Showing posts with label Heart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heart. Show all posts

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Background

Heart transplantation is the procedure by which the failing heart is replaced with another heart from a suitable donor.[1] It is generally reserved for patients with end-stage congestive heart failure (CHF) who are estimated to have less than 1 year to live without the transplant and who are not candidates for or have not been helped by conventional medical therapy. In addition, most candidates are excluded from other surgical options because of the poor condition of the heart.

Candidacy determination and evaluation are key components of the process, as are postoperative follow-up care and immunosuppression management. Proper execution of these steps can culminate in an extremely satisfying outcome for both the physician and patient.[2]

Candidates for cardiac transplantation generally present with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III (moderate) symptoms or class IV (severe) symptoms.[3] Evaluation demonstrates ejection fractions of less than 25%. Attempts are made to stabilize the cardiac condition while the evaluation process is undertaken.

Interim therapy can include oral agents as well as inotropic support. Mechanical support with the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or implantable assist devices may be appropriate in some patients as a bridge to transplantation.[4, 5, 6] However, mechanical support does not improve waiting list survival in adult patients with congenital heart disease.[7]

The annual frequency of heart transplantation is about 1% of the general population with heart failure, both candidates and noncandidates. Improved medical management of CHF has decreased the candidate population; however, organ availability remains an issue.[8, 9] Further information on organ availability and waiting lists is available from the United Network for Organ Sharing.

For patient education resources, see the Heart Center, as well as Heart and Lung Transplant and Congestive Heart Failure.

NextDisease Processes Necessitating Heart Transplantation

The disease processes that necessitate cardiac transplantation can be divided into the following categories:

Dilated cardiomyopathy (54%) - This often has an unclear originIschemic cardiomyopathy (45%) - This percentage is rising because of the increase in coronary artery disease (CAD) in younger age groupsCongenital heart disease and other diseases not amenable to surgical correction (1%)

The pathophysiology of cardiomyopathy that may necessitate cardiac replacement depends on the primary disease process. Chronic ischemic conditions precipitate myocardial cell damage, with progressive enlargement of the myocyte followed by cell death and scarring. The condition can be treated with angioplasty or bypass; however, the small-vessel disease is progressive and thus causes progressive loss of myocardial tissue. This eventually results in significant functional loss and progressive cardiac dilatation.

The pathologic process involved in the functional deterioration of a dilated cardiomyopathy is still unclear. Mechanical dilatation and disruption of energy stores appear to play roles.

The pathophysiology of the transplanted heart is unique. The denervation of the organ makes it dependent on its intrinsic rate. As a result of the lack of neuronal input, some left ventricular hypertrophy results. The right-side function is directly dependent on the ischemic time before reimplantation and the adequacy of preservation. The right ventricle is easily damaged and may initially function as a passive conduit until recovery occurs.

The rejection process that can occur in the allograft has 2 primary forms, cellular and humoral. Cellular rejection is the classic form of rejection and is characterized by perivascular infiltration of lymphocytes with subsequent myocyte damage and necrosis if left untreated.

Humoral rejection is much more difficult to characterize and diagnose. It is thought to be a generalized antibody response initiated by several unknown factors. The antibody deposition into the myocardium results in global cardiac dysfunction. This diagnosis is generally made on the basis of clinical suspicion and exclusion; endomyocardial biopsy is of little value in this context.

CAD is a late pathologic process common to all cardiac allografts, characterized by myointimal hyperplasia of small and medium-sized vessels. The lesions are diffuse and may appear any time from 3 months to several years after implantation. The inciting causes are unclear, though cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and chronic rejection have been implicated. The mechanism of the process is thought to depend on growth-factor production in the allograft initiated by circulating lymphocytes. Currently, there is no treatment other than retransplantation.

PreviousNextFuture and Controversies

The future of cardiac transplantation will be determined by the outcomes of several issues. One is the ongoing shortage of donor organs, which has fueled a search for alternative therapies for the failing heart. Such therapies include artificial assist devices, dual-chamber pacing, new drug interventions, and genetic therapy.[10] These efforts have proven to be successful in reducing the need for transplantation. Research in the area of xenografts continues.[11, 12]

Another issue is the prevention of allograft vascular disease, which remains a paramount challenge. The pathology of allograft vascular disease is clearly multifactorial in origin, making the research and therapy equally complex. Resolution of this issue will prolong graft survival and lives.

A third issue is the question of recipient selection and listing status, which continues to pose medical and ethical dilemmas. If the donor situation were not an issue, then the listing of potential recipients would not be troublesome.

The final issue is financial. In this era of cost containment in health care, the escalating costs of heart transplantation raises the questions of who should pay for the therapy and whether the procedure should be available on demand.

PreviousNextIndications

The general indications for cardiac transplantation include deteriorating cardiac function and a prognosis of less than 1 year to live. Specific indications include the following:

Dilated cardiomyopathyIschemic cardiomyopathyCongenital heart disease for which no conventional therapy exists or for which conventional therapy has failedEjection fraction less than 20%Intractable angina or malignant cardiac arrhythmias for which conventional therapy has been exhaustedPulmonary vascular resistance of less than 2 Wood unitsAge younger than 65 yearsAbility to comply with medical follow-up carePreviousNextContraindications

Contraindications for heart transplantation include the following:

Age greater than 65 years - This is a relative contraindication; patients who are older than 65 years are evaluated on an individual basis Fixed pulmonary vascular resistance of greater than 4 Wood unitsActive systemic infectionActive systemic disease such as collagen-vascular disease or sickle cell diseaseActive malignancy - Patients with malignancies who have demonstrated a 3- to 5-year disease-free interval may be considered, depending on the tumor type and the evaluating program An ongoing history of substance abuse (eg, alcohol, drugs, or tobacco)Psychosocial instabilityInability to comply with medical follow-up care[13] PreviousNextOutcomes

The 1-year survival rate after cardiac transplantation is as high as 81.8%, with a 5-year survival rate of 69.8%. A significant number of recipients survive more than 10 years after the procedure. After transplantation, adult patients with congenital heart disease have high 30-day mortality but better late survival.[7] The functional status of the recipient after the procedure is generally excellent, depending on the his or her level of motivation.

In patients with severe biventricular failure who received pneumatic biventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplant, the 1-year actuarial survival rate was 89%, compared with 92% in patients without a ventricular assist device.[14]

Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity are associated with exponential increases in postoperative mortality rates. Heart transplant recipients with all three of these metabolic risk factors were found to have a 63% increased mortality compared to patients without any of the risk factors.[15]

Arnaoutakis et al found that high-risk patients had better 1-year survival rates at high-volume centers (ie, centers that perform more than 15 procedures per year) than at lower volume centers (79% vs 64%, respectively). These differences dissipated among lower-risk patients. Based on these findings, the authors recommended that all high-risk heart transplantation procedures be performed at higher-volume centers.[16]

PreviousProceed to Periprocedural Care , Heart Transplantation

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Practice EssentialsSigns and symptoms

Signs and symptoms of prosthetic heart valve malfunction depend on the type of valve, its location, and the nature of the complication. Presentations may include the following:

Acute prosthetic valve failure: Sudden onset of dyspnea, syncope, or precordial painAcute aortic valve failure: Sudden death; survivors have acute severe dyspnea, sometimes accompanied by precordial pain, or syncope Subacute valvular failure: Symptoms of gradually worsening congestive heart failure; they also may present with unstable angina or, at times, may be entirely asymptomatic Embolic complications: Symptoms related to the site of embolization (eg, stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], sudden death, or symptoms of visceral or peripheral embolization) Anticoagulant-related hemorrhage: Symptoms related to the site of hemorrhage

A history of fever should raise the possibility of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE).

On physical examination, normal prosthetic heart valve sounds include the following:

Mechanical valves: Loud, high-frequency, metallic closing sound; soft opening sound (tilting disc and bileaflet valves); low-frequency opening and closing sounds of nearly equal intensity (caged ball valves) Tissue valves: Closing similar to those of native valves, low-frequency early opening sound in the mitral position

Prosthetic heart valve murmurs noted include the following:

Aortic prosthetic valves: Some degree of outflow obstruction with a resultant systolic ejection murmur (loudest in caged ball and small porcine valves); low-intensity diastolic murmur (tilting disc and bileaflet valves) Mitral prosthetic valves: Low-grade systolic murmur (caged ball valves); short diastolic murmur (bioprostheses and, occasionally, St. Jude bileaflet valves)

Additional findings may include the following:

Acute valvular failure: Evidence of poor tissue perfusion; hyperdynamic precordium and right ventricular impulse (50% of cases); absence of a normal valve closure sound or presence of an abnormal regurgitant murmur Subacute valvular failure: Rales and jugular venous distention; signs of right-side failure; a new regurgitant murmur or absence of normal closing sounds; a new or worsening hemolytic anemia (may be the only presenting abnormality) PVE (often obscure): Fever (97% of cases); a new or changing murmur (56% of cases); classic signs of native valve endocarditis; splenomegaly; congestive heart failure, septic shock, or primary valvular failure; systemic emboli

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Laboratory studies that may be useful include the following:

Complete blood countBlood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levelsUrinalysisBlood cultureProthrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR)

Imaging studies that may be helpful include the following:

Chest radiography: This can help in delineating the valvular morphology and determining whether the valve and occluder are intact; each of the most commonly used valve types has its own characteristic radiographic appearance Echocardiography (2-dimensional, Doppler, transesophageal [the study of choice for a suspected prosthetic valve complication], transthoracic) Cinefluorography: This may detect impaired occluder movement but often cannot readily determine the etiologyComputed tomography: A consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) states that CT should be performed as part of the evaluation of all patients being considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), except those in whom CT is contraindicated,  [1, 2] and that the CT images should be interpreted with a member of the TAVI/TAVR team or reviewed with the operator before the procedure

See Workup for more detail.

Management

In patients with acute valvular failure, diagnostic studies must be performed simultaneously with resuscitative efforts.

Treatment approaches to primary valve failure include the following:

Emergency valve replacementConcomitant adjunctive therapyAfterload reduction and inotropic supportIn selected cases, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

Treatment approaches to PVE include the following:

Intravenous antibiotics administered as soon as 2 sets of blood cultures are drawnCessation of warfarin until central nervous system involvement is ruled out and invasive procedures are determined to be unnecessary[3] Consideration of anticoagulationConsideration of emergency surgery in patients with moderate to severe heart failure or with an unstable prosthesis noted on echocardiography or fluoroscopy

Treatment approaches to thromboembolic complications include the following:

Anticoagulation (if it has not already been initiated or if the patient has a subtherapeutic INR)Assessment of valve functionNote: US dabigatran prescribing information now includes a contraindication in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves[4]

Treatment approaches to prosthetic valve thrombosis include the following:

Surgery (historically the mainstay of treatment but associated with a high mortality)Thrombolytic therapy (appropriate for selected patients with thrombosed prosthetic valves): Should always be performed in conjunction with cardiovascular surgical consultation In cases of major anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, reversal of anticoagulation

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image librarySt. Jude Medical mechanical heart valve. PhotograpSt. Jude Medical mechanical heart valve. Photograph courtesy of St. Jude Medical, Inc. All rights reserved. St. Jude Medical is a registered trademark of St. Jude Medical, Inc. NextBackground

Implantation of prosthetic cardiac valves to treat hemodynamically significant valvular disease has become an increasingly common procedure. It is estimated that more than 60,000 patients per year are undergoing heart valve replacement in the United States. Replacement of diseased valves reduces the morbidity and mortality associated with native valvular disease but comes at the expense of risking complications related to the implanted prosthetic device. These complications include primary valve failure, prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT), thromboembolism, and mechanical hemolytic anemia. In addition, because many of these patients require long-term anticoagulation, anticoagulant-related hemorrhage may occur.

Transcatheter approaches to aortic valve implantation have allowed patients previously felt to be poor operative risks to undergo valve replacement.

Emergency physicians must be able to rapidly identify patients at risk and begin appropriate diagnostic testing, stabilization, and treatment. Even when promptly recognized and treated, acute prosthetic valve failure is associated with a high mortality rate.

More than 80 models of artificial valves have been introduced since 1950. In day-to-day emergency practice, however, it is necessary to be familiar with a few basic types. Prosthetic valves are either created from synthetic material (mechanical prosthesis) or fashioned from biological tissue (bioprosthesis).

Three main designs of mechanical valves exist: the caged ball valve, the tilting disc (single leaflet) valve, and the bileaflet valve. The only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved caged ball valve is the Starr-Edwards valve, shown in the image below.

Starr-Edwards Silastic ball valve mitral Model 612Starr-Edwards Silastic ball valve mitral Model 6120. Reproduced with permission from Baxter International, Inc.

Tilting disc valve models include the Medtronic Hall valve, shown in the image below, Omnicarbon (Medical CV) valves, Monostrut (Alliance Medical Technologies), and the discontinued Bjork-Shiley valves.

Medtronic Hall mitral valve. Reproduced with permiMedtronic Hall mitral valve. Reproduced with permission from Medtronic, Inc.

Bileaflet valves include the St. Jude (St. Jude Medical), shown in the image below, which is the most commonly implanted valve in the United States; CarboMedics valves (Sulzer CarboMedics); ATS Open Pivot valves (ATS Medical); and On-X and Conform-X valves (MCRI).

St. Jude Medical mechanical heart valve. PhotograpSt. Jude Medical mechanical heart valve. Photograph courtesy of St. Jude Medical, Inc. All rights reserved. St. Jude Medical is a registered trademark of St. Jude Medical, Inc.

Bioprosthetic (xenograft) valves are made from porcine valves or bovine pericardium. Porcine models include the Carpentier-Edwards valves (Edwards Lifesciences) and Hancock II and Mosaic valves (Medtronic); both valves are shown in the images below.

Carpentier-Edwards Duralex mitral bioprosthesis (pCarpentier-Edwards Duralex mitral bioprosthesis (porcine). Reproduced with permission from Baxter International, Inc. The Hancock M.O. II aortic bioprosthesis (porcine)The Hancock M.O. II aortic bioprosthesis (porcine). Reproduced with permission from Medtronic, Inc.

Pericardial valves include the Perimount series valves (Edwards LifeSciences). Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves have been discontinued. More recently, stentless porcine valves have been used. They offer improved hemodynamics with a decreased transvalvular pressure gradient when compared with older stented models. These models include the Edwards Prima Plus, Medtronic Freestyle, and Toronto SPV valve (St. Jude Medical).[5]

Homografts or preserved human aortic valves are used in a minority of patients.

Two devices have been approved for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): the SAPIEN XT valve (Edwards LifeSciences), made of bovine pericardium, and the CoreValve (Medtronic), made of porcine pericardium.

PreviousNextPathophysiologyValve failure

Primary valve failure may occur abruptly from the tearing or breakage of components or from a thrombus suddenly impinging on leaflet mobility. More commonly, valve failure presents gradually from calcifications or thrombus formation. Bioprostheses are less thrombogenic than mechanical valves, but this advantage is balanced by their diminished durability when compared with mechanical valves. Although 30-35% of bioprostheses will fail within 10-15 years, it can be anticipated that most mechanical valves will remain functional for 20-30 years.

Stenosis or incompetence of prosthetic valves occurs and may be due to a tear or perforation of the valve cusp, valvular thrombosis, pannus formation, valve calcification, or stiffening of the leaflets.

Primary failure of mechanical valves may be caused by suture line dehiscence, thrombus formation, or breakage or separation of the valve components. Acute valvular regurgitation or embolization of the valve fragments may result.

When the mitral valve acutely fails, rapid left atrial volume overload causes increased left atrial pressure. Pulmonary venous congestion and, ultimately, pulmonary edema occur. Cardiac output is decreased because a portion of the left ventricular output is being regurgitated into the left atrium. The compensatory mechanism of increased sympathetic tone increases the heart rate and the systemic vascular resistance (SVR). This may worsen the situation by decreasing diastolic filling time and impeding left ventricular outflow, thereby increasing the regurgitation.

Acute failure of a prosthetic aortic valve causes a rapidly progressive left ventricular volume overload. Increased left ventricular diastolic pressure results in pulmonary congestion and edema. The cardiac output is reduced substantially. The compensatory mechanism of an increased heart rate and a positive inotropic state, mediated by increased sympathetic tone, partly helps to maintain output. However, this is hampered by an increase in SVR, which impedes forward flow. Increased systolic wall tension causes a rise in myocardial oxygen consumption. Myocardial ischemia in acute aortic regurgitation may occur, even in the absence of coronary artery disease.

Biological prosthetic valves often slowly degenerate over time, become calcified, or suffer from thrombus formation. These events result in the slowly progressive failure of the valve. The presentation is usually that of gradually worsening congestive heart failure, with increasing dyspnea. Alternatively, patients may present with unstable angina or systemic embolization, or they may be entirely asymptomatic.

The first TAVI device for use in the United States was approved in November 2011. Subsequently, not enough time has passed to gather data concerning longevity and use. Vascular complications and strokes related to the procedure are decreasing with improved delivery techniques and equipment. Complications related to the conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker implantation occur in 14% of patients. This risk is increased with the use of the CoreValve prosthesis.[6]

Prosthetic valve endocarditis

PVE occurring within 1 year of implantation (early PVE) usually is due to perioperative contamination or hematogenous spread. PVE occurring after 1 year (late PVE) is usually caused by hematogenous spread.[7]

The pathologic hallmark of PVE in mechanical valves is ring abscesses. Ring abscess may lead to valve dehiscence and perivalvular leakage. Local extension results in the formation of myocardial abscesses. Further extension to the conduction system often results in a new atrioventricular block. Valve stenosis and purulent pericarditis occur less frequently.

Bioprosthetic valve PVE usually causes leaflet tears or perforations. Valve stenosis is more common with bioprosthetic valves than with mechanical valves. Ring abscess, purulent pericarditis, and myocardial abscesses are much less frequent in bioprosthetic valve PVE.

Finally, glomerulonephritis, mycotic aneurysms, systemic embolization, and metastatic abscesses also may complicate PVE.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequency

United States

Prosthetic valve thrombosis is more common in mechanical valves. With proper anticoagulation, the rate of thrombosis in all valves is within the range of 0.1-5.7% per patient-year. Caged ball valves have the highest rate of thromboembolic complications, and bileaflet valves have the lowest. Valve thrombosis is increased with valves in the mitral position and in patients with subtherapeutic anticoagulation.

Anticoagulant-related hemorrhagic complications of mechanical valves include major hemorrhage in 1-3% of patients per year and minor hemorrhage in 4-8% of patients per year. Low-grade hemolytic anemia occurs in 70% of prosthetic heart valve recipients, and severe hemolytic anemia occurs in 3%. The incidence is increased with caged ball valves and in those with perivalvular leaks. Primary valve failure occurs in 3-4% of patients with bioprostheses within 5 years of implantation and in up to 35% of patients within 15 years. Mechanical valves have a much lower incidence of primary failure. PVE occurs in 2-4% of patients. The incidence is 3% in the first postoperative year, then 0.5% for subsequent years. The incidence is higher when valve surgery is performed in patients with active native valve endocarditis. The incidence is higher in mitral valves. Mechanical and biological valves are equally susceptible to early PVE, but the incidence of late PVE is higher for bioprostheses. Despite improvements in surgical techniques, no appreciable change in the incidence has been observed.[8] Mortality/Morbidity

Acute failure of a prosthetic aortic valve usually leads to sudden or near-sudden death. Prompt recognition and treatment of acute prosthetic mitral valve failure can be lifesaving.[7]

PVE has an overall mortality rate of 50%. In early PVE, the mortality rate is 74%. In late PVE, the mortality rate is 43%. The mortality rate with a fungal etiology is 93%. The mortality rate for staphylococcal infections is 86%. PVE due to Staphylococcus has a mortality rate of 25-40%.[7, 8] Fatal anticoagulant-induced hemorrhage occurs in 0.5% of patients per year.Age

In children, bioprostheses rapidly calcify and, therefore, undergo rapid degeneration and valve dysfunction. Incidence of bioprosthetic failure is much higher in patients younger than 40 years. The incidence of having any prosthetic valve complication decreases with age.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Prosthetic Heart Valves

Thursday, February 6, 2014

Practice Essentials

Heart failure develops when the heart, via an abnormality of cardiac function (detectable or not), fails to pump blood at a rate commensurate with the requirements of the metabolizing tissues or is able to do so only with an elevated diastolic filling pressure.

Essential update: New digoxin use associated with high mortality

In a community-based cohort study of 2891 digoxin-naive adults with newly diagnosed systolic heart failure, 18% of whom initiated treatment with digoxin, incident digoxin use was associated with significantly higher rates of death (14.2 versus 11.3 per 100 person-years) during a median of 2.5 years of follow-up. Digoxin use was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of hospitalization for heart failure. Results were similar when analyses were stratified by sex and use of beta-blockers.[1, 2, 3] Digoxin currently occupies places in both US and European guidelines as no more than a second-line agent for systolic HF.

Signs and symptoms

Signs and symptoms of heart failure include the following:

Exertional dyspnea and/or dyspnea at restOrthopneaAcute pulmonary edemaChest pain/pressure and palpitationsTachycardiaFatigue and weaknessNocturia and oliguriaAnorexia, weight loss, nauseaExophthalmos and/or visible pulsation of eyesDistention of neck veinsWeak, rapid, and thready pulseRales, wheezingS3 gallop and/or pulsus alternansIncreased intensity of P2 heart soundHepatojugular refluxAscites, hepatomegaly, and/or anasarcaCentral or peripheral cyanosis, pallor

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Heart failure criteria, classification, and staging

The Framingham criteria for the diagnosis of heart failure consists of the concurrent presence of either 2 major criteria or 1 major and 2 minor criteria.[4]

Major criteria include the following:

Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspneaWeight loss of 4.5 kg in 5 days in response to treatmentNeck vein distentionRalesAcute pulmonary edemaHepatojugular refluxS3 gallopCentral venous pressure greater than 16 cm waterCirculation time of 25 secondsRadiographic cardiomegalyPulmonary edema, visceral congestion, or cardiomegaly at autopsy

Minor criteria are as follows:

Nocturnal coughDyspnea on ordinary exertionA decrease in vital capacity by one third the maximal value recordedPleural effusionTachycardia (rate of 120 bpm)Bilateral ankle edema

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification system categorizes heart failure on a scale of I to IV,[5] as follows:

Class I: No limitation of physical activityClass II: Slight limitation of physical activityClass III: Marked limitation of physical activityClass IV: Symptoms occur even at rest; discomfort with any physical activity

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) staging system is defined by the following 4 stages[6, 7] :

Stage A: High risk of heart failure but no structural heart disease or symptoms of heart failureStage B: Structural heart disease but no symptoms of heart failureStage C: Structural heart disease and symptoms of heart failureStage D: Refractory heart failure requiring specialized interventions

Testing

The following tests may be useful in the initial evaluation for suspected heart failure[6, 8, 9] :

Complete blood count (CBC)UrinalysisElectrolyte levelsRenal and liver function studiesFasting blood glucose levelsLipid profileThyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levelsB-type natriuretic peptide levelsN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptideElectrocardiographyChest radiography2-dimensional (2-D) echocardiographyNuclear imaging[10] Maximal exercise testingPulse oximetry or arterial blood gas

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Treatment includes the following:

Nonpharmacologic therapy: Oxygen and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, dietary sodium and fluid restriction, physical activity as appropriate, and attention to weight gain Pharmacotherapy: Diuretics, vasodilators, inotropic agents, anticoagulants, beta blockers, and digoxin

Surgical options

Surgical treatment options include the following:

Electrophysiologic interventionRevascularization proceduresValve replacement/repairVentricular restorationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationVentricular assist devicesHeart transplantationTotal artificial heart

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image libraryThis chest radiograph shows an enlarged cardiac siThis chest radiograph shows an enlarged cardiac silhouette and edema at the lung bases, signs of acute heart failure. NextBackground

Heart failure is the pathophysiologic state in which the heart, via an abnormality of cardiac function (detectable or not), fails to pump blood at a rate commensurate with the requirements of the metabolizing tissues or is able to do so only with an elevated diastolic filling pressure.

Heart failure (see the images below) may be caused by myocardial failure but may also occur in the presence of near-normal cardiac function under conditions of high demand. Heart failure always causes circulatory failure, but the converse is not necessarily the case, because various noncardiac conditions (eg, hypovolemic shock, septic shock) can produce circulatory failure in the presence of normal, modestly impaired, or even supranormal cardiac function. To maintain the pumping function of the heart, compensatory mechanisms increase blood volume, cardiac filling pressure, heart rate, and cardiac muscle mass. However, despite these mechanisms, there is progressive decline in the ability of the heart to contract and relax, resulting in worsening heart failure.

This chest radiograph shows an enlarged cardiac siThis chest radiograph shows an enlarged cardiac silhouette and edema at the lung bases, signs of acute heart failure. A 28-year-old woman presented with acute heart faiA 28-year-old woman presented with acute heart failure secondary to chronic hypertension. The enlarged cardiac silhouette on this anteroposterior (AP) radiograph is caused by acute heart failure due to the effects of chronic high blood pressure on the left ventricle. The heart then becomes enlarged, and fluid accumulates in the lungs (ie, pulmonary congestion). This magnetic resonance image shows a scar in the This magnetic resonance image shows a scar in the anterior cardiac wall, which may be indicative of a previous myocardial infarction (MI). MIs can precipitate heart failure.

Signs and symptoms of heart failure include tachycardia and manifestations of venous congestion (eg, edema) and low cardiac output (eg, fatigue). Breathlessness is a cardinal symptom of left ventricular (LV) failure that may manifest with progressively increasing severity.

Heart failure can be classified according to a variety of factors (see Heart Failure Criteria and Classification). The New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification for heart failure comprises 4 classes, based on the relationship between symptoms and the amount of effort required to provoke them, as follows[5] :

Class I patients have no limitation of physical activityClass II patients have slight limitation of physical activityClass III patients have marked limitation of physical activityClass IV patients have symptoms even at rest and are unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) heart failure guidelines complement the NYHA classification to reflect the progression of disease and are divided into 4 stages, as follows[6, 7] :

Stage A patients are at high risk for heart failure but have no structural heart disease or symptoms of heart failureStage B patients have structural heart disease but have no symptoms of heart failureStage C patients have structural heart disease and have symptoms of heart failureStage D patients have refractory heart failure requiring specialized interventions

Laboratory studies for heart failure should include a complete blood count (CBC), electrolytes, and renal function studies. Imaging studies such as chest radiography and 2-dimensional echocardiography are recommended in the initial evaluation of patients with known or suspected heart failure. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels can be useful in differentiating cardiac and noncardiac causes of dyspnea. (See the Workup Section for more information.)

In acute heart failure, patient care consists of stabilizing the patient's clinical condition; establishing the diagnosis, etiology, and precipitating factors; and initiating therapies to provide rapid symptom relief and survival benefit. Surgical options for heart failure include revascularization procedures, electrophysiologic intervention, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), valve replacement or repair, ventricular restoration, heart transplantation, and ventricular assist devices (VADs). (See the Treatment Section for more information.)

The goals of pharmacotherapy are to increase survival and to prevent complications. Along with oxygen, medications assisting with symptom relief include diuretics, digoxin, inotropes, and morphine. Drugs that can exacerbate heart failure should be avoided (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], calcium channel blockers [CCBs], and most antiarrhythmic drugs). (See the Medication Section for more information.)

For further information, see the Medscape Reference articles Pediatric Congestive Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure Imaging, Heart Transplantation, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.

PreviousNextPathophysiology

The common pathophysiologic state that perpetuates the progression of heart failure is extremely complex, regardless of the precipitating event. Compensatory mechanisms exist on every level of organization, from subcellular all the way through organ-to-organ interactions. Only when this network of adaptations becomes overwhelmed does heart failure ensue.[11, 12, 13, 14, 15]

Adaptations

Most important among the adaptations are the following[16] :

The Frank-Starling mechanism, in which an increased preload helps to sustain cardiac performanceAlterations in myocyte regeneration and deathMyocardial hypertrophy with or without cardiac chamber dilatation, in which the mass of contractile tissue is augmentedActivation of neurohumoral systems

The release of norepinephrine by adrenergic cardiac nerves augments myocardial contractility and includes activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS], the sympathetic nervous system [SNS], and other neurohumoral adjustments that act to maintain arterial pressure and perfusion of vital organs.

In acute heart failure, the finite adaptive mechanisms that may be adequate to maintain the overall contractile performance of the heart at relatively normal levels become maladaptive when trying to sustain adequate cardiac performance.[17]

The primary myocardial response to chronic increased wall stress is myocyte hypertrophy, death/apoptosis, and regeneration.[18] This process eventually leads to remodeling, usually the eccentric type. Eccentric remodeling further worsens the loading conditions on the remaining myocytes and perpetuates the deleterious cycle. The idea of lowering wall stress to slow the process of remodeling has long been exploited in treating heart failure patients.[19]

The reduction of cardiac output following myocardial injury sets into motion a cascade of hemodynamic and neurohormonal derangements that provoke activation of neuroendocrine systems, most notably the above-mentioned adrenergic systems and RAAS.[20]

The release of epinephrine and norepinephrine, along with the vasoactive substances endothelin-1 (ET-1) and vasopressin, causes vasoconstriction, which increases calcium afterload and, via an increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), causes an increase in cytosolic calcium entry. The increased calcium entry into the myocytes augments myocardial contractility and impairs myocardial relaxation (lusitropy).

The calcium overload may induce arrhythmias and lead to sudden death. The increase in afterload and myocardial contractility (known as inotropy) and the impairment in myocardial lusitropy lead to an increase in myocardial energy expenditure and a further decrease in cardiac output. The increase in myocardial energy expenditure leads to myocardial cell death/apoptosis, which results in heart failure and further reduction in cardiac output, perpetuating a cycle of further increased neurohumoral stimulation and further adverse hemodynamic and myocardial responses.

In addition, the activation of the RAAS leads to salt and water retention, resulting in increased preload and further increases in myocardial energy expenditure. Increases in renin, mediated by decreased stretch of the glomerular afferent arteriole, reduce delivery of chloride to the macula densa and increase beta1-adrenergic activity as a response to decreased cardiac output. This results in an increase in angiotensin II (Ang II) levels and, in turn, aldosterone levels, causing stimulation of the release of aldosterone. Ang II, along with ET-1, is crucial in maintaining effective intravascular homeostasis mediated by vasoconstriction and aldosterone-induced salt and water retention.

The concept of the heart as a self-renewing organ is a relatively recent development.[21] This new paradigm for myocyte biology has created an entire field of research aimed directly at augmenting myocardial regeneration. The rate of myocyte turnover has been shown to increase during times of pathologic stress.[18] In heart failure, this mechanism for replacement becomes overwhelmed by an even faster increase in the rate of myocyte loss. This imbalance of hypertrophy and death over regeneration is the final common pathway at the cellular level for the progression of remodeling and heart failure.

Ang II

Research indicates that local cardiac Ang II production (which decreases lusitropy, increases inotropy, and increases afterload) leads to increased myocardial energy expenditure. Ang II has also been shown in vitro and in vivo to increase the rate of myocyte apoptosis.[22] In this fashion, Ang II has similar actions to norepinephrine in heart failure.

Ang II also mediates myocardial cellular hypertrophy and may promote progressive loss of myocardial function. The neurohumoral factors above lead to myocyte hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis, resulting in increased myocardial volume and increased myocardial mass, as well as myocyte loss. As a result, the cardiac architecture changes, which, in turn, leads to further increase in myocardial volume and mass.

Myocytes and myocardial remodeling

In the failing heart, increased myocardial volume is characterized by larger myocytes approaching the end of their life cycle.[23] As more myocytes drop out, an increased load is placed on the remaining myocardium, and this unfavorable environment is transmitted to the progenitor cells responsible for replacing lost myocytes.

Progenitor cells become progressively less effective as the underlying pathologic process worsens and myocardial failure accelerates. These features—namely, the increased myocardial volume and mass, along with a net loss of myocytes—are the hallmark of myocardial remodeling. This remodeling process leads to early adaptive mechanisms, such as augmentation of stroke volume (Frank-Starling mechanism) and decreased wall stress (Laplace's law), and, later, to maladaptive mechanisms such as increased myocardial oxygen demand, myocardial ischemia, impaired contractility, and arrhythmogenesis.

As heart failure advances, there is a relative decline in the counterregulatory effects of endogenous vasodilators, including nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandins (PGs), bradykinin (BK), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). This decline occurs simultaneously with the increase in vasoconstrictor substances from the RAAS and the adrenergic system, which fosters further increases in vasoconstriction and thus preload and afterload. This results in cellular proliferation, adverse myocardial remodeling, and antinatriuresis, with total body fluid excess and worsening of heart failure symptoms.

Systolic and diastolic failure

Systolic and diastolic heart failure each result in a decrease in stroke volume. This leads to activation of peripheral and central baroreflexes and chemoreflexes that are capable of eliciting marked increases in sympathetic nerve traffic.

While there are commonalities in the neurohormonal responses to decreased stroke volume, the neurohormone-mediated events that follow have been most clearly elucidated for individuals with systolic heart failure. The ensuing elevation in plasma norepinephrine directly correlates with the degree of cardiac dysfunction and has significant prognostic implications. Norepinephrine, while directly toxic to cardiac myocytes, is also responsible for a variety of signal-transduction abnormalities, such as down-regulation of beta1-adrenergic receptors, uncoupling of beta2-adrenergic receptors, and increased activity of inhibitory G-protein. Changes in beta1-adrenergic receptors result in overexpression and promote myocardial hypertrophy.

ANP and BNP

ANP and BNP are endogenously generated peptides activated in response to atrial and ventricular volume/pressure expansion. ANP and BNP are released from the atria and ventricles, respectively, and both promote vasodilation and natriuresis. Their hemodynamic effects are mediated by decreases in ventricular filling pressures, owing to reductions in cardiac preload and afterload. BNP, in particular, produces selective afferent arteriolar vasodilation and inhibits sodium reabsorption in the proximal convoluted tubule. It also inhibits renin and aldosterone release and, therefore, adrenergic activation. ANP and BNP are elevated in chronic heart failure. BNP, in particular, has potentially important diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications.

For more information, see the Medscape Reference article Natriuretic Peptides in Congestive Heart Failure.

Other vasoactive systems

Other vasoactive systems that play a role in the pathogenesis of heart failure include the ET receptor system, the adenosine receptor system, vasopressin, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha).[24] ET, a substance produced by the vascular endothelium, may contribute to the regulation of myocardial function, vascular tone, and peripheral resistance in heart failure. Elevated levels of ET-1 closely correlate with the severity of heart failure. ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor and has exaggerated vasoconstrictor effects in the renal vasculature, reducing renal plasma blood flow, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and sodium excretion.

TNF-alpha has been implicated in response to various infectious and inflammatory conditions. Elevations in TNF-alpha levels have been consistently observed in heart failure and seem to correlate with the degree of myocardial dysfunction. Some studies suggest that local production of TNF-alpha may have toxic effects on the myocardium, thus worsening myocardial systolic and diastolic function.

In individuals with systolic dysfunction, therefore, the neurohormonal responses to decreased stroke volume result in temporary improvement in systolic blood pressure and tissue perfusion. However, in all circumstances, the existing data support the notion that these neurohormonal responses contribute to the progression of myocardial dysfunction in the long term.

Heart failure with normal ejection fraction

In diastolic heart failure (heart failure with normal ejection fraction [HFNEF]), the same pathophysiologic processes occur that lead to decreased cardiac output in systolic heart failure, but they do so in response to a different set of hemodynamic and circulatory environmental factors that depress cardiac output.[25]

In HFNEF, altered relaxation and increased stiffness of the ventricle (due to delayed calcium uptake by the myocyte sarcoplasmic reticulum and delayed calcium efflux from the myocyte) occur in response to an increase in ventricular afterload (pressure overload). The impaired relaxation of the ventricle then leads to impaired diastolic filling of the left ventricle (LV).

Morris et al found that RV subendocardial systolic dysfunction and diastolic dysfunction, as detected by echocardiographic strain rate imaging, are common in patients with HFNEF. This dysfunction is potentially associated with the same fibrotic processes that affect the subendocardial layer of the LV and, to a lesser extent, with RV pressure overload. This may play a role in the symptomatology of patients with HFNEF.[26]

LV chamber stiffness

An increase in LV chamber stiffness occurs secondary to any one of, or any combination of, the following 3 mechanisms:

Rise in filling pressureShift to a steeper ventricular pressure-volume curveDecrease in ventricular distensibility

A rise in filling pressure is the movement of the ventricle up along its pressure-volume curve to a steeper portion, as may occur in conditions such as volume overload secondary to acute valvular regurgitation or acute LV failure due to myocarditis.

A shift to a steeper ventricular pressure-volume curve results, most commonly, not only from increased ventricular mass and wall thickness (as observed in aortic stenosis and long-standing hypertension) but also from infiltrative disorders (eg, amyloidosis), endomyocardial fibrosis, and myocardial ischemia.

Parallel upward displacement of the diastolic pressure-volume curve is generally referred to as a decrease in ventricular distensibility. This is usually caused by extrinsic compression of the ventricles.

Concentric LV hypertrophy

Pressure overload that leads to concentric LV hypertrophy (LVH), as occurs in aortic stenosis, hypertension, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, shifts the diastolic pressure-volume curve to the left along its volume axis. As a result, ventricular diastolic pressure is abnormally elevated, although chamber stiffness may or may not be altered.

Increases in diastolic pressure lead to increased myocardial energy expenditure, remodeling of the ventricle, increased myocardial oxygen demand, myocardial ischemia, and eventual progression of the maladaptive mechanisms of the heart that lead to decompensated heart failure.

Arrhythmias

While life-threatening rhythms are more common in ischemic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia imparts a significant burden in all forms of heart failure. In fact, some arrhythmias even perpetuate heart failure. The most significant of all rhythms associated with heart failure are the life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Structural substrates for ventricular arrhythmias that are common in heart failure, regardless of the underlying cause, include ventricular dilatation, myocardial hypertrophy, and myocardial fibrosis.

At the cellular level, myocytes may be exposed to increased stretch, wall tension, catecholamines, ischemia, and electrolyte imbalance. The combination of these factors contributes to an increased incidence of arrhythmogenic sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure.

PreviousNextEtiology

Most patients who present with significant heart failure do so because of an inability to provide adequate cardiac output in that setting. This is often a combination of the causes listed below in the setting of an abnormal myocardium. The list of causes responsible for presentation of a patient with heart failure exacerbation is very long, and searching for the proximate cause to optimize therapeutic interventions is important.

From a clinical standpoint, classifying the causes of heart failure into the following 4 broad categories is useful:

Underlying causes: Underlying causes of heart failure include structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation, pericardium, myocardium, or cardiac valves, thus leading to increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency Fundamental causes: Fundamental causes include the biochemical and physiologic mechanisms, through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction Precipitating causes: Overt heart failure may be precipitated by progression of the underlying heart disease (eg, further narrowing of a stenotic aortic valve or mitral valve) or various conditions (fever, anemia, infection) or medications (chemotherapy, NSAIDs) that alter the homeostasis of heart failure patients Genetics of cardiomyopathy: Dilated, arrhythmic right ventricular and restrictive cardiomyopathies are known genetic causes of heart failure. Underlying causes

Specific underlying factors cause various forms of heart failure, such as systolic heart failure (most commonly, left ventricular systolic dysfunction), heart failure with preserved LVEF, acute heart failure, high-output heart failure, and right heart failure.

Underlying causes of systolic heart failure include the following:

Coronary artery diseaseDiabetes mellitusHypertensionValvular heart disease (stenosis or regurgitant lesions)Arrhythmia (supraventricular or ventricular)Infections and inflammation (myocarditis)Peripartum cardiomyopathyCongenital heart diseaseDrugs (either recreational, such as alcohol and cocaine, or therapeutic drugs with cardiac side effects, such as doxorubicin)Idiopathic cardiomyopathyRare conditions (endocrine abnormalities, rheumatologic disease, neuromuscular conditions)

Underlying causes of diastolic heart failure include the following:

Coronary artery diseaseDiabetes mellitusHypertensionValvular heart disease (aortic stenosis)Hypertrophic cardiomyopathyRestrictive cardiomyopathy (amyloidosis, sarcoidosis)Constrictive pericarditis

Underlying causes of acute heart failure include the following:

Acute valvular (mitral or aortic) regurgitationMyocardial infarctionMyocarditisArrhythmiaDrugs (eg, cocaine, calcium channel blockers, or beta-blocker overdose)Sepsis

Underlying causes of high-output heart failure include the following:

AnemiaSystemic arteriovenous fistulasHyperthyroidismBeriberi heart diseasePaget disease of boneAlbright syndrome (fibrous dysplasia)Multiple myelomaPregnancyGlomerulonephritisPolycythemia veraCarcinoid syndrome

Underlying causes of right heart failure include the following:

Left ventricular failureCoronary artery disease (ischemia)Pulmonary hypertensionPulmonary valve stenosisPulmonary embolismChronic pulmonary diseaseNeuromuscular diseasePrecipitating causes of heart failure

A previously stable, compensated patient may develop heart failure that is clinically apparent for the first time when the intrinsic process has advanced to a critical point, such as with further narrowing of a stenotic aortic valve or mitral valve. Alternatively, decompensation may occur as a result of failure or exhaustion of the compensatory mechanisms but without any change in the load on the heart in patients with persistent, severe pressure or volume overload. In particular, consider whether the patient has underlying coronary artery disease or valvular heart disease.

The most common cause of decompensation in a previously compensated patient with heart failure is inappropriate reduction in the intensity of treatment, such as dietary sodium restriction, physical activity reduction, or drug regimen reduction. Uncontrolled hypertension is the second most common cause of decompensation, followed closely by cardiac arrhythmias (most commonly, atrial fibrillation). Arrhythmias, particularly ventricular arrhythmias, can be life threatening. Also, patients with one form of underlying heart disease that may be well compensated can develop heart failure when a second form of heart disease ensues. For example, a patient with chronic hypertension and asymptomatic LVH may be asymptomatic until a myocardial infarction (MI) develops and precipitates heart failure.

Systemic infection or the development of unrelated illness can also lead to heart failure. Systemic infection precipitates heart failure by increasing total metabolism as a consequence of fever, discomfort, and cough, increasing the hemodynamic burden on the heart. Septic shock, in particular, can precipitate heart failure by the release of endotoxin-induced factors that can depress myocardial contractility.

Cardiac infection and inflammation can also endanger the heart. Myocarditis or infective endocarditis may directly impair myocardial function and exacerbate existing heart disease. The anemia, fever, and tachycardia that frequently accompany these processes are also deleterious. In the case of infective endocarditis, the additional valvular damage that ensues may precipitate cardiac decompensation.

Patients with heart failure, particularly when confined to bed, are at high risk of developing pulmonary emboli, which can increase the hemodynamic burden on the right ventricle by further elevating right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure, possibly causing fever, tachypnea, and tachycardia.

Intense, prolonged physical exertion or severe fatigue, such as may result from prolonged travel or emotional crisis, is a relatively common precipitant of cardiac decompensation. The same is true of exposure to severe climate change (ie, the individual comes in contact with a hot, humid environment or a bitterly cold one).

Excessive intake of water and/or sodium and the administration of cardiac depressants or drugs that cause salt retention are other factors that can lead to heart failure.

Because of increased myocardial oxygen consumption and demand beyond a critical level, the following high-output states can precipitate the clinical presentation of heart failure:

Profound anemiaThyrotoxicosisMyxedemaPaget disease of boneAlbright syndromeMultiple myelomaGlomerulonephritisCor pulmonalePolycythemia veraObesityCarcinoid syndromePregnancyNutritional deficiencies (eg, thiamine deficiency, beriberi)

Longitudinal data from the Framingham Heart Study suggests that antecedent subclinical left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction is associated with an increased incidence of heart failure, supporting the notion that heart failure is a progressive syndrome.[27, 28] Another analysis of over 36,000 patients undergoing outpatient echocardiography reported that moderate or severe diastolic dysfunction, but not mild diastolic dysfunction, is an independent predictor of mortality.[29]

Genetics of cardiomyopathy

Autosomal dominant inheritance has been demonstrated in dilated cardiomyopathy and in arrhythmic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Restrictive cardiomyopathies are usually sporadic and associated with the gene for cardiac troponin I. Genetic tests are available at major genetic centers for cardiomyopathies.[30]

In families with a first-degree relative who has been diagnosed with a cardiomyopathy leading to heart failure, the at-risk patient should be screened and followed.[30] The recommended screening consists of an electrocardiogram and an echocardiogram. If the patient has an asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, it should be treated.[30]

PreviousNextEpidemiologyUnited States statistics

According to the American Heart Association, heart failure affects nearly 5.7 million Americans of all ages[31] and is responsible for more hospitalizations than all forms of cancer combined. It is the number 1 cause of hospitalization for Medicare patients. With improved survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction and with a population that continues to age, heart failure will continue to increase in prominence as a major health problem in the United States.[32, 33, 34, 35]

Analysis of national and regional trends in hospitalization and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries from 1998-2008 showed a relative decline of 29.5% in heart failure hospitalizations[36] ; however, wide variations are noted between states and races, with black men having the slowest rate of decline. A relative decline of 6.6% in mortality was also observed, although the rate was uneven across states. The length of stay decreased from 6.8 days to 6.4 days, despite an overall increase in the comorbid conditions.[36]

Heart failure statistics for the United States are as follows:

Heart failure is the fastest-growing clinical cardiac disease entity in the United States, affecting 2% of the populationHeart failure accounts for 34% of cardiovascular-related deaths[31] Approximately 670,000 new cases of heart failure are diagnosed each year[31] About 277,000 deaths are caused by heart failure each year[31] Heart failure is the most frequent cause of hospitalization in patients older than 65 years, with an annual incidence of 10 per 1,000[31] Rehospitalization rates during the 6 months following discharge are as much as 50%[37] Nearly 2% of all hospital admissions in the United States are for decompensated heart failure, and the average duration of hospitalization is about 6 days In 2010, the estimated total cost of heart failure in the United States was $39.2 billion,[38] representing 1-2% of all health care expenditures

The incidence and prevalence of heart failure are higher in blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, and recent immigrants from developing nations, Russia, and the former Soviet republics. The higher prevalence of heart failure in blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans is directly related to the higher incidence and prevalence of hypertension and diabetes. This problem is particularly exacerbated by a lack of access to health care and by substandard preventive health care available to the most indigent of individuals in these and other groups; in addition, many persons in these groups do not have adequate health insurance.

The higher incidence and prevalence of heart failure in recent immigrants from developing nations are largely due to a lack of prior preventive health care, a lack of treatment, or substandard treatment for common conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, rheumatic fever, and ischemic heart disease.

Men and women have the same incidence and the same prevalence of heart failure. However, there are still many differences between men and women with heart failure, such as the following:

Women tend to develop heart failure later in life than men doWomen are more likely than men to have preserved systolic functionWomen develop depression more commonly than men doWomen have signs and symptoms of heart failure similar to those of men, but they are more pronounced in womenWomen survive longer with heart failure than men do

The prevalence of heart failure increases with age. The prevalence is 1-2% of the population younger than 55 years and increases to a rate of 10% for persons older than 75 years. Nonetheless, heart failure can occur at any age, depending on the cause.

International statistics

Heart failure is a worldwide problem. The most common cause of heart failure in industrialized countries is ischemic cardiomyopathy, with other causes, including Chagas disease and valvular cardiomyopathy, assuming a more important role in developing countries. However, in developing nations that have become more urbanized and more affluent, eating a more processed diet and leading a more sedentary lifestyle have resulted in an increased rate of heart failure, along with increased rates of diabetes and hypertension. This change was illustrated in a population study in Soweto, South Africa, where the community transformed into a more urban and westernized city, followed by an increase in diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure.[39]

In terms of treatment, one study showed few important differences in uptake of key therapies in European countries with widely differing cultures and varying economic status for patients with heart failure. In contrast, studies of sub-Saharan Africa, where health care resources are more limited, have shown poor outcomes in specific populations.[40, 41] For example, in some countries, hypertensive heart failure carries a 25% 1-year mortality rate, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–associated cardiomyopathy generally progresses to death within 100 days of diagnosis in patients who are not treated with antiretroviral drugs.

While data regarding developing nations are not as robust as studies of Western society, the following trends in developing nations are apparent:

Causes tend to be largely nonischemicPatients tend to present at a younger ageOutcomes are largely worse where health care resources are limitedIsolated right heart failure tends to be more prominent, with a variety of causes having been postulated, ranging from tuberculous pericardial disease to lung disease and pollution PreviousNextPrognosis

In general, the mortality following hospitalization for patients with heart failure is 10.4% at 30 days, 22% at 1 year, and 42.3% at 5 years, despite marked improvement in medical and device therapy.[31, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46] Each rehospitalization increases mortality by about 20-22%.[31]

Mortality is greater than 50% for patients with NYHA class IV, ACC/AHA stage D heart failure. Heart failure associated with acute MI has an inpatient mortality of 20-40%; mortality approaches 80% in patients who are also hypotensive (eg, cardiogenic shock). (See Heart Failure Criteria and Classification).

Numerous demographic, clinical and biochemical variables have been reported to provide important prognostic value in patients with heart failure, and several predictive models have been developed.[47]

A study by van Diepen et al suggests that patients with heart failure or atrial fibrillation have a significantly higher risk of noncardiac postoperative mortality than patients with coronary artery disease; this risk should be considered even if a minor procedure is planned.[48]

A study by Bursi et al found that among community patients with heart failure, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), assessed by Doppler echocardiography, can strongly predict death and can provide incremental and clinically significant prognostic information independent of known outcome predictors.[49]

Higher concentrations of galectin-3, a marker of cardiac fibrosis, were associated with an increased risk for incident heart failure (hazard ratio: 1.28 per 1 SD increase in log galectin-3) in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Galectin-3 was also associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio: 1.15).[50]

PreviousNextPatient Education

To help prevent recurrence of heart failure in patients in whom heart failure was caused by dietary factors or medication noncompliance, counsel and educate such patients about the importance of proper diet and the necessity of medication compliance. Dunlay et al examined medication use and adherence among community-dwelling patients with heart failure and found that medication adherence was suboptimal in many patients, often because of cost.[51] A randomized controlled trial of 605 patients with heart failure reported that the incidence of all-cause hospitalization or death was not reduced in patients receiving multi-session self-care training compared to those receiving a single session intervention. The optimum method for patient education remains to be established. It appears that more intensive interventions are not necessarily better.[52]

For patient education information, see the Heart Health Center, Cholesterol Center, and Diabetes Center, as well as Congestive Heart Failure, High Cholesterol, Chest Pain, Heart Rhythm Disorders, Coronary Heart Disease, and Heart Attack.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Heart Failure

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Background

Alcohol consumed in large quantities for many years has long been recognized to induce an alcoholic cardiomyopathy. Clinically identical to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, alcoholic cardiomyopathy is a major form of secondary dilated cardiomyopathy in the Western world. (See Medscape Reference articles Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy and Dilated Cardiomyopathy.) With this change in cardiac structure and decline in function, there exists the substrate for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. However, only within the past 20-25 years has the arrhythmogenic potential of short-term alcohol consumption been elucidated in patients without clinically evident heart failure.

In 1978, Ettinger et al conducted a study evaluating 32 separate dysrhythmic episodes in 24 patients. These patients consumed alcohol heavily and regularly; in addition, they took part in a weekend or holiday drinking binge immediately prior to evaluation. Based on the results of this study, the term holiday heart syndrome was coined. It was defined as an acute cardiac rhythm and/or conduction disturbance, most commonly supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, associated with heavy ethanol consumption in a person without other clinical evidence of heart disease. Typically, this resolved rapidly with spontaneous recovery during subsequent abstinence from alcohol use.[1]

Holiday heart syndrome now most commonly refers to the association between alcohol use and rhythm disturbances, particularly supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in apparently healthy people. Similar reports have indicated that recreational use of marijuana may have similar effects.[2] The most common rhythm disorder is atrial fibrillation, which usually converts to normal sinus rhythm within 24 hours.[3] Holiday heart syndrome should be particularly considered as a diagnosis in patients without structural heart disease and with new-onset atrial fibrillation.[4] Although the syndrome can recur, its clinical course is benign, and specific antiarrhythmic therapy is usually not indicated. Interestingly, even modest alcohol intake can be identified as a trigger in some patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.[5]

NextPathophysiology

Several mechanisms are theorized to be responsible for the arrhythmogenicity of alcohol. These include an increased secretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine, increased sympathetic output, a rise in the level of plasma free fatty acids, and an indirect effect through acetaldehyde, the primary metabolite of alcohol, or fatty acid ethyl esters, a cardiac alcohol metabolite.[6] Alcohol can also directly decrease sodium current and can affect intracellular pH, ether causing acidosis with low doses or alkalosis with higher doses. Interestingly, these effects may be species specific, with rabbits[7] and humans being similarly affected while the dog atria appear unaffected[8] .

Analysis of ECGs performed following resolution of arrhythmias in patients who have consumed a large quantity of alcohol show significant prolongation of the PR, QRS, and QT intervals compared with patients who experienced arrhythmias in the absence of alcohol consumption.[9] The arrhythmogenicity of alcohol has also been examined in the electrophysiology laboratory.

One study evaluated 14 patients with a history of significant alcohol consumption. Initially, the atrial and ventricular extrastimulus technique induced nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 1 patient, nonsustained atrial fibrillation in 1 patient, paired ventricular responses in 1 patient, and no response in the remaining 11 patients. Following administration of alcohol, 10 of the 14 patients developed sustained or nonsustained tachyarrhythmias in response to the extrastimulus technique, with significant prolongation of His-ventricular conduction.[10]

In another study, ingestion of whiskey resulted in no change in the atrial refractory period but facilitated induction of atrial flutter in individuals who were chronic drinkers and those who were nondrinkers. This evidence strongly suggests that alcohol possesses proarrhythmic properties. These seem to be more pronounced in patients with larger P wave dispersion. Although ventricular repolarization abnormalities on surface ECG were described, whether ventricular myocardium responds similarly to ethanol is uncertain. One case of ventricular fibrillation was described in a patient with heavy alcohol ingestion, but an electrophysiologic study (EPS) revealed only inducibility of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response but no ventricular arrhythmias.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequencyUnited States

The frequency with which cardiac arrhythmias can be attributed to alcohol use is unclear owing to differing data. One study showed alcohol as the causative agent in 35% of cases of new-onset atrial fibrillation and in 63% of cases in patients younger than 65 years.[11] Conversely, another study showed only about 5-10% of all new episodes of atrial fibrillation to be explainable by alcohol use.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common rhythm disturbance associated with alcohol consumption. Atrial flutter, isolated ventricular premature beats, isolated atrial premature beats, junctional tachycardia, and various other rhythm disturbances may occur with less frequency.

International

Worldwide prevalence is not well documented. Prevalence is presumably increased in countries with higher rates of alcohol ingestion and alcoholism.

Mortality/Morbidity

Regular consumption of alcohol in modest amounts does not seem to have the same potential to cause arrhythmias as alcohol consumed in heavy amounts. In fact, it has been shown in a sample of patients whose usual daily alcohol intake exceeds 6 drinks that the risk of developing atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and atrial premature beats is at least twice that of patients who drink alcohol at least monthly but who on average consume less than a single drink daily.

Race

Evidence regarding race is unavailable.

Sex

An increased incidence of the holiday heart syndrome has not been clearly documented in males; however, this can be inferred as males have a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation and alcoholism.

Age

Although atrial fibrillation increases with age, it is unclear if holiday heart syndrome is more common in elderly patients, since this age group is more likely to have structural heart disease.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Holiday Heart Syndrome

Friday, January 17, 2014

Overview

The cause of hypertensive heart disease is chronically elevated blood pressure (BP); however, the causes of elevated BP are diverse. Essential hypertension accounts for 90% of cases of hypertension in adults. Secondary causes of hypertension account for the remaining 10% of cases of chronically elevated BP.

According to the Framingham Study, hypertension accounts for about one quarter of heart failure cases.[1] In the elderly population, as many as 68% of heart failure cases are attributed to hypertension.[2] Community-based studies have demonstrated that hypertension may contribute to the development of heart failure in as many as 50-60% of patients. In patients with hypertension, the risk of heart failure is increased by 2-fold in men and by 3-fold in women.

Cardiovascular effects of hypertension

Uncontrolled and prolonged elevation of BP can lead to a variety of changes in the myocardial structure, coronary vasculature, and conduction system of the heart. These changes in turn can lead to the development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), coronary artery disease (CAD), various conduction system diseases, and systolic and diastolic dysfunction of the myocardium, complications that manifest clinically as angina or myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmias (especially atrial fibrillation), and congestive heart failure (CHF).

Thus, hypertensive heart disease is a term applied generally to heart diseases, such as LVH (seen in the images below), coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmias, and CHF, that are caused by the direct or indirect effects of elevated BP. Although these diseases generally develop in response to chronically elevated BP, marked and acute elevation of BP can lead to accentuation of an underlying predisposition to any of the symptoms traditionally associated with chronic hypertension.

Two-dimensional echocardiogram (parasternal long aTwo-dimensional echocardiogram (parasternal long axis view) from a 70-year-old woman showing concentric left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial enlargement. Gross specimen of the heart with concentric left vGross specimen of the heart with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy. Differentials

The following conditions should also be considered when evaluating hypertensive heart disease:

Coronary artery atherosclerosisHypertrophic cardiomyopathyAthlete's heart (with LVH)Congestive heart failure due to other etiologiesAtrial fibrillation due to other etiologiesDiastolic dysfunction due to other etiologiesSleep apneaPatient education

It is important to educate patients about the nature of their disease and the risks associated with untreated hypertension. In addition, dietary modifications and the importance of regular exercise, taking medications regularly, weight loss, and avoiding medications and foods that can potentially elevate blood pressure should be emphasized.

For patient education information, see the Diabetes Center and the Cholesterol Center, as well as High Blood Pressure, High Cholesterol, Chest Pain, Coronary Heart Disease, and Heart Attack.

NextEtiology

The etiology of hypertensive heart disease is a complex interplay of various hemodynamic, structural, neuroendocrine, cellular, and molecular factors. These factors play integral roles in the development of hypertension and its complications; however, elevated BP itself can modulate these factors.

Obesity has been linked to hypertension and LVH in various epidemiologic studies, with as many as 50% of obese patients having some degree of hypertension and as many as 60-70% of patients with hypertension being obese.

Elevated BP leads to adverse changes in cardiac structure and function in 2 ways: directly, by increased afterload, and indirectly, by associated neurohormonal and vascular changes. Elevated 24-hour ambulatory BP and nocturnal BP have been demonstrated to be more closely related to various cardiac pathologies, especially in black persons. The pathophysiologies of the various cardiac effects of hypertension differ and are described in this section.

Left ventricular hypertrophy

Of patients with hypertension, 15-20% develop LVH. The risk of LVH is increased 2-fold by associated obesity. The prevalence of LVH based on electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, which are not a sensitive marker at the time of diagnosis of hypertension, is variable.[3, 4] Studies have shown a direct relationship between the level and duration of elevated BP and LVH.[5]

LVH, defined as an increase in the mass of the left ventricle, is caused by the response of myocytes to various stimuli accompanying elevated BP. Myocyte hypertrophy can occur as a compensatory response to increased afterload. Mechanical and neurohormonal stimuli accompanying hypertension can lead to activation of myocardial cell growth, gene expression (of which some occurs primarily in fetal cardiomyocytes), and, thus, to LVH. In addition, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, through the action of angiotensin II on angiotensin I receptors, leads to growth of interstitium and cell matrix components. In summary, the development of LVH is characterized by myocyte hypertrophy and by an imbalance between the myocytes and the interstitium of the myocardial skeletal structure.

Various patterns of LVH have been described, including concentric remodeling, concentric LVH, and eccentric LVH. Concentric LVH is an increase in LV thickness and LV mass with increased LV diastolic pressure and volume, commonly observed in persons with hypertension; this is a marker of poor prognosis in these patients. Compare concentric LVH with eccentric LVH, in which LV thickness is increased not uniformly but at certain sites, such as the septum.

Although the development of LVH initially plays a protective role in response to increased wall stress to maintain adequate cardiac output, it later leads to the development of diastolic and, ultimately, systolic myocardial dysfunction.

Interestingly, findings from a prospective study (The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA] trial) also indicate a higher risk of developing systemic hypertension among patients in the higher quartiles of the LV mass at baseline.

Left atrial abnormalities

Frequently underappreciated, structural and functional changes of the left atrium are very common in patients with hypertension. The increased afterload imposed on the LA by the elevated LV end-diastolic pressure secondary to increased BP leads to impairment of the left atrium and left atrial (LA) appendage function, plus increased LA size and thickness.

Increased LA size accompanying hypertension in the absence of valvular heart disease or systolic dysfunction usually implies chronicity of hypertension and may correlate with the severity of LV diastolic dysfunction.

In addition to LA structural changes, these patients are predisposed to atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation, with loss of atrial contribution in the presence of diastolic dysfunction, may precipitate overt heart failure.

Valvular disease

Although valvular disease does not cause hypertensive heart disease, chronic and severe hypertension can cause aortic root dilatation, leading to significant aortic insufficiency. Some degree of hemodynamically insignificant aortic insufficiency is often found in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. An acute rise in BP may accentuate the degree of aortic insufficiency, with return to baseline when the BP is better controlled. In addition to causing aortic regurgitation, hypertension is also thought to accelerate the process of aortic sclerosis and cause mitral regurgitation.

Heart failure

Heart failure is a common complication of chronically elevated BP. Patients with hypertension fall into 1 of the following categories:

Asymptomatic but at risk of developing of heart failure - Stage A or B, per the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) classification, depending on whether or not they have developed structural heart disease as a consequence of hypertension Suffering from symptomatic heart failure - Stage C or D, per the ACC/AHA classification

Hypertension as a cause of CHF is frequently underrecognized, partly because at the time heart failure develops, the dysfunctioning left ventricle is unable to generate the high BP, thus obscuring the heart failure's etiology. The prevalence of asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertension and without LVH may be as high as 33%. Chronically elevated afterload and the resulting LVH can adversely affect the active early relaxation phase and the late compliance phase of ventricular diastole.

Diastolic dysfunction

Diastolic dysfunction is common in persons with hypertension. It is often, but not invariably, accompanied by LVH. In addition to elevated afterload, other factors that may contribute to the development of diastolic dysfunction include coexistent coronary artery disease, aging, systolic dysfunction, and structural abnormalities such as fibrosis and LVH. Asymptomatic systolic dysfunction usually follows.

Systolic dysfunction

Later in the course of disease, the LVH fails to compensate by increasing cardiac output in the face of elevated BP, and the LV cavity begins to dilate to maintain cardiac output. As the disease enters the end stage, LV systolic function decreases further. This leads to further increases in activation of the neurohormonal and renin-angiotensin systems, leading to increases in salt and water retention and increased peripheral vasoconstriction. Eventually, the already compromised LV is overwhelmed, and the patient progresses to the stage of symptomatic systolic dysfunction.

Decompensation

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, stimulated by myocyte hypertrophy and the imbalance between its stimulants and inhibitors, is considered to play an important part in the transition from compensated to decompensated stage. The patient may become symptomatic during the asymptomatic stages of the LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction, owing to changes in afterload conditions or to the presence of other insults to the myocardium (eg, ischemia, infarction). A sudden increase in BP can lead to acute pulmonary edema without necessarily changing the LV ejection fraction.[6]

Generally, development of asymptomatic or symptomatic LV dilatation or dysfunction heralds rapid deterioration in clinical status and a markedly increased risk of death. In addition to LV dysfunction, right ventricular (RV) thickening and diastolic dysfunction also develop as results of septal thickening and LV dysfunction.

Myocardial ischemia

Patients with angina have a high prevalence of hypertension. Hypertension is an established risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease, almost doubling the risk. The development of ischemia in patients with hypertension is multifactorial.

Importantly, in patients with hypertension, angina can occur in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease. The reason for this is 2-fold. Increased afterload secondary to hypertension leads to an increase in LV wall tension and transmural pressure, compromising coronary blood flow during diastole. In addition, the microvasculature beyond the epicardial coronary arteries has been shown to be dysfunctional in patients with hypertension, and it may be unable to compensate for increased metabolic and oxygen demand.

The development and progression of arteriosclerosis, the hallmark of coronary artery disease, is exacerbated in arteries subjected to chronically elevated BP. Shear stress associated with hypertension and the resulting endothelial dysfunction cause impairment in the synthesis and release of the potent vasodilator nitric oxide. A decreased nitric oxide level promotes the development and acceleration of arteriosclerosis and plaque formation. Morphologic features of the plaque are identical to those observed in patients without hypertension.

Cardiac arrhythmias

Cardiac arrhythmias commonly observed in patients with hypertension include atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), and ventricular tachycardia (VT).[7] The risk of sudden cardiac death is increased.[8] Various mechanisms thought to play a part in the pathogenesis of arrhythmias include altered cellular structure and metabolism, inhomogeneity of the myocardium, poor perfusion, myocardial fibrosis, and fluctuation in afterload. All of these may lead to an increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, chronic recurrent, or chronic persistent) is observed frequently in patients with hypertension.[9] In fact, elevated BP is the most common cause of atrial fibrillation in the Western hemisphere. In one study, nearly 50% of patients with atrial fibrillation had hypertension. Although the exact etiology is not known, LA structural abnormalities, associated coronary artery disease, and LVH have been suggested as possible contributing factors. The development of atrial fibrillation can cause decompensation of systolic and, more importantly, diastolic dysfunction, owing to loss of atrial kick, and it also increases the risk of thromboembolic complications, most notably stroke.

Premature ventricular contractions, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death are observed more often in patients with LVH than in those without LVH. The etiology of these arrhythmias is thought to be concomitant coronary artery disease and myocardial fibrosis.

PreviousNextEpidemiology

The estimated prevalence of hypertension in the United States in 2005 was 35.3 million for men and 38.3 million for women. Hypertension is more prevalent in black persons than in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white persons, and this prevalence is increasing.

Data from 1988-1994 and 1999-2002 demonstrated an increased prevalence of hypertension in black individuals from 35.8% to 41.4%. (Although the prevalence in whites is increasing as well, it is not as dramatic a rise.)[10] This difference between the groups is attributed to factors other than race, because the prevalence of hypertension among blacks and whites is the same in the United Kingdom and because hypertension is not very common on the African continent. In addition, hypertension is the most common etiology of heart failure in black persons in the United States.

Systolic BP increases with age; this increase is more marked in men than in women until women reach menopause, when their BP rises more sharply and reaches levels higher than in men. Thus, the prevalence of hypertension is higher in men than in women younger than 55 years, but the rate is higher in women older than 55 years. The prevalence of hypertensive heart disease probably follows the same pattern and is affected by the severity of BP increase.

In a study by Peacock et al, patients presenting with acute heart failure as a manifestation of hypertensive emergency were more likely to be African American. They were also more likely to have a history of heart failure and were more likely to have higher brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and creatinine levels and lower LV ejection fraction.[11]

Although the exact frequency of LVH is unknown, its rate based on ECG findings is 2.9% for men and 1.5% for women. The rate of LVH based on echocardiographic findings is 15-20%. Of patients without LVH, 33% have evidence of asymptomatic LV diastolic dysfunction.

PreviousNextPatient History

Symptoms of hypertensive heart disease depend on the duration, severity, and type of disease. In addition, the patient may or may not be aware of the presence of hypertension, which is why hypertension has been named "the silent killer."

Left ventricular hypertrophy

Patients with LVH alone are totally asymptomatic, unless the LVH leads to the development of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure.

Heart failure

Although symptomatic diastolic heart failure and systolic heart failure are indistinguishable, the clinical history may be quite revealing. In particular, individuals who abruptly develop severe symptoms of CHF and rapidly return to baseline with medical therapy are more likely to have isolated diastolic dysfunction.

Heart failure symptoms include exertional and nonexertional dyspnea (New York Heart Association [NYHA] classes I-IV); orthopnea; paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea; fatigue (more common in systolic dysfunction); ankle edema and weight gain; abdominal pain secondary to a congested, distended liver; and, in severe cases, altered mentation.

Patients can present with acute pulmonary edema due to sudden decompensation in LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction. This decompensation can be caused by precipitating factors such as an acute rise in BP, dietary indiscretion, or myocardial ischemia. Patients can develop cardiac arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, or they can develop symptoms of heart failure insidiously over time.

Myocardial ischemia

Angina, a frequent complication of hypertensive heart disease, is indistinguishable from other causes of myocardial ischemia. Typical symptoms of angina include substernal chest pain lasting less than 15 minutes (vs >20min in infarction). Pain is often described as follows:

A heaviness, pressure, and/or squeezingRadiating to the neck, jaw, upper back, or left armProvoked by emotional or physical exertionRelieved with rest or sublingual nitroglycerin

However, patients may also present with atypical symptoms without chest pain, such as exertional dyspnea or excessive fatigue, commonly referred to as an angina equivalent. Female patients, in particular, are more likely to present atypically.

Patients may present with chronic, stable angina or acute coronary syndrome, including myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation and acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation. Ischemic ECG changes may be found in individuals presenting with hypertensive crisis in whom no significant coronary atherosclerosis is detectable by coronary angiography.

Acute coronary symptoms can be precipitated by a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque; they can also result from an acute and severe rise in BP that leads to a sudden increase in transmural pressure without a change in stability of the plaque.

Cardiac arrhythmias

Irregular or abnormal heart rhythms can cause a variety of symptoms, including the following:

PalpitationsNear or total syncopePrecipitation of anginaSudden cardiac deathPrecipitation of heart failure, especially with atrial fibrillation in diastolic dysfunctionPreviousNextPhysical Examination

Physical signs of hypertensive heart disease depend on the predominant cardiac abnormality and the duration and severity of the hypertensive heart disease. Findings from the physical examination may be entirely normal in the very early stages of the disease, or the patient may have classic signs upon examination.

In addition to generalized findings attributable directly to high BP, the physical examination may reveal clues to a potential etiology of hypertension, such as truncal obesity and striae in Cushing syndrome, renal artery bruit in renal artery stenosis, and abdominal mass in polycystic kidney disease.

Pulses

The arterial pulses are normal in the early stages of hypertensive heart disease. The cardiac rhythm is regular if the patient is in sinus rhythm; it is irregularly irregular if the patient is in atrial fibrillation. The heart rate is as follows:

Normal in patients in sinus rhythmNot normal in decompensated heart failureTachycardic in patients with heart failure and in patients with atrial fibrillation and a rapid ventricular response

The pulse volume is usually normal, but it is decreased in patients with LV dysfunction. Additional findings may include radial-femoral delay if the etiology of hypertension is coarctation of the aorta

Blood pressure

Systolic and/or diastolic BP is elevated (>140/90mm Hg). Mean BP and pulse pressure are also elevated generally. The BP in the upper extremities may be higher than that in the lower extremities in patients with coarctation of the aorta. BP may be normal at the time of evaluation if the patient is on adequate antihypertensive medications or if the patient has advanced LV dysfunction and the LV cannot generate enough stroke volume and cardiac output to produce an elevated BP.

Veins

In patients with heart failure, the jugular veins may be distended. The predominant waves depend on the severity of the heart failure and any other associated lesions.

Heart

The apical impulse is sustained and nondisplaced in patients without significant systolic LV dysfunction but with LVH. A presystolic S4 may be felt. Later in the course of disease, when significant systolic LV dysfunction supervenes, the apical impulse is displaced laterally, owing to LV dilatation. In the right ventricle, a lift is present late in the course of heart failure if significant pulmonary hypertension develops.

S1 is normal in intensity and character. S2 at the right upper sternal border is loud because of an accentuated aortic component (A2); it can have a reverse or paradoxical split due either to increased afterload or to associated left bundle-branch block (LBBB). S4 is frequently palpable and audible, implying the presence of a stiffened, noncompliant ventricle due to chronic pressure overload and LVH. S3 is not typically present initially, but it is audible in the presence of heart failure, either systolic or diastolic.

An early decrescendo diastolic murmur of aortic insufficiency may be heard along the mid-parasternal to left parasternal area, especially in the presence of acutely elevated BP, frequently disappearing once the BP is better controlled. In addition, an early systolic to midsystolic murmur of aortic sclerosis is commonly audible. A holosystolic murmur of mitral regurgitation may be present in patients with advanced heart failure and a dilated mitral annulus.

Lungs

Findings upon chest examination may be normal or may include signs of pulmonary congestion, such as rales, decreased breath sounds, and dullness to percussion due to pleural effusion.

Abdomen

The abdominal examination may reveal a renal artery bruit in patients with hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis, a pulsatile expansile mass of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and hepatomegaly and ascites due to CHF.

Extremities

Ankle edema may be present in patients with advanced heart failure.

Central nervous system and ophthalmologic system

Central nervous system (CNS) examination findings are usually unremarkable unless the patient has had previous cerebrovascular accidents with residual deficit. CNS changes may also be seen in patients who present with hypertensive emergency.

Examination of the fundi may reveal evidence of hypertensive retinopathy, the severity of which depends on the duration and severity of the patient's hypertension, or earlier signs of hypertension, such as arteriovenous nicking.

PreviousNextStaging of Hypertension

Although hypertensive heart disease typically is not described in various stages, the disease usually progresses in the following sequence:

Increased wall stress leads to LVHWhich leads to diastolic LV dysfunctionWhich can be followed by systolic LV dysfunction

The risks of ventricular ectopy, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and cardiovascular mortality are increased in patients once LVH develops and are also increased in patients with heart failure. Table 1, below, shows the division of BP and hypertension into stages.

Table 1. Stages of Elevated BP and Hypertension According to The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC7) on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure[12] (Open Table in a new window)

CategorySystolic BP,

mm Hg

Diastolic BP,

mm Hg

OptimalPrehypertension120-13980-89Stage I140-15990-99Stage II>160>100PreviousNextLaboratory Studies

Laboratory studies are helpful in establishing the etiology of hypertension, quantitating the severity of target organ damage, and monitoring the adverse effects of therapy. The tests to be ordered depend on clinical judgment regarding the etiology of hypertension.

Recommendations from the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC7) on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure include carrying out the following baseline laboratory workup before initiating treatment for hypertension[12] :

ElectrocardiogramUrinalysisBlood glucose and hematocrit levelsSerum potassium, creatinine (or the corresponding estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR]), and calcium measurementsLipid profile after a 9- to 12-hour fast - Includes high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides Optional tests - Include measurement of urinary albumin excretion or albumin/creatinine ratioEvaluating the renal system

Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels are elevated in patients with renal failure. Other studies include the above-mentioned urinalysis, GFR, and urinary albumin excretion or albumin/creatinine ratio measurements.

Evaluating the endocrine system

Hypokalemia is found in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism and in patients with secondary hyperaldosteronism, Cushing disease, and Bartter syndrome. Hypokalemia is most useful in leading to further diagnostic studies if the patient has not received diuretics.

Plasma renin activity is generally depressed and serum aldosterone level is elevated in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism. Twenty-four – hour urinary catecholamine and metanephrine levels are elevated in patients with pheochromocytoma.

Elevated 24-hour urinary free cortisol and failure to suppress an early morning serum cortisol level after an overnight dexamethasone suppression test are observed in patients with Cushing disease. Thyrotropin levels may be elevated in patients with hypothyroidism and depressed in patients with hyperthyroidism.

PreviousNextTransthoracic Echocardiography

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) may be very useful for identifying features of hypertensive heart disease. TTE is more sensitive and specific then electrocardiography for diagnosing the presence of LVH (57% for mild and 98% for severe LVH). LVH is symmetrical, whereas the hypertrophy of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is asymmetrical. The definition of the LVH based on echocardiography findings is somewhat controversial in the absence of any criterion standards. (See the images below.)

Two-dimensional echocardiogram (parasternal long aTwo-dimensional echocardiogram (parasternal long axis view) from a 70-year-old woman showing concentric left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial enlargement. Two-dimensional echocardiogram (parasternal short Two-dimensional echocardiogram (parasternal short axis view) from a 70-year-old woman showing concentric left ventricular hypertrophy. M-mode echocardiogram from a 70-year-old woman shoM-mode echocardiogram from a 70-year-old woman showing concentric left ventricular hypertrophy. Two-dimensional echocardiogram (parasternal short Two-dimensional echocardiogram (parasternal short axis view at the aortic valve level) from a 70-year-old woman showing mild aortic sclerosis. Calculating LV mass

On 2-dimensional (2-D) and M-mode examination, the interventricular septum is thickened, as is the posterior wall (>1.1cm). LVH is defined quantitatively as an increase in the LV mass or the LV mass index (LVMI), which is defined as LV mass divided by body surface area. Various formulas have been used to calculate LV mass, each with inherent drawbacks.

The Troy formula was used in the Framingham Heart study. The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)–recommended formula for estimation of LV mass from LV linear dimensions (validated with necropsy) is based on modeling the LV as a prolate ellipse of revolution: LV mass = 0.8 × {1.04[(LVIDd + PWTd + SWTd)3 - (LVIDd)3]} + 0.6g, where LVIDd is the internal dimension of the left ventricle at end diastole, PWTd is posterior wall thickness at end diastole, and SWTd is septal wall thickness at end diastole. This formula is appropriate for evaluating patients without major distortions of LV geometry (eg, patients with hypertension).[13]

In various studies, LVH has been defined either as LV mass greater than 215g or greater than 225g. Because LV mass is affected by height, weight, and body surface area, LVMI more accurately sets the limits for LV mass. Framingham Heart Study data indicated that abnormal LVMI limits are 134g/m2 for men and 110g/m2 for women.

Flow velocity pattern

The transmitral flow velocity pattern, characterized by abnormally prolonged isovolumic relaxation time, a reversed "E:A" ratio (ie, reversed velocity of early diastole to peak flow velocity of atrial contraction), and a prolonged deceleration time, is abnormal. The patient may exhibit a pseudonormal pattern during the transition from the impaired relaxation to the restrictive filling phase.

The tissue Doppler indices are abnormal. The tissue Doppler profile shows a reversed E:A ratio, which is especially helpful in patients who have a pseudonormal pattern on transmitral flow velocity Doppler studies.

Systolic dysfunction

Evidence of LV systolic dysfunction includes a dilated LV, low LV fractional shortening, low LV ejection fraction, and the presence of systolic dysfunction, which is commonly associated with some degree of diastolic dysfunction.

Aortic dilatation

LA dilatation may be demonstrated by evidence of right-sided dilatation (right-sided chambers may be dilated with some degree of pulmonary hypertension) and evidence of valvular abnormalities, such as aortic sclerosis (on 2-D TEE) and aortic and mitral insufficiency (on color flow and Doppler examination).

PreviousNextAdditional Imaging Studies

Chest radiographs may show notching of the undersurface of the ribs from the development of collateral circulation in coarctation of the aorta; cardiomegaly in late stages of the disease, due to LV dilatation; cephalization of pulmonary blood flow, Kerley B lines, and alveolar infiltrates in the presence of elevated LV end-diastolic pressure and pulmonary congestion; and blunting of the costophrenic angle in the presence of pleural effusion.

Computed tomography (CT) scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart, although not used routinely, have been shown in experimental studies to quantify LVH. CT scanning, MRI, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the abdomen and chest show the presence of adrenal masses, renal artery stenosis, or evidence of coarctation of aorta. Nuclear imaging may be useful in screening for the presence of coronary artery disease.

PreviousNextElectrocardiography

A 12-lead ECG may show a variety of abnormalities. For example, ischemic ECG changes may be found in individuals presenting with hypertensive crisis in whom no significant coronary atherosclerosis is detectable by coronary angiography. Evidence of LA enlargement includes broad P waves in the limb leads and a prominent and wide, delayed negative deflection in V1. (See the images below.)

Electrocardiogram from a 47-year-old man with a loElectrocardiogram from a 47-year-old man with a long-standing history of uncontrolled hypertension showing left atrial enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy. Electrocardiogram from a 46-year-old man with longElectrocardiogram from a 46-year-old man with long-standing hypertension showing left atrial abnormality and left ventricular hypertrophy with strain.

In one series, among patients with left anterior fascicular block on ECG, 50% had hypertension. As many as 70-80% of patients with LBBB have hypertension.

LVH criteria

Various criteria, differing in sensitivity and specificity, have been used to diagnose LVH. Note that the specificities and sensitivities of the different approaches are far less than those of echocardiography. The frequency of LVH on ECG at the time of initial diagnosis varies from 10% to 100%; in one trial, for example, the frequency was 13%. The sensitivity of ECG for diagnosing LVH is limited, approximately 30-57% in patients with severe LVH.

The Cornell criteria (most sensitive) are (1) R wave in aVL plus an S wave in V3 of greater than 2.8 mV in men and greater than 2mV in women. The Cornell and Cornell voltage duration (Cornell voltage multiplied by QRS duration) criteria have a sensitivity as high as 95% and a specificity as high as 50-60%. A Cornell voltage duration of greater than 2440mV/ms-1 particularly identifies the highest-risk patients.

The Sokolow-Lyon criteria are an S wave in V1 plus an R wave in V5 or V6 of greater than 3.5mV or an R wave in V5 or V6 of greater than 2.6mV. The sensitivity of these criteria is 25%, with a specificity of close to 95%. The Gubner-Ungerleider criteria are an R wave in I plus an S wave in III of greater than 2.5mV. Another set of LVH criteria, the Romhilt-Estes criteria, are summarized in Table 2, below.

Table 2. Romhilt-Estes Criteria (A Point Score System*) (Open Table in a new window)

Voltage CriteriaPointsR wave or S wave in any limb lead >0.2mV or S wave in lead V1 or V2 or R wave in V5 or V6 >0.3mV3LV strain (ST and T waves in direction opposite to QRS direction) without digitalis3LV strain (ST and T waves in direction opposite to QRS direction) with digitalis1LA enlargement (terminal negativity of P waves in V1 >0.1mV deep and 0.04 seconds wide)3Left-axis deviation greater than -30°2QRS duration greater than 0.09 seconds1Intrinsicoid deflection in V5 or V6 >0.05 seconds1* Probable LVH is 4 points; definite LVH is 5 points. The sensitivity of these criteria is 50%, with a specificity of close to 95%. PreviousNextOther StudiesHistology

Gross findings

LVH (concentric) occurs without dilatation of the LV (see the image below). The ratio of wall thickness to the radius of the ventricular chamber increases. LV wall thickness may exceed 2cm, and the heart weight exceeds 500g. Dilatation of the ventricular chamber, thinning of the walls, and enlargement of the external dimensions of the heart occur with the onset of decompensation.

Gross specimen of the heart with concentric left vGross specimen of the heart with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy.

Microscopic findings

The earliest changes in hypertensive heart disease include myocyte enlargement, with an increase in the myocytes' transverse diameters. At a more advanced stage, cellular and nuclear enlargement (with variation in cell size), loss of myofibrils, and interstitial fibrosis occur. (See the images below.)

Histologic section of the myocardium showing a croHistologic section of the myocardium showing a cross-section of coronary artery affected by atherosclerosis and myocyte hypertrophy. Histologic section of the heart showing the hypertHistologic section of the heart showing the hypertrophied myocytes and fibrosis accompanying left ventricular hypertrophy. Histologic section of an autopsy myocardial specimHistologic section of an autopsy myocardial specimen from a patient with long-standing hypertension and associated coronary artery disease. The slide shows myocardial hypertrophy, contraction bands (typical of left ventricular hypertrophy), and "car box" nuclei. Cardiac catheterization

Cardiac catheterization is used for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and helps to assess the severity of elevated pulmonary artery pressure in patients with heart failure.

Sleep evaluation

Sleep evaluation and additional tests for excluding other secondary causes of hypertension may be indicated.

PreviousNextBlood Pressure Goals and Consultations

The medical care of patients with hypertensive heart disease falls under 2 categories—treatment of the elevated BP and prevention and treatment of hypertensive heart disease. According to JNC 7, BP goals should be as follows[12] :

Less than 140/90mm Hg in patients with uncomplicated hypertensionLess than 130/85mm Hg in patients with diabetes and those with renal disease with less than 1g/24-hour proteinuriaLess than 125/75mm Hg in patients with renal disease and more than 1 g/24-hour proteinuriaConsultations

The care and management of patients with hypertensive heart disease include consultations with the following clinicians:

Preventive cardiologistHypertension specialistHeart failure specialistHeart failure nurseElectrophysiologist - For treatment of complex arrhythmiasSleep specialist - If sleep apnea is suspectedPreviousNextLifestyle Modifications

Emerging data support a target BP goal of less than 150/80mm Hg in patients older than 80 years as a means of reducing the risk of congestive heart failure by 64%.[14] Various treatment strategies include the following:

Dietary modificationsRegular aerobic exerciseWeight loss[15] Pharmacotherapy directed toward hypertension, heart failure secondary to diastolic and systolic LV dysfunction, coronary artery disease, and arrhythmias Dietary modifications

Studies have shown that diet and a healthy lifestyle alone or in combination with medical treatment can lower BP and decrease the symptoms of heart failure, as well as reverse LVH. A heart-healthy diet is part of the secondary prophylaxis in patients with coronary artery disease and of the primary prophylaxis in patients at high risk for this disease. Specific dietary recommendations include a diet low in sodium, high in potassium (in patients with normal renal function), rich in fresh fruits and vegetables, low in cholesterol, and low in alcohol consumption.[16, 17, 18]

In a large cohort study of women, the following 6 modifiable lifestyle and dietary factors for lowering the risk of hypertension were identified[19] :

A body mass index (BMI) below 25kg/m2Vigorous exercise for a daily mean period of 30 minutesA high score on the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietModest alcohol intake (up to 10g/day)Nonnarcotic analgesic use less than once weeklyIntake of 400mcg/day or more of supplemental folic acid

A low-sodium diet, alone or in combination with pharmacotherapy, has been shown by numerous studies to reduce BP in patients with hypertension, with a more prominent response in a subset of patients with hypertension—mainly black individuals—with low renin levels. Restriction of sodium in these patients does not lead to compensatory stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system and thus has a potent antihypertensive effect. Data also indicate that sodium reduction, previously shown to lower BP, may also reduce the long-term risk of cardiovascular events. The recommended daily sodium intake is 50-100mmol, equivalent to 3-6g of salt per day, which leads to an average 2-8mm Hg reduction in BP.[20]

In various epidemiologic studies, a high-potassium diet has been associated with lowering of BP. The mechanism of this action is not clear. Intravenous infusion of potassium has been shown to cause vasodilatation, which is believed to be mediated by nitric oxide in the vascular wall. Fresh fruits and vegetables rich in potassium, such as bananas, oranges, avocados, and tomatoes, should be recommended for patients with normal renal function.

The DASH diet has been shown to significantly lower the BP (8-14mm Hg) in patients with hypertension regardless of whether or not they maintain a constant sodium content in their diet. The DASH diet is not only rich in important nutrients and fiber but also includes foods that contain far more potassium, calcium, and magnesium than are found in the average American diet. This diet should be advised in patients with hypertension.[21, 22, 23, 24, 25]

Heavy alcohol consumption has been associated with high BP and an increase in LV mass.[26] Moderation in alcohol consumption is advised; no more than 1-2 drinks daily is recommended.[27]

Sinha et al concluded that high intakes of red or processed meat were associated with modest increases in total mortality, cancer mortality, and cardiovascular disease mortality.[28] The baseline population was a cohort of one-half million people aged 50-71 years from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP (formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study.[28]

Exercise

Regular dynamic isotonic (aerobic) exercise, such as walking, running, swimming, or cycling, has been shown to decrease BP and improve cardiovascular well-being.[29] It also has additional favorable cardiovascular effects, including improved endothelial function, peripheral vasodilatation, reduced resting heart rate, improved heart rate variability, and reduced plasma levels of catecholamines.

Regular aerobic exercise sessions of at least 30 minutes for most days of the week can produce an average reduction in BP of 4-9mm Hg. Isometric and strenuous exercise should be avoided.

Weight reduction

Studies have shown that weight reduction is one of the most effective ways to reduce BP. A 5-20mm Hg BP reduction occurs with each 10kg of weight loss.[30] Gradual weight reduction (1kg weekly) should be advised. Pharmacologic interventions to reduce weight should be used with great caution, because diet pills, especially those available over the counter, frequently contain sympathomimetics. These agents can raise BP, worsen angina or symptoms of heart failure, and exacerbate tendencies for cardiac arrhythmias. Medications that should be avoided include nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), sympathomimetics, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), as these agents can elevate BP or interfere with antihypertensive therapy.

PreviousNextPharmacotherapy

The treatment of hypertension and hypertensive heart disease can involve the following classes of antihypertensive medications:

Thiazide diureticsBeta blockers and combined alpha and beta blockersCalcium channel blockersAngiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitorsAngiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs)Direct vasodilators - Such as hydralazine

Most patients require 2 or more antihypertensive drugs to achieve the BP goal; when the BP is more than 20/10mm Hg above the goal, consideration should be given to initiating therapy with 2 drugs, either as separate prescriptions or in fixed-dose combinations. (Surgical treatment may be necessary for definitive treatment in selected cases of secondary causes of hypertension, such as aortic coarctation or pheochromocytoma.)

Thiazide-type diuretics

Thiazide-type diuretics should be used for most patients with uncomplicated hypertension, either alone or in combination with drugs from other classes, according to the JNC.[12] Updated recommendations from the JNC (JNC-8) are expected in 2012 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc8/index.htm).

Calcium channel blockers

Calcium channel blockers are effective for systolic hypertension in elderly patients. In one study, an ACE inhibitor/dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker combination proved to be superior to the ACE inhibitor/thiazide diuretic combination in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension who were at high risk for such events.[31]

ACE inhibitors and ARBs

ACE inhibitors are the first choice in patients with diabetes and/or ventricular dysfunction. ARBs are a reasonable alternative, especially for patients who suffer adverse effects from ACE inhibitors.

Beta blockers

Beta blockers are the drugs of first choice in patients with heart failure due to systolic LV dysfunction, patients with ischemic heart disease with or without a history of myocardial infarction, and patients with thyrotoxicosis.

Alpha channel blockers

Avoid peripheral alpha channel blockers in patients with hypertension in view of findings that they have an adverse effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates. Central alpha antagonists have no evidence-based support and have more adverse effects.

Other agents

Intravenous drugs used in patients with a hypertensive emergency include nitroprusside, labetalol, hydralazine, enalapril, and beta blockers (avoided in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure).

Some evidence shows that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist ameliorates oxidative stress and leads to reversal of systemic hypertension-associated cardiac remodeling in chronic pressure overload myocardium and LVH.[32]

Current guidelines indicate the use of acetaminophen as a first-line analgesic in patients with coronary artery disease. However, a study demonstrated that acetaminophen induced a significant increase in ambulatory BP in these patients.[33]

PreviousNextTreatment of LV Dysfunction and ArrhythmiasTreatment of left ventricular hypertrophy

LVH, a marker of increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, should be treated aggressively because patients with LVH represent the subgroup of patients at the highest risk for cardiovascular events and mortality. Whether regression in LVH leads to improvement in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rates is not clear, although limited data support this hypothesis. Data also indicate that regression of electrocardiographic LVH is associated with less hospitalization for heart failure in hypertensive patients.[32]

Medications for the treatment of hypertension have been shown to reduce LVH. Limited meta-analysis data suggest a slight advantage to ACE inhibitors.

Treatment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction

Certain classes of antihypertensives—ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers—have been shown (although not consistently) to improve echocardiographic parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction and the symptomatology of heart failure. Candesartan, an ARB, has been shown to decrease hospitalization in patients with diastolic heart failure.[34]

Use diuretics and nitrates with caution in patients with heart failure due to diastolic dysfunction. These drugs may cause severe hypotension by inappropriately decreasing the preload, which is required for adequate LV filling pressures. If diuretics are indicated, delicate titration is necessary. Hydralazine has been shown to cause severe hypotension in patients with heart failure due to diastolic dysfunction.

By increasing the intracellular calcium level, digoxin can worsen LV stiffness. However, a large, randomized trial has not shown any increase in mortality rate.

Treatment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Diuretics (predominantly loop diuretics) are used in the treatment of LV systolic dysfunction. Low-dose spironolactone has been shown to decrease the rates of morbidity and mortality in patients in NYHA class III or IV heart failure who are already taking ACE inhibitors. This agent is also recommended for use in post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus or who have an LV ejection fraction of less than 40%.[35]

ACE inhibitors are used for preload and afterload reduction and the prevention of pulmonary or systemic congestion. These drugs have been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality rates in patients with heart failure due to systolic dysfunction. The aim should be to use the target dose or the maximum tolerable doses. ACE inhibitors are also indicated in patients with asymptomatic LV dilatation and dysfunction.

Beta blockers (cardioselective or mixed alpha and beta), such as carvedilol, metoprolol XL, and bisoprolol, have been shown to improve LV function and decrease rates of mortality and morbidity from heart failure. Trials have also shown improvement in outcomes for patients in NYHA class IV heart failure with carvedilol administration. These drugs should be started when the patient has no signs of fluid overload and is in compensated heart failure. Therapy should be initiated with low doses, increasing the dose of the beta blocker very slowly and closely monitoring the patient for signs of worsening heart failure.

Treatment of cardiac arrhythmias

The treatment of these conditions depends upon the specific arrhythmia and the underlying LV function, Anticoagulation should be considered in patients with atrial fibrillation. In addition, treat anxiety, stress, sleep apnea, and other contributing or precipitating factors.

PreviousNextTreatment-Resistant Hypertension

The Symplicity HTN-2 trial assessed the effectiveness and safety of catheter-based renal denervation to reduce BP in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. The findings suggested that this approach can safely reduce hypertension in these patients.[36] In addition, some data suggest that baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) using an implantable stimulator can potentially reduce systolic BP safely over the long term in patients with resistant hypertension.[37]

PreviousNextPrognosis

Mortality and morbidity rates from hypertensive heart disease are higher than those of the general population and depend on the specific cardiac pathology.[1] Data suggest that increases in mortality and morbidity rates are related more to the pulse pressure than to the absolute systolic or diastolic BP levels, but all are important.

Left ventricular hypertrophy

The development of LVH is clearly related to an increase in the cardiovascular mortality rate. In fact, studies have shown an increase in the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with LVH.[38]

The increased risk of cardiovascular events with LVH depends on its type. Concentric LVH poses the greatest risk of such events, as much as a 30% risk over a 10-year period in one study, compared with a 15% risk with eccentric remodeling and a 9% risk without any LVH. The degree of LVH, as assessed by LV mass index (LVMI), is also related to the cardiovascular mortality rate, with a relative risk of 1.73 for men and 2.12 for women for each 50g/m2 increase in the LVMI over a 4-year period. With LVH, the relative risk of mortality is increased 2-fold in patients with coronary artery disease and 4-fold in patients without coronary artery disease.[39]

Although not proven, limited data suggest a reduction in LVH results in a reduction in cardiovascular events. Regression of the LVMI has been demonstrated with several different antihypertensive medications.

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction

The prognosis of patients with diastolic dysfunction is poor and is affected by the presence of underlying coronary artery disease. In one study, survival rates at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years in patients with heart failure due to diastolic dysfunction were 86%, 76%, and 46%, respectively. In another study, the 7-year cardiovascular mortality rate approached 50% in patients with heart failure due to diastolic dysfunction and concomitant coronary artery disease; some also had hypertension.

Even in patients with asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction due to hypertension, the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events is significantly increased, particularly with an increase in the pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP). LV diastolic dysfunction and the heart failure symptoms associated with it have been shown to improve with treatment aimed at lowering BP and reducing LVH. Whether such treatment has any effect on the mortality rate is not clear.

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction

The mortality rate from heart failure due to systolic LV dysfunction is high and depends on the symptoms and NYHA heart failure classification. The 5-year mortality rate for patients with heart failure due to systolic dysfunction approaches 20%, whereas the 2-year mortality rate in patients with NYHA class IV classification is as high as 50%. Mortality rates have decreased with the use of ACE inhibitors and beta blockers, which improve LV function.

PreviousNextLong-Term Monitoring

The long-term follow-up of patients with hypertensive heart disease includes monitoring of several factors. For example, patients with heart failure require daily measurement of weight and evaluation of accurate fluid balance. Furthermore, the effectiveness and choice of antihypertensive treatment, medication effectiveness and compliance, the presence or absence of coronary artery disease and degree of LV systolic function, and the patient's dietary habits and exercise pattern require assessment. In addition, it is important to reinforce dietary advice and advice regarding the importance of regular exercise.

Workup for secondary causes of hypertension should be performed if not already done. In addition, screen for complications related to hypertension, such as cerebrovascular disease, hypertensive retinopathy, worsening heart failure, and renal failure, and assess for LVH by electrocardiography or echocardiography.

When evaluating the adverse effects of various medications, obtain a urinalysis and BUN result, creatinine level, and electrolyte levels to rule out renal insufficiency and electrolyte imbalances secondary to medications and to quantitate proteinuria. A study by Leung et al found a 30% incidence of hyponatremia (Na [40]

In addition, advise the patient to avoid taking over-the-counter medications, such as commonly used NSAIDs, cough suppressants, and decongestants containing sympathomimetics, which can potentially raise BP.

Previous, Hypertensive Heart Disease