex, advanced age, African American race, hypertension and underlying ischemic heart disease, a bundle-branch block on 12-lead ECG, hypomagnesemia, and hypokalemia.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequencyUnited States

Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are one of the most common arrhythmias and can occur in patients with or without heart disease. The prevalence of PVCs varies greatly, with estimates of less than 3% to more than 60% in asymptomatic individuals.

Data from large, population-based studies indicate that the prevalence ranges from less than 3% for young white women without heart disease to almost 20% for older African American individuals with hypertension.

Mortality/Morbidity

The clinical significance of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) depends on the clinical context in which they occur.

PVCs in young, healthy patients without underlying structural heart disease are usually not associated with any increased rate of mortality. PVCs in older patients, in particular those with underlying heart disease, are associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiac events, particularly sustained ventricular dysrhythmias and sudden death. In patients who have had a MI, the risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death is related to the complexity and frequency of the PVCs. Patients with PVCs in Lown classes 3-5 are at greatest risk (see Lown grading criteria below). Frequent PVCs may be associated with increased risk of stroke in patients who do not have hypertension and diabetes.[1] Race

African American race is associated with an increased frequency of PVCs on routine monitoring.[2] In a large population-based study of PVC prevalence, African American race alone increased the risk of PVCs by 30% compared with the risk in white individuals.

Sex

Ventricular ectopy is more prevalent in men than in women of the same age. Male sex alone increases the risk of identifying PVCs on routine screening, with an odds ratio for male sex of 1.39 compared with women.

Age

PVC frequency increases with age, reflecting the increased prevalence of hypertension and cardiac disease in aging populations.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Premature Ventricular Contraction

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Background

Ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) are ectopic impulses originating from an area distal to the His Purkinje system. VPCs are the most common ventricular arrhythmia. Assessment and treatment of VPCs is challenging and complex. The significance of VPCs is interpreted in the context of the underlying cardiac condition.

The approach to the evaluation and management of VPCs has undergone dramatic changes in the last decade. Ventricular ectopy leading to ventricular tachycardia (VT), which, in turn, can degenerate into ventricular fibrillation, is one of the common mechanisms for sudden cardiac death. The treatment paradigm in the 1970s and 1980s was to eliminate VPCs in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). The CAST and other arrhythmia suppression studies have demonstrated that eliminating VPCs with available antiarrhythmic drugs increases the risk of death to patients without providing any measurable benefit.

NextPathophysiology

Very few studies have evaluated the pathophysiology of VPCs in human subjects. Most of the information is derived from animal studies. Three common mechanisms exist for VPCs, (1) automaticity, (2) reentry, and (3) triggered activity, as follows:

Automaticity: This is the development of a new site of depolarization in nonnodal ventricular tissue, which can lead to a VPC. In animal models, focal mechanisms without evidence of macro-reentry play a major role in the origin of ventricular arrhythmia associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Increased automaticity could be due to electrolyte abnormalities or ischemic myocardium. Reentry circuit: Reentry typically occurs when slow-conducting tissue (eg, infarcted myocardium) is present adjacent to normal tissue. The slow-conducting tissue could be due to damaged myocardium, as in the case of a healed MI. Triggered activity: After depolarizations triggered by a preceding impulse can lead to premature activation if the threshold is reached, and this can cause a VPC. Afterdepolarization can occur either during (early) or after (late) completion of repolarization. Early afterdepolarizations commonly are responsible for bradycardia associated VPCs, but they also can be present with ischemia and electrolyte abnormalities. PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequencyUnited States

The reported prevalence of VPCs varies between studies, depending on the population studied, duration of observation, and method of detection. In asymptomatic patients, VPCs are infrequent when only a single 12-lead ECG is used for screening. The Framingham heart study (with 1-h ambulatory ECG) suggested that the prevalence rate of 1 or more VPCs per hour was 33% in men without coronary artery disease (CAD) and 32% in women without CAD. Among patients with CAD, the prevalence rate of 1 or more VPCs was 58% in men and 49% in women. Other studies using 24-hour ambulatory monitoring showed a VPC prevalence rate of 41% in healthy teenage boys aged 14-16 years, 50-60% in healthy young adults, and 84% in healthy elderly persons aged 73-82 years. VPCs also are common in patients with hypertension, ventricular hypertrophy, cardiomyopathy, and mitral valve prolapse.

International

Data from the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza dell'Infarto Miocardico 2 study demonstrated that 64% of patients who had MI then had ventricular arrhythmia and 20% of patients had more than 10 VPCs per hour when 24-h Holter monitoring was used.

Mortality/Morbidity

Prognosis depends on the frequency and characteristics of VPCs and on the type and severity of associated structural heart disease. VPCs are associated with an increased risk of death, especially when CAD is diagnosed, but the relationship between VPC frequency and mortality, even in this group, is not robust and no benefit results in suppressing VPCs to improve survival in any population.

In asymptomatic patients, frequent ventricular ectopy (defined as a run of 2 or more consecutive premature ventricular depolarizations or with premature ventricular depolarizations constituting >10% of all ventricular depolarizations on any of the ECG recordings with the subject at rest, during exercise, or during recovery) recorded during exercise testing was associated with 2.5-fold increased risk of cardiovascular death. Less frequent VPCs did not increase the risk. In general, multimorphic VPCs connote a poorer prognosis than uniform morphologic VPCs. In patients post-MI, frequent VPCs (>10/h) are associated with increased mortality in the prethrombolytic era, but the association in patients receiving thrombolysis is weak. In 2 studies, a frequent VPC (defined as the presence of 7 or more ventricular premature beats per minute during any given stage, ventricular bigeminy, ventricular trigeminy, ventricular couplets, ventricular triplets, sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular flutter, torsade de pointes, or ventricular fibrillation) during exercise was an independent predictor of death.[1, 2] However, in another study, frequent VPCs only during exercise did not independently predict an increased risk; instead frequent VPCs during recovery was a stronger predictor of death.[3] Frequent VPCs, especially when they occur in a bigeminal pattern, can precipitate tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy that can be reversed by elimination of the PVCs through catheter ablation.[1, 4, 5] In some circumstances, very frequent VPCs may decrease cardiac systolic function, and suppression by ablation may have a beneficial effect. Caution is in order, primarily because prior attempts at pharmacologic suppression were associated with unexpected and deleterious outcomes.[6] Sex

The Framingham heart study demonstrated increased prevalence of VPCs in men compared with women. The difference was especially higher in men with CAD than in women with CAD.

Age

VPCs are uncommon in children (suggested prevalence rate of 0.8-2.2% from the Vanderbilt Medical Center; exact prevalence not known). Prevalence increases with age.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Ventricular Premature Complexes
Practice Essentials

Most sudden cardiac deaths in the United States are caused by ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), at an estimated rate of approximately 300,000 deaths per year. Ventricular tachycardia refers to any rhythm faster than 100 beats per minute, with 3 or more irregular beats in a row, arising distal to the bundle of His. The rhythm may arise from working ventricular myocardium and/or from the distal conduction system.

Essential update: Safety and efficacy of complete endocardial VT substrate ablation after MI

Complete endocardial ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation (CEVTSA) is safe and effective in patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI), even in those in whom VT substrate has not been identified, according to a study of 59 post-myocardial infarction patients by Arenal and colleagues. Dense scar area and VT cycle length were significant independent predictors of VT recurrence.[1, 2]

Signs and symptoms

History

The symptoms of ventricular tachycardia include the following:

PalpitationLight-headednessSyncopeChest painAnxiety

Physical examination

During VT, the following symptoms may be observed:

HypotensionTachypneaSigns of diminished perfusion: Including a diminished level of consciousness, pallor, and diaphoresisHigh jugular venous pressureCannon a waves: If the atria are in sinus rhythmVariation in intensity of first heart sound: Due to loss of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony

Following conversion, physical findings during normal sinus rhythm are related to any underlying structural heart disease.

VT can also result in sudden death. Patients in whom this occurs may first present with syncope.

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Assess levels of serum electrolytes, including the following, in all patients with VT:

Calcium: Ionized calcium levels are preferred over total serum calcium levelsMagnesiumPhosphate

Hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypocalcemia may predispose patients to either monomorphic VT or torsade de pointes.

Laboratory studies can also include the following:

levels of therapeutic drugs, such as digoxinToxicology screens: May be helpful in those cases related to recreational drug useSerum cardiac troponin I or T levels or other cardiac markers: To evaluate for myocardial ischemia or infarction

VT at acute presentation

In patients who have VT at acute presentation and who are unconscious or hemodynamically unstable, the diagnosis is made from the physical findings and electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm strip.

If circumstances allow, a full 12-lead electrocardiogram should be obtained prior to urgent cardioversion.

Laboratory studies are impractical, and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) protocols must be quickly followed. However, in patients who have VT at acute presentation and are hemodynamically stable, a 12-lead ECG and electrolytes may be obtained prior to attempted conversion with medications or sedation and cardioversion.

VT postconversion

In patients with VT postconversion, diagnosis proceeds as follows:

Repeat the ECG after termination of VTInclude electrolyte levels in an acute evaluationPerform toxicology screens for cocaine metabolites and tricyclic antidepressants: In accordance with the patient’s clinical history Check cardiac enzyme levels: If clinical symptoms or signs of ischemia are presentPerform echocardiography and coronary angiography: Following conversion to sinus rhythm, to assess for structural and ischemic heart disease

Electrophysiologic study

Diagnostic electrophysiologic study (EPS) requires placement of electrode catheters in the ventricle, followed by programmed ventricular stimulation using progressive pacing protocols. EPS is particularly relevant in patients who are felt to be at high risk for sudden death due to significant underlying structural heart disease.

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Medications

The mainstays of treatment for clinically stable VT are the various antidysrhythmic drugs. Intravenous medications are used to suppress acute monomorphic VT; in the United States, these are limited to the following agents:

ProcainamideLidocaineAmiodaroneBeta-adrenergic blocking agents metoprolol, esmolol, and propranolol

ICDs

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology (ACC/AHA/ESC) guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention to reduce total mortality by a reduction in sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with the following characteristics[3] :

Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction due to previous myocardial infarction (MI)At least 40 days post-MILV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30-40% or lessNew York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or IIIReceiving chronic optimal medical therapyReasonably expected to survive with good functional status for more than 1 year

Ablation

Endocardial catheter ablation is used early in idiopathic, monomorphic VT (ie, VT in a structurally normal heart) but can also be used to reduce arrhythmia burden in the presence of cardiomyopathy.

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image libraryThis is a rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardiThis is a rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), 280 beats per minute, associated with hemodynamic collapse. This tracing was obtained from a patient with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy during an electrophysiologic (EP) study. The rhythm later converted to sinus with a single external shock. This patient had an atrial rate of 72 beats per minute (measured with intracardiac electrodes, not shown). Although ventriculoatrial dissociation (faster V rate than A rate) is diagnostic of VT, the surface ECG findings (dissociated P waves, fusion or capture beats) are only present approximately 20% of the time. In this tracing, the ventricular rate is simply too fast for P waves to be observed. VT with cycle lengths from 200-240 ms is often termed ventricular flutter. NextBackground

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) refers to any rhythm faster than 100 (or 120) beats per minute arising distal to the bundle of His. The rhythm may arise from working ventricular myocardium and/or from the distal conduction system. (See Etiology.) Go to Pediatric Ventricular Tachycardia for complete information on this topic.

VT may be reflected in symptoms such as syncope, palpitations, and dyspnea. It is often, but not always, associated with hemodynamic compromise, particularly if the left ventricle is impaired or the heart rate is especially fast. With some exceptions, VT is associated with increased risk of sudden death. (See Etiology, Prognosis, History, Physical Examination, Workup.)

VT generally is a consequence of ischemic or structural heart disease or electrolyte deficiencies (eg, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia). It can also be triggered by the following (see Etiology):

Use of sympathomimetic agents (from intravenous inotropes to illicit drugs such as methamphetamine or cocaine)Systemic diseases that affect the myocardium, such as sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, hemochromatosis, and rheumatoid arthritisOther structural congenital disorders, such as right ventricular dysplasia and tetralogy of FallotDigitalis toxicity - Can lead to biventricular tachycardia.Inherited channelopathies[4] Drugs that prolong the QT complex (eg, type 1A antidysrhythmics, droperidol and related phenothiazines)

Drugs that prolong the QT complex may cause torsade de pointes. (See Etiology.)

Monomorphic and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

VT may be monomorphic (originating from a single focus with identical QRS complexes) or polymorphic (may appear as an irregular rhythm, with varying QRS amplitudes and morphology). Examples of monomorphic and polymorphic VTs are seen below.

This is a rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardiThis is a rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), 280 beats per minute, associated with hemodynamic collapse. This tracing was obtained from a patient with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy during an electrophysiologic (EP) study. The rhythm later converted to sinus with a single external shock. This patient had an atrial rate of 72 beats per minute (measured with intracardiac electrodes, not shown). Although ventriculoatrial dissociation (faster V rate than A rate) is diagnostic of VT, the surface ECG findings (dissociated P waves, fusion or capture beats) are only present approximately 20% of the time. In this tracing, the ventricular rate is simply too fast for P waves to be observed. VT with cycle lengths from 200-240 ms is often termed ventricular flutter. This is a slow monomorphic ventricular tachycardiaThis is a slow monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), 121 beats per minute, from a patient with an old inferior wall myocardial infarction and well-preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction [EF] 55%). He presented with symptoms of palpitation and neck fullness. Note the ventriculoatrial dissociation, most obvious in V2 and V3. Slower VT rates and preserved left ventricular (LV) function are associated with a better long-term prognosis. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Sustained and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia

Nonsustained VT is defined as a run of tachycardia of less than 30 seconds duration; longer runs are considered sustained VT.

While nonsustained ventricular tachycardia is a frequently observed dysrhythmia, sustained, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia is uncommon in the emergency department (ED) setting due to aggressive treatment of myocardial ischemia.

When sustained VT causes signs or symptoms of diminished perfusion, emergent treatment is necessary.

Electrocardiography in ventricular tachycardia

No absolute electrocardiographic criteria exist for establishing the presence of VT. However, several factors suggest VT, including the following:

Rate greater than 120 beats per minute (usually 150-200)Wide QRS complexes (>140 ms; see the ECG below)Presence of atrioventricular (AV) dissociationFusion beatsCapture beatsThis patient is a 64-year-old man with a history oThis patient is a 64-year-old man with a history of prior myocardial infarction and syncope. In patients with prior myocardial infarction, the most common mechanism of wide QRS complex tachycardia is ventricular tachycardia. Myocardial scar tissue in ventricular tachycardia

The most common setting for VT is ischemic heart disease, in which myocardial scar tissue is the substrate for electrical reentry, but it can be seen in other conditions that create myocardial scar tissue, such as ion channel abnormalities, dilated cardiomyopathies, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, right ventricular dysplasia, Chagas disease,[5] and surgical incisions in the ventricle.

Ventricular tachycardia versus ventricular fibrillation

VT is distinguished from ventricular fibrillation (VF), which is a grossly disorganized, rapid ventricular rhythm that varies in interval and waveform. VF may be difficult to distinguish from rapid, polymorphic VT. There is a potential definitional overlap with accelerated idioventricular rhythm when an automatic VT is noted from 100-120 beats per minute.

Sudden death accounts for approximately half of all deaths from cardiovascular disease and is generally caused by VT and VF.

PreviousNextPathophysiology

Regardless of the arrhythmia mechanism in ventricular tachycardia (VT), the severity of clinical symptoms determines the urgency with which VT must be treated.

During VT, cardiac output is reduced due to the rapid heart rate and lack of a properly timed or coordinated atrial contraction. Ischemia and mitral[6] insufficiency may also contribute to hemodynamic intolerance. Hemodynamic collapse is more likely when underlying left ventricular dysfunction is present or with very rapid rates. Diminished cardiac output may result in diminished myocardial perfusion, worsening inotropic response and degeneration to VF, resulting in sudden death.

In patients with monomorphic VT, mortality risk correlates with the degree of structural heart disease. Underlying structural heart diseases, such as ischemic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Chagas disease, and right ventricular dysplasia, have all been associated with monomorphic or polymorphic VT degenerating to VF.[5]

Even without such degeneration, VT can also produce congestive heart failure and hemodynamic compromise, with subsequent morbidity and mortality.

If VT is hemodynamically tolerated, the incessant tachyarrhythmia may cause a dilated cardiomyopathy. This may develop over a period of weeks to months and resolves with successful management of the VT.[7] A similar course is occasionally seen with ventricular bigeminy, despite the absence of sustained high rates.

PreviousNextEtiology

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is usually a consequence of structural or ischemic heart disease, with breakdown of normal conduction patterns. Abnormal automaticity (which tends to favor ectopic foci) or activation of reentrant pathways in the myocardium can exist to generate the dysrhythmia. Electrolyte disturbances, ischemia, and sympathomimetics may increase the likelihood of VT in the susceptible myocardium.

Atrioventricular dissociation

AV dissociation, shown in the ECGs below, is apparent in approximately half of VT episodes, and when present, it is a hallmark characteristic of VT.[8] This occurs because the sinus node is depolarizing the atria at a rate that is slower than the pathologic, faster ventricular rate. P waves can be visualized at times in between or embedded in the QRS complexes, but the P waves and QRS complexes have their own independent rates.

This ECG shows another form of idiopathic ventricuThis ECG shows another form of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, seen in the absence of structural heart disease. This rhythm arises from the left ventricular septum and often responds to verapamil. Upon superficial examination, it appears to be a supraventricular tachycardia with bifascicular conduction block (RBBB/LAFB). Closer examination of lead V1 shows narrowing of the fourth QRS complex, consistent with fusion between the wide QRS complex and a conducted atrial beat, confirming AV dissociation and VT mechanism. AV dissociation. AV dissociation. Fusion and capture beats

Fusion beats and capture beats can occur in the presence of VT, depending on the refractory period of the AV node and the timing of ventricular and atrial depolarizations, respectively.

A fusion beat has a mixed morphology, due to normal AV node/His-Purkinje conduction occurring simultaneously with abnormal (a wide, complex QRS) ventricular depolarization. A normally conducted impulse travels from the AV node through the normal conduction pathway (a narrow QRS), and the competing impulse originates from the abnormal ectopic ventricular focus outside of the normal conduction pathway (a wide QRS). The two converge, leading to a mixed (fused) QRS.

A capture beat occurs when an atrial impulse arrives at the AV node at a "fortuitous" time, when the AV node has just recovered from its refractory period. The timing has to be just right, as the AV node is frequently in its refractory state due to depolarization caused by retrograde conduction from the rapid ventricular rhythm. When this occurs, conduction will proceed normally through the AV node/His-Purkinje system, "capturing" the ventricle and leading to a normal, narrow QRS complex. Fusion beats, capture beats, and AV dissociation are shown in the image below.

Fusion beats, capture beats, and AV dissociation. Fusion beats, capture beats, and AV dissociation.

Retrograde conduction can also exist from the ventricles to the atria via the AV node. This is not AV dissociation and reveals itself in an electrocardiogram (ECG) as a 1:1 correlation between the wide QRS complex and an inverted P wave, which follows the QRS complex.

Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

When the ventricular activation sequence is constant, the electrocardiographic pattern remains the same, and the rhythm is called monomorphic VT (seen in the ECG below).

Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.

Monomorphic VT is most commonly seen in patients with underlying structural heart disease. There is typically a zone of slow conduction, most commonly due to scarring and/or fibrillar disarray. Causes include prior infarct, any primary cardiomyopathy, surgical scar, hypertrophy, and muscle degeneration.

Reentrant tachycardias occur when an electrical wavefront travels slowly through the zone of slow conduction (usually damaged muscle protected by scar tissue), allowing the rest of the circuit time to repolarize. The wavefront breaks out of the scar, activates the ventricle, and reenters the slow conduction zone. The QRS morphology during VT can be used to predict the exit site from the zone of slow conduction.[9]

Although most patients with VT have underlying structural heart abnormalities, monomorphic VT is occasionally observed in patients with structurally normal hearts (idiopathic VT). These VTs are often exercise dependent, and their clinical behavior may be more consistent with triggered activity or abnormal automaticity.

Monomorphic VTs are typically named for their site of origin. The most commonly involved sites are the right ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular septum, and aortic root.[10]

Although monomorphic VTs have classically been considered benign, sudden death may occur, albeit rarely, despite the presence of a structurally normal heart.[11]

Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

When the QRS complex varies from beat to beat, the rhythm is described as polymorphic VT and suggests a variable electrical activation sequence. The most notorious, and probably the most common, form of polymorphic VT is torsade de pointes. The disorder’s name is a French term that suggests a "twisting of the points" of the QRS complexes over time

Torsade de pointes has unusual shifting-axis QRS complexes that appear (on ECGs) as if the heart is rotating upon an axis. It typically occurs during sinus rhythm and in the presence of drugs or conditions that prolong the QT interval (eg, type 1A antiarrhythmics, hypomagnesemia, droperidol). The dysrhythmia may occur either in the presence or in the absence of myocardial ischemia or infarction. Examples of torsade de pointes are shown below.

Torsade de pointes. This is a polymorphic ventricuTorsade de pointes. This is a polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with resting QT-interval prolongation. In this case, it was caused by the potassium channel blocker, sotalol. This rhythm is also observed in families with mutations affecting certain cardiac ion channels. Torsades de pointes. Torsades de pointes.

The term torsade de pointes is reserved for polymorphic VT observed in the setting of a prolonged QT interval. Other polymorphic VTs are occasionally observed during ischemia or myocarditis.

Acquired QT prolongation is observed with certain potassium channel–blocking medications. Most of the causative drugs block the delayed rectifier cardiac potassium current, IKr. These agents include quinidine, erythromycin, haloperidol, and many others.

Congenital long QT syndrome is a group of genetic disorders involving abnormal cardiac ion channels (most commonly potassium channels responsible for ventricular repolarization).

In acquired and congenital long QT syndromes, prolonged repolarization predisposes to torsade de pointes, which is most likely a reentrant rhythm with a constantly varying circuit. Other inherited ion channel abnormalities may cause idiopathic VF and familial polymorphic VT in the absence of QT prolongation.

Go to Torsade de Pointes for complete information on this topic.

Sustained and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia

The most common cause of sustained, monomorphic VT is a prior myocardial infarction (MI) with ventricular myocardial scar formation. The presence of myocardial fibrosis is a substrate for slow conduction pathways and associated reentry mechanisms.

Nonsustained VT and ectopy result from abnormal automaticity mechanisms and are more commonly associated with acute myocardial ischemia.

Idioventricular rhythm

A second variant of VT is accelerated idioventricular rhythm. Sometimes termed slow ventricular tachycardia, this dysrhythmia presents with a rate of 60-100 beats per minute. It typically occurs with underlying heart disease (ischemic or structural), is transient, and only rarely is associated with hemodynamic compromise or collapse. Treatment of the dysrhythmia itself usually is not required unless significant hemodynamic impairment develops.

Inherited dysrhythmia

Due to advances in molecular biology, a number of inherited dysrhythmic disorders with a propensity toward VT have been described. Brugada syndrome, congenital long and short QT syndromes, and catecholaminergic polymorphic VT have autosomal dominant inheritance patterns.[12, 13, 14, 15] Mechanistically, each disorder is characterized by imbalanced ion transport across the cardiac cellular membrane, which leads to abnormalities in cardiac repolarization and, consequently, increased risk of dysrhythmia. An autosomal recessive form of long QT syndrome is associated with increased arrhythmia risk and congenital hearing loss.

These syndromes have all been linked to sudden cardiac death. Patients with these disorders are managed with a combination of genetic typing, antidysrhythmic medications, lifestyle modification, and, in selected cases, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement.[16]

Supraventricular tachycardia

Wide complex conduction during supraventricular tachycardia can mimic VT. The 2 most common forms of are (1) AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and (2) AV nodal reentrant tachycardia with aberrant conduction (AVNRT).

AVRT can be either orthodromic or antidromic depending on the direction of conduction through the AV node. All antidromic AVRTs cause wide-complex tachycardia due to ventricular activation outside of the His-Purkinje system, and some orthodromic AVRTs conduct with wide QRS complexes as a result of functional or preexisting bundle-branch block or intraventricular conduction delay. Note the images below.

Retrograde P's #1 Retrograde P's #1 Retrograde P's #2. Retrograde P's #2.

Aberrantly conducted SVT circuits can mimic VT, but careful ECG analysis can allow discrimination of VT from aberrant SVT in most cases. See Electrocardiography for details.

Risk factors for ventricular tachycardia

Triggers of VT include electrolyte abnormalities, ischemia, inflammation, and sleep apnea.

Hypokalemia is the most important arrhythmia trigger clinically, followed by hypomagnesemia. Hyperkalemia may also predispose to VT and VF, particularly in patients with structural heart disease.

Certain genetic groups carry genetically mediated risk of unusual heart disease. Examples include the Veneto region of Italy and Greek island of Naxos (right ventricular dysplasia),[17] and northeastern Thailand (idiopathic ventricular fibrillation/Brugada syndrome).[18]

Ventricular tachycardia risk within populations generally varies with the risk factors for atherosclerosis, rather than ethnic differences per se.

Among patients younger than 35 years, the most common causes of sudden death, and presumably of VT, include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, right ventricular cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and long QT syndrome.

Risk factors for VT also include the following:

Use of sympathomimetic agents - From intravenous inotropes to illicit agents such as methamphetamine or, as previously mentioned, cocaine Drugs that prolong the QT complex (eg, type 1A antidysrhythmics, droperidol and related phenothiazines) - May infrequently cause torsade de pointes Systemic diseases that affect the myocardium, such as sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, hemochromatosis, and rheumatoid arthritis Structural congenital disorders such as right ventricular dysplasia and tetralogy of FallotDigitalis toxicity - Can lead to biventricular tachycardiaInherited channelopathies[4]

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association / European Society of Cardiology (ACC/AHA/ESC) 2006 guidelines (the most current version available as of May 18, 2011) for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death recommend an antidigitalis antibody for patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias, advanced AV block, and/or asystole caused by digitalis toxicity.[3]

PreviousNextEpidemiologyIncidence and mortality rate in the United States

The incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the United States is not well quantified because of the clinical overlap of VT with ventricular fibrillation (VF).

Examination of sudden death data provides a rough estimate of VT incidence. Most sudden cardiac deaths are caused by VT or VF, at an estimated rate of approximately 300,000 deaths per year in the United States, or about half of the estimated cardiac mortality in this country.

A prospective surveillance study gave a sudden death incidence of 53 per 100,000, accounting for 5.6% of all mortality.[19] This is only a rough estimate of VT incidence, because many patients have nonfatal VT and because arrhythmic sudden deaths may be associated with VF or bradycardia rather than with VT.

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and nonsustained VT, sudden death mortality rates approach 30% in 2 years.

International incidence of ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia and coronary artery disease are common throughout most of the developed world. In developing countries, ventricular tachycardia and other heart diseases are relatively less common.

Sex predilection

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is observed more frequently in men, because ischemic heart disease is more prevalent among men. Among patients with coronary artery disease in the Framingham Heart Study, male deaths were more common than female deaths (46% vs 34%, respectively).[20]

Females with acquired or congenital long QT syndromes are at greater risk for sudden death. The opposite is true for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (a 2-fold male predominance) and Brugada syndrome (an approximately 8-fold male predominance).

As coronary artery disease (CAD) becomes more common in women, it seems certain that the incidence of VT in women will increase.

Age predilection

The incidence of ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) increases with age, regardless of sex, as the prevalence of coronary artery disease increases.

VT is unusual among pediatric patients, although when present, it occurs in the postoperative cardiac setting or in patients with associated congenital heart disease. Tachydysrhythmias in this population generally are paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PSVTs).

Ventricular tachycardia incidence rates peak in the middle decades of life, following the incidence of structural heart disease.

Idiopathic VT can be observed at any age.

Go to Pediatric Ventricular Tachycardia for complete information on this topic.

Morbidity and mortality in ventricular tachycardia

Morbidity and mortality in VT arise principally from spontaneous degeneration into the more malignant VF. (See Pathophysiology, above.) In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and nonsustained VT, sudden death mortality rates approach 30% in 2 years.

If VT is associated with hemodynamic collapse, morbidity in resuscitated survivors can include ischemic encephalopathy, acute renal insufficiency, transient ventricular dysfunction, aspiration pneumonitis, and trauma related to resuscitative efforts.

PreviousNextPrognosis

Prognosis in ventricular tachycardia (VT) varies with the specific cardiac process but is predicted best by left ventricular function.

As previously mentioned, in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and nonsustained VT, sudden-death mortality rates approach 30% in 2 years.

In patients with idiopathic VT, the prognosis is excellent, and the major risk is due to poorly timed syncopal spells.

A few exceptions exist to the left-ventricle rule. Patients with long QT syndrome, right ventricular dysplasia, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be at increased risk of sudden death despite relatively preserved left ventricular function. These possibilities should be considered in any patient with a strong family history of premature sudden death.

PreviousNextPatient Education

For patient education information, see the Heart Center, as well as Heart Rhythm Disorders, Supraventricular Tachycardia, and Palpitations.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Ventricular Tachycardia

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Overview

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but lethal complication of myocardial infarction (MI). The event occurs 2-8 days after an infarction and often precipitates cardiogenic shock.[1] The differential diagnosis of postinfarction cardiogenic shock should exclude free ventricular wall rupture and rupture of the papillary muscles. See the image below.

Photograph of heart sectioned transversely at levePhotograph of heart sectioned transversely at level of middle left ventricle showing posterior ventricular septal defect at site of recent acute myocardial infarction.

To avoid the high morbidity and mortality associated with this disorder, patients should undergo emergency surgical treatment.[2, 3, 4, 5] In current practice, postinfarction VSR is recognized as a surgical emergency, and the presence of cardiogenic shock is an indication for intervention.[6] Long-term survival can be achieved in patients who undergo prompt surgery. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be required. The addition of CABG has helped improve long-term survival.

Surgery is performed via a transinfarction approach, and all reconstruction is performed with prosthetic materials to avoid tension. Developments in myocardial protection and improved prosthetic materials have contributed greatly to successful management of VSR.[7] Improved surgical techniques (eg, infarctectomy) and better perioperative mechanical and pharmacologic support have helped lower mortality. In addition, the development of surgical techniques to repair perforations in different areas of the septum has led to improved results.

In current practice, patients undergoing shunt repair tend to be older and are more likely to have received thrombolytic agents, which may complicate repair. After successful repair, survival and quality of life are excellent, even in patients older than 70 years.[8]

For information, news, and CME activities on heart failure, see the Heart Failure Resource Center. For patient education resources, see the Heart Center, as well as Ventricular Septal Defect and Heart Attack.

NextPathophysiology

The septal blood supply originates from branches of the left anterior descending coronary artery, the posterior descending branch of the right coronary artery, or the circumflex artery when it is dominant. Infarction associated with a ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is usually transmural and extensive. About 60% of VSRs occur with infarction of the anterior wall; 40% occur with infarction of the posterior or inferior wall. Posterior VSR may be accompanied by mitral valve insufficiency secondary to papillary muscle infarction or dysfunction.

At autopsy, patients with VSR usually show complete coronary artery occlusion with little or no collateral flow. The lack of collateral flow may be secondary to associated arterial disease, anatomic anomalies, or myocardial edema. Sometimes, multiple septal perforations occur. These may occur simultaneously or within several days of each other.

Ventricular aneurysms are commonly associated with postinfarction VSR and contribute significantly to the hemodynamic compromise in these patients. The reported incidence of ventricular aneurysms ranges from 35% to 68%, whereas the incidence of ventricular aneurysms alone after myocardial infarction (MI) without VSR is considerably lower (12.4%).

The natural history of postinfarction VSR is greatly influenced by hypertension, anticoagulation therapy, advanced age, and, possibly, thrombolytic therapy. The natural course in patients with postinfarction VSR is well documented and short. Most patients die within the first week, and almost 90% die within the first year; some reports indicate that fewer than 7% of patients are alive after 1 year.

This grim prognosis results from an acute volume overload exacted on both ventricles in a heart already compromised by a large MI and occasionally by extensive coronary artery disease (CAD) in sites other than that already infarcted. In addition, superimposed ischemic mitral valve regurgitation, a ventricular aneurysm, or a combination of these conditions may be present, further compromising heart function. The depressed left ventricular function commonly leads to impaired peripheral organ perfusion and death in most patients.

A few sporadic reports indicate that some patients with medically treated postinfarction VSR live for several years. Although many medical advances have been made in the nonsurgical treatment of these patients, including intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABCP), these methods have not eliminated the need for surgery.

PreviousNextEpidemiology

Rupture of the interventricular septum is an uncommon complication of myocardial infarction (MI). Although autopsy studies reveal an 11% incidence of myocardial free-wall rupture after MI, septal wall perforation is much less common, occurring at a rate of approximately 1-2%.

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) occurs in a zone of necrotic myocardial tissue, usually within the first 10-14 days. Clinical studies report an average time of 2.6 days from MI to VSR. However, some data suggest that initial treatment of MI with thrombolytics may affect both the time between infarction and VSR and the eventual outcome. Early use of thrombolytic agents may lead to reopening of the occluded vessels, thereby reducing the incidence of VSR.

The age range of patients who sustain a postinfarction VSR is wide, from 44-81 years. Men are affected more commonly than women, though VSR is more common in women than would be predicted on the basis of the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) alone.

PreviousNextPrognosis

Operative mortality is directly related to the interval between myocardial infarction (MI) and surgical repair. If repair is performed 3 weeks or more after an infarction, mortality is approximately 20%; if it is performed before this time, mortality approaches 50%. The most obvious reason for this is that the greater the degree of myocardial damage and hemodynamic compromise, the more urgent the need for early intervention.

With the use of an early operative approach, most studies show an overall of less than 25%. Mortality tends to be lower for patients with anteriorly located ventricular septal ruptures (VSRs) and lowest for patients with apical VSRs. For anterior defects, mortality ranges from 10% to 15%; for posterior defects, mortality ranges from 30% to 35%.

More than 50% of deaths occurring after surgery for postinfarction VSR are due to cardiac failure. Sudden death is rare, and intractable heart failure can also occur. Other causes of death include cerebral embolism. Most patients who survive the hospital period have good functional status, with the majority falling into New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II.[9]

The most important risk factors for death in the early phase are poor hemodynamics and associated right ventricular dysfunction developing before the patient comes to the operating room. The amount and distribution of myocardial necrosis and scarring are responsible for both.

Right ventricular dysfunction results from ischemic damage or frank infarction of the right ventricle and is present when stenosis occurs in the right coronary artery system. The higher mortality observed after repair of defects located inferiorly in the septum is probably related to the higher prevalence of important right coronary artery stenosis.

The severity and distribution of coronary artery disease (CAD) are also risk factors. Similarly, advanced age at operation, diabetes, and preinfarction hypertension are risk factors for death in the early phase.

Risk factors for death in patients with postinfarction VSR may be summarized as follows:

Posteriorly located septal ruptures are technically more difficult to repair and are associated with profound right ventricular dysfunction The presence of multiple organ failure is a poor prognostic factorThe presence of cardiogenic shock does not bode well for the patient’s survivalA shortened interval between infarction and surgery usually indicates that the patient is considered more ill and therefore is at greater risk for death PreviousNextClinical Presentation

Upon auscultation, a loud systolic murmur is heard, usually within the first week after an acute myocardial infarction (MI). This is the most consistent physical finding of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR). Before the development of the murmur, the patient may have been stable after the acute MI. Coincident with the onset of the murmur, the patient’s clinical course undergoes a sudden deterioration, with the development of congestive heart failure (CHF) and, often, cardiogenic shock.

The typical harsh systolic murmur is audible over a large area, including the left sternal border and apical area. It sometimes radiates to the left axilla, thereby mimicking mitral regurgitation (MR). A thrill is palpable in approximately 50% of patients.

Almost 50% of patients have recurrent chest pain. The differential diagnosis includes VSR and mitral insufficiency secondary to papillary muscle rupture, papillary muscle dysfunction, or left ventricular dilatation.

Clinical features of VSR may be summarized as follows:

The rupture typically occurs 3-8 days after an MIVSR is more likely to occur in the anterior septum than in the posterior septum (60% vs 40%)The most consistent finding is a murmurIn the differential diagnosis, exclude mitral regurgitation from papillary muscle ruptureDiagnosis is confirmed with the aid of echocardiography and the presence of a left-to-right shuntCatheterization results help determine the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD)Of patients treated without surgery, 90% dieSurgical treatment must be carried out on an emergency basis, even if the patient is stable[3] All VSRs are closed with a patch and associated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)Operative mortality is 10-15% for anterior defects and 30-35% for posterior defectsPreviousNextWorkupImaging studies

On plain chest radiographs, 82% of patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) demonstrate left ventricular enlargement, 78% have pulmonary edema, and 64% have a pleural effusion. These findings are nonspecific and do not exclude other causes, such as a ruptured papillary muscle.

M-mode transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) have been used to help diagnose postinfarction VSR. TTE findings have been improved with the use of color-flow Doppler methods to visualize the VSR. In addition, echocardiography can help assess the presence of any mitral valve pathology.

Electrocardiography

No electrocardiographic (ECG) features are diagnostic of postinfarction VSR, though ECG indeed provides some useful information. Persistent ST-segment elevation associated with ventricular aneurysm is common. ECG may reveal atrioventricular block in one third of patients. ECG can also be used to help predict the anatomic location of the septal rupture.

Catheterization and pressure measurement

Left-heart catheterization with coronary angiography is recommended in all stable patients. This procedure is time-consuming and carries some degree of morbidity in already-compromised patients; accordingly, good judgment is required when this test is ordered.

An important diagnostic test for differentiating VSR from mitral valve insufficiency is catheterization of the right heart with a Swan-Ganz catheter. In the presence of a VSR, oxygen concentration between the right atrium and the pulmonary artery is stepped up. In addition, a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure tracing is beneficial for differentiating acute mitral regurgitation (MR) from VSR.

Left- and right-side pressure measurements help estimate the degree of biventricular failure and are useful in monitoring the response to perioperative therapy. Whereas right-side failure is more common in patients with postinfarction VSR, left-side failure and refractory pulmonary edema are more prominent in patients with a ruptured papillary muscle. However, one third of patients with postinfarction VSR also have some degree of MR secondary to left ventricular dysfunction. Only rarely is VSR also associated with ruptured papillary muscle.

PreviousNextTreatment & ManagementMedical therapy

Initiate pharmacologic therapy in an attempt to render the patient hemodynamically stable. The goals are to reduce afterload on the heart and to increase forward cardiac output.

Vasodilators may be used in an attempt to decrease the left-to-right shunt associated with the mechanical defect and thereby increase cardiac output. Intravenous (IV) nitroglycerin can be used as a vasodilator and may provide improved myocardial blood flow in patients with significant ischemic cardiac disease.

When used alone, inotropic agents may increase cardiac output; however, without changes in the ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow (Qp-to-Qs ratio), they markedly increase left ventricular work and myocardial oxygen consumption. The profound level of cardiogenic shock in some patients precludes vasodilator treatment, often necessitating vasopressor support.

Vasopressors markedly increase left ventricular work and myocardial oxygen consumption. They also increase systemic afterload and further increase the Qp-to-Qs ratio, thus lowering cardiac output and greatly augmenting myocardial oxygen consumption.

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABCP) offers the most important means of temporary hemodynamic support. IABCP reduces left ventricular afterload, thus increasing systemic cardiac output and decreasing the Qp-to-Qs ratio. IABCP also facilitates diastolic augmentation with an increase in coronary blood flow, resulting in an improved oxygen supply.

IABCP is not a substitute for urgent intervention, and in patients with cardiogenic shock, it should be followed by immediate intervention. Patients with ventricular septal rupture (VSR) do not die of cardiac failure; they die as a result of end-organ failure. Only by shortening the duration of shock can the high risk of mortality be prevented.

Achieving hemodynamic stability before surgery is very beneficial, but prolonged attempts to improve the patient’s hemodynamic status can be hazardous.[10]

This aggressive approach often results in temporary stability of these extremely ill patients. As a rule, however, these benefits are brief, and patients may deteriorate rapidly. Therefore, early diagnosis and rapid surgical intervention should be planned. Only about 10-15% of patients can be treated with conservative measures for a period of 2-4 weeks, after which surgical treatment can be provided at a greatly reduced risk.

Operative therapy

Indications and contraindications

In view of the grim prognosis for medically treated patients, the diagnosis of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR), by itself, constitutes an indication for operation. The controversy that once surrounded the timing of surgical intervention is no longer an issue, and most surgeons now agree that early surgery is indicated to minimize the risk of mortality and morbidity. The success of surgical therapy depends on prompt medical stabilization of the patient and prevention of cardiogenic shock.

The relative safety of repair 2-3 weeks or more after perforation has been established. Because the edges of the defect have become firmer and fibrotic, repair is more secure and is easily accomplished. A successful clinical outcome is related to the adequacy of the closure of the VSR; therefore, if possible, search for multiple defects both preoperatively and at the time of surgery.

Only when the patient is hemodynamically stable should repair be initially delayed, but there must be a high degree of certainty that the patient is in fact stable. These patients can suddenly deteriorate and die. The criteria for a delay in surgical treatment include the following:

Adequate cardiac outputNo evidence of cardiogenic shockAbsence of signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF) or minimal use of pressor agents to control initial symptomsAbsence of fluid retentionGood renal function

The natural history of the disease is such that few patients present with these signs and symptoms. In most patients, postinfarction VSR rapidly leads to a worsening of the hemodynamic state, with cardiogenic shock, marked and intractable symptoms of CHF, and fluid retention. Immediate surgery is usually indicated.[6] The high surgical risk of early repair is accepted because of the even higher risk of death without surgery under such circumstances.

Occasionally, a delay in diagnosis and referral occurs. These patients are usually critically ill, and the prognosis is very grim; thus, allowing the natural history of the disease to take its course is prudent.[6]

Although most patients who experience postinfarction VSR need emergency surgery, an occasional patient, because a delay in either diagnosis or referral, may be in a state of multiorgan failure and may not be a candidate for surgery. The chances of such a patient surviving an operation are minimal; in these circumstances, supportive medical therapy may be adequate.[6] Patients who are comatose and in cardiogenic shock have a particularly poor prognosis after surgery, and surgery is best avoided in such circumstances.

Choice of operative approach

The first operations for repair of postinfarction VSR used an approach through the right ventricle, with an incision of the right ventricular outflow tract such as was used to repair some congenital ventriculoseptal defects (VSDs). This approach proved inadequate because of limited exposure for lesions at the apex of the heart, injury to normal right ventricular muscle, interruption of coronary collateral vessels, and failure to excise the infarcted tissue.

Subsequently, a transinfarction approach was described, which incorporated infarctectomy, aneurysmectomy, and repair of the ventricular septal perforation. Several techniques have been used to close these defects. The choice of procedure is determined by the location of the defect.

Most defects are anteroapical and are closed by buttressing the defect with viable muscle from the adjacent anterior left ventricular wall. Smaller defects located high in the ventricular septum are closed with a Dacron patch.

High posterior septal or inferior defects, which are less common, are approached through the inferior portion of the heart, usually in the distribution of the posterior descending coronary branch of the right coronary artery. The incision is made in the area of maximal infarction, which is usually on the right ventricular side of the septum. A well-proven principle of repair for these defects is the use of a synthetic patch closure to prevent tension.

Additional procedures that may be considered in the treatment of postinfarction VSR include the following:

Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)Mitral valve replacementExcision of left ventricular aneurysm

Controversy surrounds the issue of whether to perform CABG in patients undergoing emergency postinfarction ventricular septal repair. Some authors have found no benefit to CABG in this setting and have concluded that cardiac catheterization in ill patients is time-consuming and poses a risk of contrast injury to the kidney. Others, however, have used a selective approach to cardiac catheterization.

In patients who probably do not have a history of angina or previous myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac catheterization is deferred. Cardiac catheterization findings help confirm and quantitate the presence of a shunt and reveal pulmonary artery pressure and resistance values. The left ventriculogram helps determine the location and number of VSDs, define left ventricular function, and assess mitral valve function. Most surgeons perform bypass in patients with VSR, with significant improvements in survival.

Occasionally, significant mitral regurgitation (MR) may be associated with acute VSR, particularly when the infarction is posterior. In such circumstances, the mitral valve must be replaced. Replacement is usually best accomplished through the left ventriculotomy incision by using interrupted, pledged mattress sutures.

When a left ventricular aneurysm is associated with postinfarction VSR, it is excised as the initial step in surgical therapy. After repair of the VSR, the aneurysm is generally repaired.

Perioperative management

Preoperative management is directed toward rapid resuscitation and stabilization of the patient and preparation for surgery. The goals are as follows:

To reduce systemic vascular resistance (thereby decreasing the left-to-right shunt)To maintain a stable cardiac output and blood pressureTo maintain coronary artery blood flow

Preoperative treatment of patients with postinfarction VSR may be summarized as follows:

Transfer patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) for resuscitationPlace a Swan-Ganz catheter to assist with hemodynamic managementDecrease the systemic vascular resistance and the left-to-right shunt with vasodilatorsMaintain cardiac output and organ perfusion with inotropic agentsMaintain coronary artery blood flowUse IABCP to decrease myocardial oxygen consumption, decrease afterload, and increase coronary artery perfusionUse mechanical ventilation as requiredUse echocardiography to help determine the site of septal ruptureUse cardiac catheterization to help determine the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD)

Principles associated with the evolution of techniques for the closure of postinfarction VSR may be summarized as follows:

Determine and understand the anatomy and location of the VSR and any associated coronary artery pathologyExpeditiously establish hypothermic total cardiopulmonary bypass, and pay attention to myocardial protection with cardioplegiaUse a transinfarction approach to the VSR, with the site of ventriculotomy determined by the location of the transmural infarctionInspect the papillary muscles, and concomitantly replace the mitral valve only if frank papillary muscle rupture is presentTrim the left ventricular margins back to viable muscleConservatively trim the right ventricular muscleClose the VSR without tension, using prosthetic materialButtress the suture line with Teflon pledgets.

Percutaneous techniques have been used successfully to close some congenital VSDs. Technical improvements in experimental devices for closing intracardiac shunts are being made to treat postinfarction VSR or residual shunts after primary repair. A balloon catheter introduced percutaneously has been used to abolish the shunt in poor-risk patients.

Patients who require an intra-aortic balloon pump preoperatively appear to benefit from postoperative support with the device for 24-72 hours. Some of these patients demonstrate a small persistent or recurrent left-to-right shunt. Because of the large amount of prosthetic material used to repair the septal perforation, anticoagulation therapy in these patients is recommended by some surgeons for a period of 6-8 weeks.

Residual VSDs have been noted early or late after operative treatment in 10-25% of patients. These residual defects are easily diagnosed with the aid of color-flow Doppler investigations. Residual VSDs may be attributable to the reopening of a closed defect, the presence of an overlooked VSD, or the development of a new septal perforation during the early postoperative period.

Reoperation is required for closure of such residual VSDs when the Qp-to-Qs ratio is greater than 2. When the VSDs are small and asymptomatic, a conservative approach may be recommended because spontaneous closure can occur.

Percutaneous treatment

Data collected by the Society of the Thoracic Surgeons National Database indicates that post infarct VSD is a lethal disorder, even with treatment. The hope is that some type of percutaneous interventional technique may be developed in future to close the ruptured VSD and lower the mortality. Isolated reports with the amplatzer septal occluder do reveal that the technique is safe for closure of small lesions.[11, 12]

Previous, Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Background

Right ventricular infarction was first recognized in a subgroup of patients with inferior wall myocardial infarctions who demonstrated right ventricular failure and elevated right ventricular filling pressures despite relatively normal left ventricular filling pressures. Increasing recognition of right ventricular infarction, either in association with left ventricular infarction or as an isolated event, emphasizes the clinical significance of the right ventricle to total cardiac function.

Interest in recognizing right ventricular infarction noninvasively has grown because of the therapeutic implications of distinguishing patients with right ventricular dysfunction from those with the more usual clinical presentation of left ventricular dysfunction. Patients with right ventricular infarctions associated with inferior infarctions have much higher rates of significant hypotension, bradycardia requiring pacing support, and in-hospital mortality than isolated inferior infarctions.[1]

For more information, see Myocardial Infarction.

NextPathophysiology

The right ventricle is a thin-walled chamber that functions at low oxygen demands and pressure. It is perfused throughout the cardiac cycle in both systole and diastole, and its ability to extract oxygen is increased during hemodynamic stress. All of these factors make the right ventricle less susceptible to infarction than the left ventricle.

The posterior descending branch of the right coronary artery usually supplies the inferior and posterior walls of the right ventricle. The marginal branches of the right coronary artery supply the lateral wall of the right ventricle. The anterior wall of the right ventricle has a dual blood supply: the conus branch of the right coronary artery and the moderator branch artery, which courses from the left anterior descending artery.[2]

Interestingly, right ventricular infarction noted at necropsy usually involves the posterior septum and posterior wall rather than the right free wall. The relative sparing of the right ventricular anterior wall apparently arises from a high degree of collateralization. This collateral blood flow is thought to be derived from the thebesian veins and diffusion of oxygen directly from the ventricular cavity. A direct correlation exists between the anatomic site of right coronary artery occlusion and the extent of right ventricular infarction. Studies have demonstrated that more proximal right coronary artery occlusions result in larger right ventricular infarctions.[3] On occasion, the right ventricle can be subjected to infarction from occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery.[4]

Because the right ventricle is considered a low-pressure volume pump, its contractility is highly dependent on diastolic pressure. Hence, when contractility and associated diastolic dysfunction are impaired attendant to right ventricular infarction, the right ventricular diastolic pressure increases substantially and systolic pressure decreases. In such a scenario, concomitant left ventricular dysfunction, with increase in right ventricular afterload, is possible. In such a setting, right ventricular output can decrease dramatically, and the only driving force remaining is elevated right atrial pressure. In such a circumstance, the right ventricle serves as a poorly functioning conduit between the right atrium and the pulmonary artery.

Elevation of right atrial pressure secondary to right ventricular infarction has been noted to serve as a stimulus for secretion of atrial natriuretic factor. Increased levels of this polypeptide can be detrimental to normal left ventricular filling pressures. This occurs by virtue of the potent vasodilating, natriuretic, diuretic, and aldosterone-inhibiting properties of atrial natriuretic factor. Inappropriately elevated levels of atrial natriuretic factor may worsen the clinical syndrome of right ventricular infarction.[5] The potential hemodynamic derangements associated with right ventricular infarction render the afflicted patient unusually sensitive to diminished preload (ie, volume) and loss of atrioventricular synchrony. These 2 circumstances can result in a severe decrease in right and, secondarily, left, ventricular output.[6, 7, 8]

Early thrombolysis or mechanical reperfusion of an occluded coronary artery resulting in right ventricular infarction is associated with prompt reduction in right atrial pressure. This is extremely important because persistently elevated right atrial pressure has been associated with increased in-hospital mortality when associated with myocardial infarction. The extent of right ventricular infarction varies greatly and is dependent on the site of occlusion of the right ventricular arterial supply. If occlusion occurs before the right ventricular marginal branches and if collateral blood flow from the left anterior descending coronary artery is absent, then the size of infarction generally is greater. Extent of infarction depends somewhat on flow through the thebesian veins.[9, 10] In general, any major reduction in blood supply to the right ventricular free wall portends an adverse prognosis in association with this disorder.

PreviousNextEpidemiology

Isolated infarction of the right ventricle is extremely rare; right ventricular infarction usually is noted in association with inferior wall myocardial infarction. The incidence of right ventricular infarction in such cases ranges from 10-50%, depending on the series.[11]

The frequency of right ventricular infarction, which can be detected by right-sided precordial leads, in association with non–ST-segment elevation or non–Q-wave myocardial infarction, is not known and currently is being investigated. Although right ventricular infarction is clinically evident in a sizable number of cases, the incidence is considerably less than that found at autopsy.[12, 13, 10, 14] A major reason for the discrepancy is the difficulty in establishing the presence of right ventricular infarction in living subjects. Additionally, right ventricular dysfunction and stunning frequently are of a transient nature, such that estimation of its true incidence is even more difficult.

Criteria have been set forth to diagnose right ventricular infarction; even when strictly employed, however, the criteria lead to underestimation of the true incidence of right ventricular infarction.[15, 16, 17]

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Right Ventricular Infarction

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Background

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is the most commonly identified arrhythmia in cardiac arrest patients. This arrhythmia is a severe derangement of the heartbeat that usually ends in death within minutes unless corrective measures are promptly taken. The number of survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has increased with expansion of community-based emergency rescue systems, widespread use of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs), and increasing numbers of lay persons trained in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

NextPathophysiology

VF occurs in a variety of clinical situations but is most often associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) and as a terminal event. VF may be due to acute myocardial infarction or ischemia, or it may occur in the setting of chronic infarct scar. Intracellular calcium accumulation, the action of free radicals, metabolic alterations, and autonomic modulation are some important influences on the development of VF during ischemia. Thrombolytic agents reduce the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction (MI).

Cardiovascular events, including sudden cardiac death (SCD) from VF (but not asystole), most frequently occur in the morning and may be related to increased platelet aggregability. (Aspirin reduces the frequency of this form of mortality.) A spike in the number of SCDs appears to occur during the winter months.

VF can occur during any of the following conditions or situations: Antiarrhythmic drug administrationHypoxiaIschemiaAtrial fibrillationVery rapid ventricular rates in the preexcitation syndromeElectrical shock administered during cardioversionElectrical shock caused by accidental contact with improperly grounded equipmentCompetitive ventricular pacing to terminate VTMost prehospitalized patients with cardiac arrest (65-85%) have VF identified as the initial rhythm by emergency rescue personnel. Approximately 20-30% of patients from all documented sudden death events have bradyarrhythmia or asystole at the time of initial contact, indicating a terminal event from massive myocyte necrosis, pump failure, or VF progression to asystole. Only 7-10% have sustained VT as the initial rhythm on contact, and VT is associated with the best overall prognosis. When documentation is available, it often shows that rapid VT precedes VF. In patients with ischemic heart disease, the most common form of VT is monomorphic, which arises from a reentrant focus. In patients who survive an MI, it has been demonstrated that those with frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), particularly complex forms such as multiform PVCs, short coupling intervals (R-on-T phenomenon), or VT (salvos of 3 or more ectopic beats), are at increased risk of sudden death. Even though many patients have anatomic and functional cardiac substrates that predispose them to develop ventricular arrhythmias, only a small percentage develop VF. The interplay among the regional ischemia, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and transient inciting events (eg, worsened ischemia, acidosis, hypoxemia, wall tension, drugs, metabolic disturbances) has been proposed to be the precipitator of VF. PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequencyUnited States

SCD accounts for approximately 300,000 deaths per year in the United States, of which 75-80% are due to VF. More deaths are attributable to VF than to lung cancer, breast cancer, or AIDS. This represents an incidence of 0.08-0.16% per year in the adult population. VF is commonly the first expression of CAD and is responsible for approximately 50% of deaths from CAD, often within the first hour after the onset of an acute MI or coronary syndrome.

In several population-based studies, the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has been noted as declining in the past 2 decades, but the proportion of sudden CAD deaths in the United States due to VF has not changed. A high incidence of VF occurs among certain population subgroups (eg, patients with congestive heart failure [CHF] with ejection fraction

The time dependence of risk for VF has been noted in several studies, with an increased number of events in the first 6-24 months after surviving a major cardiovascular event. Recurrence of VF in survivors of cardiac arrest can be up to 30% in the first year.

International

The frequency of VF in industrialized Western nations is similar to that in the United States. The incidence of VF in other countries varies as a reflection of CAD prevalence in those populations. The trend toward increasing frequency of VF events in developing nations is thought to reflect a change in dietary and lifestyle habits.

Mortality/Morbidity

A witness is not present in up to 40% of the approximately 225,000 deaths attributed to VF in the United States each year. For most people who experience VF, survival depends on the presence of individuals who are competent in performing basic life support, rapid availability or arrival of personnel and apparatus for defibrillation and advanced life support, and transfer to a hospital.

Even under ideal circumstances, only an estimated 20% of patients who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survive to hospital discharge. In a study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival in New York City, only 1.4% of patients survived to hospital discharge.[1] Other studies in suburban and rural areas have indicated survival rates up to 35%.[2] Placement of AEDs throughout communities and training people to use them has the potential to markedly improve outcomes from SCD. One study suggests routine coronary angiography with potentially associated percutaneous coronary intervention may favorably alter the prognosis of resuscitated patients with stable hemodynamics who are submitted to mild therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.[3]

Upon presentation to an emergency department (ED), the most important determinants of survival include (1) an unsupported systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 90 mm Hg, (2) a time from loss of consciousness to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of less than 25 minutes, and (3) some degree of neurological responsiveness.

A major adverse outcome from a VF event is anoxic encephalopathy, which occurs in 30-80% of patients.

A study conducted in Minnesota on all adult patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) VF from 1990-2008 found that long-term survivors of OHCA VF have long-term memory deficits compared with the normal population at the same age and education level. These findings provide a baseline for cognitive outcomes studies as new techniques are developed to improve survival.[4]

Race

Most data are inconclusive regarding racial differences and the incidence of VF. Some studies suggest that a greater proportion of coronary deaths were sudden in blacks compared with whites. In a report by Gillum on SCD from 1980-1985, the percentage of CAD deaths occurring out of the hospital and in EDs was found to be higher in blacks than in whites.[5]

Sex

Men have a higher incidence of VF than women (3:1). This ratio generally reflects the higher incidence of CAD in men. Recent evidence suggests that a major sex difference may exist in the mechanism of MI. Basic and observational data point to the fact that men tend to have coronary plaque rupture, whereas women tend to have plaque erosion. Whether this biologic difference accounts for the male predominance of VF is unclear.

Age

The incidence of VF parallels the incidence of CAD, with the peak of VF occurring in people aged 45-75 years. The incidence of VF increases with age in men and women of all races because the prevalence of CAD increases with age. However, the proportion of sudden deaths from CAD decreases with age. In the Framingham Heart Study, the proportion of sudden CAD deaths was 62% in men aged 45-54 years, but this percentage fell to 58% in men aged 55-64 years and to 42% in men aged 65-74 years.[6] According to Kuller, 31% of deaths are sudden in people aged 20-29 years.[7]

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Ventricular Fibrillation