Showing posts with label Syndrome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Syndrome. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Practice Essentials

Brugada syndrome is a disorder characterized by sudden death associated with one of several ECG patterns characterized by incomplete right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevations in the anterior precordial leads.

Essential update: Predicting prognosis in Brugada syndrome with J-wave characteristics

In patients with Brugada syndrome, the presence of a J wave in multiple leads and horizontal ST-segment morphology after J wave are associated with a higher incidence of cardiac events, according to a recent study of 460 patients with Brugada syndrome.[1] Important predictors of cardiac events included symptoms, QRS duration in lead V2 longer than 90 ms, and inferolateral J wave and/or horizontal ST-segment morphology after J wave.[1]

Signs and symptoms

Signs and symptoms in patients with Brugada syndrome may include the following:

Syncope and cardiac arrest: Most common clinical manifestations; in many cases, cardiac arrest occurs during sleep or restNightmares or thrashing at nightAsymptomatic, but routine ECG shows ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V3Associated atrial fibrillation (20%)[2] Fever: Often reported to trigger or exacerbate clinical manifestations

The lack of a prodrome has been reported to be more common in patients with ventricular fibrillation documented as the cause of syncope in patients with Brugada syndrome.[3]

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Most patients with Brugada syndrome have a normal physical examination. However, such an examination is necessary to exclude other potential cardiac causes of syncope or cardiac arrest in an otherwise healthy patient (eg, heart murmurs from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or from a valvular or septal defect).

Testing

In patients with suspected Brugada syndrome, consider the following studies:

12-lead ECG in all patients with syncopeDrug challenge with a sodium channel blocker in patients with syncope without an obvious causeElectrophysiologic study to determine the inducibility of arrhythmias for risk stratification

Laboratory tests that may aid in the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome include the following:

Serum potassium and calcium levels: In patients presenting with ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leadsPotassium and calcium levels: ECG patterns in patients with hypercalcemia and hyperkalemia similar to that of Brugada syndromeCK-MB and troponin levels: In patients with symptoms compatible with an acute coronary syndromeGenetic testing for a mutation in SCN5A

Further testing may be indicated to exclude other diagnostic possibilities.

Imaging studies

Perform echocardiography and/or MRI, primarily to exclude arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, as well as to assess for other potential causes of arrhythmias.

See Workup for more detail.

Management

To date, the only treatment that has proven effective in treating ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation and preventing sudden death in patients with Brugada syndrome is implantation of an automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD).

No pharmacologic therapy has been proven to reduce the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias or sudden death; however, theoretically, drugs that counteract the ionic current imbalance in Brugada syndrome could be used to treat it. For example, quinidine, which blocks the calcium-independent transient outward potassium current (Ito), has been shown to normalize the ECG pattern in patients with Brugada syndrome.[4] However, quinidine also blocks sodium (Na) currents, which could have contrary effects.

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image librarySchematics show the 3 types of action potentials iSchematics show the 3 types of action potentials in the right ventricle: endocardial (End), mid myocardial (M), and epicardial (Epi). A, Normal situation on V2 ECG generated by transmural voltage gradients during the depolarization and repolarization phases of the action potential. B-E, Different alterations of the epicardial action potential that produce the ECG changes observed in patients with Brugada syndrome. Adapted from Antzelevitch, 2005. NextBackground

Brugada syndrome is a disorder characterized by sudden death associated with one of several electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns characterized by incomplete right bundle-branch block and ST elevations in the anterior precordial leads. See the image below.

Three types of ST-segment elevation in Brugada synThree types of ST-segment elevation in Brugada syndrome, as shown in the precordial leads on ECG in the same patient at different times. Left panel shows a type 1 ECG pattern with pronounced elevation of the J point (arrow), a coved-type ST segment, and an inverted T wave in V1 and V2. The middle panel illustrates a type 2 pattern with a saddleback ST-segment elevated by >1 mm. The right panel shows a type 3 pattern in which the ST segment is elevated < 1 mm. According to a consensus report (Antzelevitch, 2005), the type 1 ECG pattern is diagnostic of Brugada syndrome. Modified from Wilde, 2002.

In the initial description of Brugada syndrome, the heart was reported to be structurally normal, but this concept has been challenged.[5] Subtle structural abnormalities in the right ventricular outflow tract have been reported.

Brugada syndrome is genetically determined and has an autosomal dominant pattern of transmission in about 50% of familial cases (see Etiology). The typical patient with Brugada syndrome is young, male, and otherwise healthy, with normal general medical and cardiovascular physical examinations.

Patients with Brugada syndrome are prone to develop ventricular tachyarrhythmias that may lead to syncope, cardiac arrest, or sudden cardiac death.[6, 7, 8] Infrahisian conduction delay and atrial fibrillation may also be manifestations of the syndrome.[9, 10]

About 5% of survivors of cardiac arrest have no clinically identified cardiac abnormality. About half of these cases are thought to be due to Brugada syndrome.[11]

At present, implantation of an automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) is the only treatment proven effective in treating ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation and preventing sudden death in patients with Brugada syndrome (see Treatment).

PreviousNextPathophysiology

Brugada syndrome is an example of a channelopathy, a disease caused by an alteration in the transmembrane ion currents that together constitute the cardiac action potential. Specifically, in 10-30% of cases, mutations in the SCN5A gene, which encodes the cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel Nav 1.5, have been found. These loss-of-function mutations reduce the sodium current (INa) available during the phases 0 (upstroke) and 1 (early repolarization) of the cardiac action potential.

This decrease in INa is thought to affect the right ventricular endocardium differently from the epicardium. Thus, it underlies both the Brugada ECG pattern and the clinical manifestations of the Brugada syndrome.

The exact mechanisms underlying the ECG alterations and arrhythmogenesis in Brugada syndrome are disputed.[12] The repolarization-defect theory is based on the fact that right ventricular epicardial cells display a more prominent notch in the action potential than endocardial cells. This is thought to be due to an increased contribution of the transient outward current (Ito) to the action potential waveform in that tissue.

A decrease in INa accentuates this difference, causing a voltage gradient during repolarization and the characteristic ST elevations on ECG. Research has provided human evidence for a repolarization gradient in patients with Brugada syndrome using simultaneous endocardial and epicardial unipolar recordings.[13] See the image below.

Schematics show the 3 types of action potentials iSchematics show the 3 types of action potentials in the right ventricle: endocardial (End), mid myocardial (M), and epicardial (Epi). A, Normal situation on V2 ECG generated by transmural voltage gradients during the depolarization and repolarization phases of the action potential. B-E, Different alterations of the epicardial action potential that produce the ECG changes observed in patients with Brugada syndrome. Adapted from Antzelevitch, 2005.

When the usual relative durations of repolarization are not altered, the T wave remains upright, causing a saddleback ECG pattern (type 2 or 3). When the alteration in repolarization is sufficient to cause a reversal of the normal gradient of repolarization, the T wave inverts, and the coved (type 1) ECG pattern is seen. In a similar way, a heterogeneous alteration in cardiac repolarization may predispose to the development of reentrant arrhythmias, termed phase 2 reentry, that can clinically cause ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.[14]

An alternative hypothesis, the depolarization/conduction disorder model, proposes that the typical Brugada ECG findings can be explained by slow conduction and activation delays in the right ventricle (in particular in the right ventricular outflow tract).[12]

One study used ajmaline provocation to elicit a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in 91 patients, and found that the repolarization abnormalities were concordant with the depolarization abnormalities and appeared to be secondary to the depolarization changes.[15] Using vectorcardiograms and body surface potential maps, investigators were able to show that depolarization abnormalities and conduction delay mapped to the right ventricle.

PreviousNextEtiology

The prototypical case of Brugada syndrome has been associated with alterations in the SCN5A gene, of which nearly 300 mutations have been described.[16] Mutations in other genes have been proposed to cause a variant of Brugada syndrome, including the genes coding for alpha1- and beta2b-subunits of the L-type calcium channel (CACNA1C and CACNB2), which are thought to cause a syndrome of precordial ST elevation, sudden death, and short QT interval.[17]

Mutations in the genes GPD1-L[18] and SCN1B[19] have been identified in a few familial cases. Cases in which a mutation in the SCN5A gene cannot be demonstrated may be due to mutations of these genes, due to other unidentified genes, or located in regions of the coding sequence or promoter region of SCN5A that are not routinely sequenced in lab tests.

Many clinical situations have been reported to unmask or exacerbate the ECG pattern of Brugada syndrome. Examples are a febrile state, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, alcohol or cocaine intoxication, and the use of certain medications, including sodium channel blockers, vagotonic agents, alpha-adrenergic agonists, beta-adrenergic blockers, heterocyclic antidepressants, and a combination of glucose and insulin.[14]

PreviousNextEpidemiologyUnited States statistics

Because of its recent identification, the prevalence of Brugada syndrome is not well established. In a large university hospital on the West Coast of the United States, the prevalence of a Brugada ECG pattern among unselected, mainly white and Hispanic adults was 2 of 1348 patients (0.14%); in both cases, the ECG patterns were type 2.[20] The prevalence in Asian and other ethnic populations may be higher.

International statistics

In parts of Asia (eg, the Philippines, Thailand, Japan), Brugada syndrome seems to be the most common cause of natural death in men younger than 50 years. It is known as Lai Tai (Thailand), Bangungot (Philippines), and Pokkuri (Japan). In Northeast Thailand, the mortality rate from Lai Tai is approximately 30 cases per 100,000 population per year.[21]

Race-, sex-, and age-related demographics

Brugada syndrome is most common in people from Asia. The reason for this observation is not yet fully understood but may be due to an Asian-specific sequence in the promoter region of SCN5A.[22]

Brugada syndrome is 8-10 times more prevalent in men than in women, although the probability of having a mutated gene does not differ by sex. The penetrance of the mutation therefore appears to be much higher in men than in women.

Brugada syndrome most commonly affects otherwise healthy men aged 30-50 years, but affected patients aged 0-84 years have been reported. The mean age of patients who die suddenly is 41 years.[14]

PreviousNextPrognosis

Brugada syndrome is a cause of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, which may degenerate into ventricular fibrillation and cause cardiac arrest. Prolonged hypoxia during cardiac arrest may leave patients with neurologic sequelae. Implantable cardioverters-defibrillators (ICDs) are often used to treat patients with Brugada syndrome, exposing them to complications related to device implantation and the potential for inappropriate shocks.

During a mean follow-up of 24 months, sudden cardiac death or ventricular fibrillation occurred in 8.2% of patients with Brugada syndrome. A history of syncope, a spontaneously abnormal ECG, and inducibility during programmed electrical stimulation (by one study) significantly increased this risk.[7]

Brugada syndrome may be a significant cause of death, aside from accidents, in men under 40. The true incidence is not known due to reporting biases. Although there is a strong population dependence, an estimated 4% of all sudden deaths and at least 20% of sudden deaths in patients with structurally normal hearts are due to the syndrome. Those with the syndrome have a mean age of sudden death of 41 ±15 years.[23]

PreviousNextPatient Education

Educating the patient and his or her family members and coworkers about basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important. Genetic counseling is reasonable if desired by the patient and family.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Brugada Syndrome

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Practice Essentials

Long QT syndrome is a congenital disorder characterized by a prolongation of the QT interval on electrocardiograms and a propensity to ventricular tachyarrhythmias, which may lead to syncope, cardiac arrest, or sudden death.

Essential update: Single vs multiple mutations in long QT syndrome and risk for life-threatening cardiac events

In a recent analysis of 403 patients from the LQTS Registry, investigators found that 57 patients with multiple mutations (≥2 mutations in ≥1 LQTS-susceptibility gene) were at greater risk for life-threatening cardiac events—aborted cardiac arrest, implantable defibrillator shock, or sudden cardiac death—than patients with a single mutation.[1] This finding was borne out in multivariate analyses: Patients with multiple mutations had a 2.3-fold increased risk for life-threatening cardiac events compared with those with a single mutation. Moreover, multiple mutations in a single LQTS gene were associated with a 3.2-fold increased risk, whereas the risk in patients with multiple mutations involving more than 1 LQTS gene did not significantly differ from that seen in patients with a single mutation.[1]

Signs and symptoms

Long QT syndrome is usually diagnosed after a person has a cardiac event (eg, syncope, cardiac arrest). In some situations, this condition is diagnosed after a family member suddenly dies. In some individuals, the diagnosis is made when an electrocardiogram shows QT prolongation.

A history of cardiac events is the most typical clinical presentation in patients with LQTS.

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Findings on physical examination usually do not indicate a diagnosis of long QT syndrome, although some patients may present with excessive bradycardia for their age, and some patients may have hearing loss (congenital deafness), indicating the possibility of Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome. Skeletal abnormalities, such as short stature and scoliosis are seen in the LQT7 type (Andersen syndrome), and congenital heart diseases, cognitive and behavioral problems, musculoskeletal diseases, and immune dysfunction may be seen in those with LQT8 type (Timothy syndrome).

Testing

Diagnostic studies in patients with suspected long QT syndrome include the following:

Serum potassium and magnesium levelsThyroid function testsElectrocardiography of the patient and family membersPharmacologic provocation with epinephrine or isoproterenol in patients with a borderline presentationGenetic testing of the patient and family members

An increased QTc interval in response to standing up (“response to standing” test), which is associated with increased sympathetic tone, can provide more diagnostic information in patients with long QT syndrome.[2] This increase in QTc in response to standing may persist in these patients even after heart rate returns to normal.[3]

See Workup for more detail.

Management

No treatment addresses the cause of long QT syndrome. Antiadrenergic therapeutic measures (eg, use of beta-blockers, left cervicothoracic stellectomy) and device therapy (eg, use of pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) aim to decrease the risk and lethality of cardiac events.

Pharmacotherapy

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents are the drugs of choice to treat long QT syndrome and include the following medications:

PropranololNadololMetoprololAtenolol

Surgical option

Surgical intervention in patients with long QT syndrome may include the following procedures:

Implantation of cardioverter-defibrillatorsPlacement of a pacemakerLeft cervicothoracic stellectomy

Nonpharmacotherapy

Patients with long QT syndrome should avoid participation in competitive sports, strenuous exercise, and stress-related emotions.

These individuals should also avoid the following agents:

Anesthetics or asthma medication (eg, epinephrine)Antihistamines (eg, diphenhydramine; terfenadine and astemizole [both recalled from US market])Antibiotics (eg, erythromycin, trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, pentamidine)Cardiac medications (eg, quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, sotalol, probucol, bepridil, dofetilide, ibutilide)Gastrointestinal medications (eg, cisapride)Antifungal medications (eg, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole)Psychotropic medications (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, phenothiazine derivatives, butyrophenones, benzisoxazole, diphenylbutylpiperidine)Potassium-loss medications (eg, indapamide, other diuretics; medications for vomiting/diarrhea)

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image libraryMarked prolongation of QT interval in a 15-year-olMarked prolongation of QT interval in a 15-year-old male adolescent with long QT syndrome (LQTS) (R-R = 1.00 s, QT interval = 0.56 s, QT interval corrected for heart rate [QTc] = 0.56 s). Abnormal morphology of repolarization can be observed in almost every lead (ie, peaked T waves, bowing ST segment). Bradycardia is a common feature in patients with LQTS. NextBackground

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a congenital disorder characterized by a prolongation of the QT interval on electrocardiograms (ECGs) and a propensity to ventricular tachyarrhythmias, which may lead to syncope, cardiac arrest, or sudden death. (See Etiology, Prognosis, Presentation, and Workup.)

The QT interval on the ECG, measured from the beginning of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave, represents the duration of activation and recovery of the ventricular myocardium. A QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) that is longer than 0.44 seconds is generally considered to be abnormal, although a normal QTc can be more prolonged in females (up to 0.46sec). The Bazett formula is the formula most commonly used to calculate the QTc, as follows: QTc = QT/square root of the R-R interval (in seconds). (See Workup.)

To measure the QT interval accurately, the relationship of QT to the R-R interval should be reproducible. This issue is especially important when the heart rate is under 50 beats per minute (bpm) or over 120 bpm and when athletes or children have marked beat-to-beat variability of the R-R interval. In such cases, long recordings and several measurements are required. The longest QT interval is usually observed in the right precordial leads. When marked variation is present in the R-R interval (atrial fibrillation, ectopy), correction of the QT interval is difficult to define precisely. (See Workup.)

PreviousNextEtiology and Pathophysiology

The QT interval represents the duration of activation and recovery of the ventricular myocardium. Prolonged recovery from electrical excitation increases the likelihood of dispersing refractoriness, when some parts of myocardium might be refractory to subsequent depolarization.

From a physiologic standpoint, dispersion occurs with repolarization between 3 layers of the heart, and the repolarization phase tends to be prolonged in the mid myocardium. This is why the T wave is normally wide and the interval from Tpeak to Tend (Tp-e) represents the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR). In long QT syndrome (LQTS), TDR increases and creates a functional substrate for transmural reentry.

LQTS has been recognized as mainly Romano-Ward syndrome (ie, familial occurrence with autosomal dominant inheritance, QT prolongation, and ventricular tachyarrhythmias) or as Jervell and Lang-Nielsen (JLN) syndrome (ie, familial occurrence with autosomal recessive inheritance, congenital deafness, QT prolongation, and ventricular arrhythmias). Two other syndromes are described, namely, Andersen syndrome and Timothy syndrome, although there is some debate on whether they should be included in LQTS.

Torsade de pointes

In LQTS, QT prolongation can lead to polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, or torsade de pointes, which itself may lead to ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death. Torsade de pointes is widely thought to be triggered by reactivation of calcium channels, reactivation of a delayed sodium current, or a decreased outward potassium current that results in early afterdepolarization (EAD), in a condition with enhanced TDR usually associated with a prolonged QT interval. TDR serves as a functional reentry substrate to maintain torsade de pointes.

TDR not only provides a substrate for reentry but also increases the likelihood of EAD, the triggering event for torsade de pointes, by prolonging the time window for calcium channels to remain open. Any additional condition that accelerates the reactivation of calcium channels (eg, increased sympathetic tone) increases the risk of EAD.

Genetics

LQTS is known to be caused by mutations of the genes for cardiac potassium, sodium, or calcium ion channels; at least 10 genes have been identified. Based on this genetic background, 6 types of Romano-Ward syndrome, 1 type of Andersen syndrome and 1 type of Timothy syndrome, and 2 types of JLN syndrome are characterized (see Table 1, below).

LQTS results from mutations of genes encoding for cardiac ion channel proteins, which cause abnormal ion channel kinetics. Shortened opening of the potassium channel in LQT1, LQT2, LQT5, LQT6, JLN1, and JLN2 and delayed closing of a sodium channel in LQT3 overcharges a myocardial cell with positive ions. At least 10 genes have been identified in LQTS.

Table 1. Genetic Background of Inherited Forms of LQTS (Romano-Ward syndrome: LQT1-6, Anderson syndrome: LQT7, Timothy syndrome: LQT8, and Jervell and Lang-Nielsen syndrome: JLN1-2) (Open Table in a new window)

Type of LQTS Chromosomal Locus Mutated Gene Ion Current Affected LQT111p15.5KVLQT1 or KCNQ1 (heterozygotes)Potassium (IKs)LQT27q35-36HERG, KCNH2Potassium (IKr)LQT33p21-24SCN5ASodium (INa)LQT44q25-27ANK2, ANKBSodium, potassium and calciumLQT521q22.1-22.2KCNE1 (heterozygotes)Potassium (IKs)LQT621q22.1-22.2MiRP1, KNCE2Potassium (IKr)LQT7 (Anderson syndrome)17q23.1-q24.2KCNJ2Potassium (IK1)LQT8 (Timothy syndrome)12q13.3CACNA1CCalcium (ICa-Lalpha)LQT93p25.3CAV3Sodium (INa)LQT1011q23.3SCN4BSodium (INa)LQT117q21-q22AKAP9Potassium (IKs)LQT12SNTAISodium (INa)JLN111p15.5KVLQT1 or KCNQ1 (homozygotes)Potassium (IKs)JLN221q22.1-22.2KCNE1 (homozygotes)Potassium (IKs)

LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 account for most cases of LQTS, with estimated prevalences of 45%, 45%, and 7%, respectively. In LQTS, QT prolongation is due to overload of myocardial cells with positively charged ions during ventricular repolarization. In LQT1, LQT2, LQT5, LQT6, and LQT7, potassium ion channels are blocked, they open with a delay, or they are open for a shorter period than they are in normally functioning channels. These changes decrease the potassium outward current and prolong repolarization.

LQT1

The LQT1 gene (KVLQT1 or KCNQ1) encodes for part of the IKs slowly deactivating, delayed rectifier potassium channel. More than 170 mutations (most missense) of this gene have been reported. Their net effect is a decreased outward potassium current. Therefore, the channels remain open longer than usual, with a delay in ventricular repolarization and with QT prolongation.

LQT2

The LQT2 gene (HERG or KCNH2) encodes for part of IKr rapidly activating, rapidly deactivating, delayed rectifier potassium channel. Mutations in this gene cause rapid closure of the potassium channels and decrease the normal rise in IKr. They also result in delayed ventricular repolarization and QT prolongation. About 200 mutations in this gene have been detected.

LQT3

In LQT3, caused by mutations of the SCN5A gene for the sodium channel, a gain-of-function mutation causes persistent inward sodium current in the plateau phase, which contributes to prolonged repolarization. Some loss-of-function mutations in the same gene may lead to different presentations, including Brugada syndrome. More than 50 mutations have been identified in this gene.

In some patients, caveolae proteins have been recognized as responsible for the increased Na+ current in LQTS3.[4] Caveolae are small (50-100 nm) microdomains that exist on the membrane of a variety of cells, including cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. Some ion channels, and in particular the SCN5A -encoded voltage-gated Na+ channels, are mainly colocalized with caveolae on the membrane. Thus, absence or abnormal formation of caveolae may have some effects on the availability of Na+ channels. For instance, Vatta and colleagues demonstrated that mutations in caveolin-3 protein exist in LQTS3 and that they can cause an increase in late Na+ current.[4]

Nevertheless, caveolae are present in the membrane of many other cell types and are involved in many cellular activities, thus, their impairment is expected to be associated with multisystemic diseases.

For example, Rajab and colleagues reported genetic mutations resulting in defective caveolae in families with congenital generalized lipodystrophy who have several systemic manifestations, such as hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, impaired bone formations, ventricular arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death.[5] The fact that mutations in proteins associated with ion channels may result in change in the availability of channels on the membrane, and therefore a significant change in total current, has added a new window for investigating the genetic abnormalities resulting in LQTS.

LQT4 gene

The LQT4 gene (ANK2 or ANKB) encodes for the ankyrin-B. Ankyrins are adapter proteins that bind to several ion channel proteins, such as the anion exchanger (chloride-bicarbonate exchanger), sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), the voltage-sensitive sodium channel (INa), the sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX, or INa-Ca), and calcium-release channels (including those mediated by the receptors for inositol triphosphate [IP3] or ryanodine).

Mutations in this gene interfere with several of these ion channels. The end result is increased intracellular concentration of calcium and, sometimes, fatal arrhythmia. Five mutations of this gene are reported. LQT4 is interesting because it provides an example of how mutations in proteins other than ion channels can be involved in the pathogenesis of LQTS.

LQT5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

The LQT5 gene encodes for the IKs potassium channel. Similar to LQT1, LQT5 results in a decreased outward current of potassium and in QT prolongation.

LQT6 involves mutations in the gene MiRP1, or KCNE2, which encodes for the potassium channel beta subunit MinK-related protein 1 (MiRP1). KCNE2 encodes for beta subunits of IKr potassium channels.

The LQT7 gene (KCNJ2) encodes for potassium channel 2 protein that plays an important role in inward repolarizing current (IKi), especially in phase 3 of the action potential. In this subtype, QT prolongation is less prominent than in other types, and the QT interval is sometimes in the normal range. Because potassium channel 2 protein is expressed in cardiac and skeletal muscle, Andersen syndrome is associated with skeletal abnormalities, such as short stature and scoliosis.

Mutations in the LQT8 gene (CACNA1C) cause loss of L-type calcium current. So far, a limited number of cases of Timothy syndrome have been reported. They have been associated with abnormalities such as congenital heart disease, cognitive and behavioral problems, musculoskeletal diseases, and immune dysfunction.

The LQT9 gene encodes for caveolin 3, a caveolae plasma membrane component protein involved in scaffolding proteins. The voltage-gated sodium channel (NaV b3) is associated with this protein. Functional studies have demonstrated that CAV3 mutations are associated with persistent late sodium current and have been reported in cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).[6] LQT9 and LQT4 serve as examples of LQTS with nonchannel mutations.

A novel mutation in the LQTS10 gene encoding the protein NaV b4, a subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel of the heart, NaV 1.5 (gene SCN5), results in a positive shift in the inactivation of the sodium current. To date, only a single mutation in 1 patient has been described.[7]

Alpha-1-syntrophic gene mutation

The newest genetic missense mutation associated with LQTS has been described in the alpha-1-syntrophin gene and results in gain of function of the sodium channel similar to that observed in LQT3.[8]

Stimuli

In patients with LQTS, a variety of adrenergic stimuli, including exercise, emotion, loud noise, and swimming, may precipitate an arrhythmic response. However, it also may occur without such preceding conditions.

Drug-induced QT prolongation

Secondary (drug-induced) QT prolongation may also increase the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (eg, torsade de pointes) and sudden cardiac death. The ionic mechanism is similar to that observed in congenital LQTS; ie, mainly intrinsic blockade of cardiac potassium efflux.

In addition to the medications that potentially can prolong the QT interval, several other factors play a role in this phenomenon. Important risk factors for drug-induced QT prolongation include the following:

Female sexElectrolyte disturbances (hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia)HypothermiaAbnormal thyroid functionStructural heart diseaseBradycardia

Drug-induced QT prolongation also may have a genetic background, consisting of the predisposition of an ion channel to abnormal kinetics caused by gene mutation or polymorphism. However, data are insufficient to claim that all patients with drug-induced QT prolongation have a genetic LQTS-related mechanism. Arizona CERT provides lists of Drugs that Prolong the QT Interval and/or Induce Torsades de Pointes Ventricular Arrhythmia.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyOccurrence in the United States

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) remains an underdiagnosed disorder, especially because at least 10-15% of LQTS gene carriers have a normal QTc duration.

The prevalence of LQTS is difficult to estimate. However, given the currently increasing frequency of diagnosis, LQTS may be expected to occur in 1 in 10,000 individuals.

International occurrence

The occurrence of long QT syndrome internationally is similar to that in the United States.

Sex-related demographics

Newly diagnosed cases of LQTS are more prevalent in female patients (60-70% of cases) than in male patients. The female predominance may be related to the relatively prolonged QTc (as determined by using the Bazett formula) in women compared with men and to a relatively higher mortality rate in young men.

In women, pregnancy is not associated with an increased incidence of cardiac events, whereas the postpartum period is associated with a substantially increased risk of cardiac events, especially in the subset of patients with LQT2. Cardiac events have been highly correlated with menses.

Also, a significantly higher risk of cardiac events (a 3-fold to 8-fold increase, mainly in the form of recurrent episodes of syncope) has been reported in women with LQT2 syndrome during and after the onset of menopause, compared with the reproductive years.[9]

Age-related demographics

Patients with LQTS usually present with cardiac events (eg, syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, sudden death) in childhood, adolescence, or early adulthood. However, LQTS has been identified in adults as late as in the fifth decade of life. The risk of death from LQTS is higher in boys than in girls younger than 10 years; the risk is similar in male and female patients thereafter.

PreviousNextPrognosis

The prognosis for patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS) treated with beta-blockers (and other therapeutic measures, if needed) is good overall. Fortunately, episodes of torsade de pointes are usually self-terminating in patients with LQTS; only about 4-5% of cardiac events are fatal.

Patients at high risk (ie, those with aborted cardiac arrest or recurrent cardiac events despite beta-blocker therapy) have a markedly increased risk of sudden death. Treat these patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICDs); their prognosis after implantation of an ICD is good.

Morbidity and mortality

Mortality, morbidity, and responses to pharmacologic treatment differ in the various types of LQTS. This issue is under investigation.

LQTS may result in syncope and lead to sudden cardiac death, which usually occurs in otherwise healthy young individuals. LQTS is thought to cause about 4000 deaths in the United States each year. The cumulative mortality rate reaches approximately 6% by the age of 40 years.

Although sudden death usually occurs in symptomatic patients, it happens with the first episode of syncope in about 30% of the patients. This occurrence emphasizes the importance of diagnosing LQTS in the presymptomatic period. Depending on the type of mutation present, sudden cardiac death may happen during exercise, emotional stress, at rest, or at sleep. LQT4 is associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Studies have shown an improved response to pharmacologic treatment with a lowered rate of sudden cardiac death in LQT1 and LQT2, compared with LQT3.

Neurologic deficits after aborted cardiac arrest may complicate the clinical course after successful resuscitation.

PreviousNextPatient Education

Educate patients regarding the nature of LQTS and factors that trigger cardiac events. Patients should avoid sudden noises (eg, from an alarm clock), strenuous exercise, water activities, and other arousal factors.

Educate patients and family members about the critical importance of systematic treatment with beta-blockers. Advise family members and the patient's teachers at school to undergo training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

Educate patients and family members about medications that may induce QT prolongation and that should be avoided in patients with LQTS. Arizona CERT provides lists of Drugs that Prolong the Qt Interval and/or Induce Torsades de Pointes Ventricular Arrhythmia.

The Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndromes Foundation (SADS) and Cardiac Arrhythmias Research and Education Foundation (CARE) have support groups for families with LQTS.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Long QT Syndrome

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Background

Cardiac syndrome X (CSX) is typical anginalike chest pain with evidence of myocardial ischemia in the absence of flow-limiting stenosis on coronary angiography. Cannon et al termed this entity, characterized by a decrease in coronary flow reserve without epicardial artery stenosis, microvascular angina.[1] Cardiac syndrome X is a heterogeneous entity, both clinically and pathophysiologically, involving various pathogenic mechanisms.

NextPathophysiology

Many mechanisms have been proposed to result in cardiac syndrome X, including the following:

Endothelial dysfunction (microvascular angina)Myocardial ischemiaInsulin resistanceAbnormal autonomic controlAltered cardiac sensitivityEstrogen deficiencyEndothelial dysfunction

Endothelial dysfunction in cardiac syndrome X appears to be multifactorial and linked to risk factors such as smoking, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and inflammation.[2] Elevated plasma C-reactive protein levels, a marker of inflammation, have been shown to correlate with disease activity and endothelial dysfunction.[3]

Endothelial dysfunction, with reduced bioavailability of endogenous nitric oxide and increased plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1), may explain, at least in part, the abnormal coronary microvasculature in cardiac syndrome X.[4, 5, 6]

Insulin resistance

Several studies support the presence of hyperinsulinemia in many patients with cardiac syndrome X.[7, 8, 9] Additionally, metformin has been shown to improve vascular function and decrease myocardial ischemia in nondiabetic women with chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries.[10]

Abnormal autonomic control

Abnormalities of the autonomic nervous system characterized by adrenergic hyperactivity and baroreceptor dysfunction have been demonstrated by several investigators.[11, 12, 13, 14] In patients with cardiac syndrome X, Camici et al showed improvement of coronary flow reserve by α-adrenergic blockade with doxazosin.[15]

Altered cardiac sensitivity

Multiple studies have suggested that abnormalities in pain perception are the principal abnormality in patients with chest pain and normal findings on coronary angiography. Altered central neural handling of afferent signals may contribute to the abnormal pain perception in these patients.[16]

Estrogen deficiency

Cardiac syndrome X frequently occurs in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women, supporting a pathogenic role for estrogen deficiency.[17] In postmenopausal women with cardiac syndrome X, estrogen replacement therapy improves coronary endothelial function, decreases anginal frequency, and improves exercise-induced angina.[18, 19, 20]

PreviousNextEpidemiology

Approximately 20%-30% of patients undergoing coronary angiography for evaluation of anginalike chest pain may have nonobstructive coronary artery disease.[21, 22]

Cardiac syndrome X is more common in women than in men.[23]

Cardiac syndrome X frequently occurs in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

PreviousNextPrognosis

Patients with angina and normal coronary arteries at angiography, fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of cardiac syndrome X, have an excellent prognosis.[24, 25, 26, 27, 28] However, an increased coronary atherosclerotic burden at 10-year follow-up was specifically observed in a group of women with cardiac syndrome X who also displayed coronary endothelial dysfunction.[29] The Women’s Ischemic Syndrome Evaluation study, the largest and most thoroughly investigated cohort of middle-aged women with cardiac syndrome X, showed that these patients often have atherosclerosis on intravascular coronary ultrasound and face a 2.5% annual rate adverse cardiac events.[30]

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Cardiac Syndrome X

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Background

Eisenmenger syndrome refers to any untreated congenital cardiac defect with intracardiac communication that leads to pulmonary hypertension, reversal of flow, and cyanosis.[1, 2, 3] The previous left-to-right shunt is converted into a right-to-left shunt secondary to elevated pulmonary artery pressures and associated pulmonary vascular disease. (See Etiology, Treatment, and Medication.)

Lesions in Eisenmenger syndrome, such as large septal defects, are characterized by high pulmonary pressure and/or a high pulmonary flow state. Development of the syndrome represents a point at which pulmonary hypertension is irreversible and is an indication that the cardiac lesion is likely inoperable (see the image below). (See Etiology, Workup, and Treatment.)

This radiograph reveals an enlarged right heart anThis radiograph reveals an enlarged right heart and pulmonary artery dilatation in a 24-year-old woman with an unrestricted patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and Eisenmenger syndrome.

Eisenmenger syndrome was initially described in 1897, when Victor Eisenmenger reported on a patient with symptoms of dyspnea and cyanosis from infancy who subsequently developed heart failure and succumbed to massive hemoptysis.[4] An autopsy revealed a large ventricular septal defect (VSD) and an overriding aorta. This was the first description of a link between a large congenital cardiac shunt defect and the development of pulmonary hypertension. (See Presentation and Workup.)

Advances in the medical treatment of patients with severe pulmonary hypertension may improve survival in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome and may potentially reverse the process in selected patients to a point at which they again become candidates for surgical repair. (See Treatment and Medication.)[5]

Pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure of more than 25 mm Hg at rest or more than 30 mm Hg during exercise. The World Health Organization (WHO) has published a classification system of various etiologies of pulmonary hypertension; the most recent updates were in 2003 and 2008.[6, 7] Eisenmenger syndrome is considered part of the group 1 causes of pulmonary hypertension, according to the Venice classification.

Intracardiac communication

An intracardiac communication allows high pulmonary artery pressures to develop and produces right-to-left intracardiac blood flow. Originally described in association with a large VSD, Eisenmenger syndrome can also manifest with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) or, less frequently, with other congenital cardiac anomalies. (See the images below.)

This transesophageal image is from the midesophaguThis transesophageal image is from the midesophagus of a patient with Eisenmenger syndrome secondary to an unrestricted patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). It shows a severely dilated pulmonary artery. PA = pulmonary artery, Asc Ao = ascending aorta. This computed tomography (CT) chest scan shows a lThis computed tomography (CT) chest scan shows a large, unrestricted patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in a 24-year-old woman with Eisenmenger syndrome.

Examples of congenital heart disease subtypes that may cause pulmonary vascular disease and proceed to Eisenmenger syndrome include the following:

Increased pulmonary arterial flow -Atrial septal defect (ASD), systemic arteriovenous fistulae, total anomalous pulmonary venous returnIncreased pulmonary arterial pressure and flow - Large VSD, large PDA, truncus arteriosus, single ventricle with unobstructed pulmonary blood flowElevated pulmonary venous pressure - Mitral stenosis, cor triatriatum, obstructed pulmonary venous returnNextEpidemiology

Eisenmenger syndrome usually develops before puberty but may develop in adolescence and early adulthood.

Patients in underdeveloped countries are more likely to present late with uncorrected congenital cardiac lesions and a markedly elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). They are more likely to be inoperable secondary to Eisenmenger physiology.

PreviousNextEtiology

Eisenmenger syndrome occurs in patients with large, congenital cardiac or surgically created extracardiac left-to-right shunts. These shunts initially cause increased pulmonary blood flow.

If left unchecked, increased pulmonary blood flow and/or elevated pulmonary arterial pressure can result in remodeling of the pulmonary microvasculature, with subsequent obstruction to pulmonary blood flow. This is commonly referred to as pulmonary vascular obstructive disease (PVOD).

According to Ohms law, flow (Q) is inversely related to resistance (R) and is directly proportional to pressure (P), as represented by the equation Q = P/R. Any increase in flow, as is observed in patients with intracardiac defects and initial left-to-right shunts, results in increased pulmonary artery pressures. Additionally, any increase in resistance, as occurs in PVOD, results in a decrease in effective flow at the same pressure.

The progression to Eisenmenger physiology is represented by a spectrum of morphologic changes in the capillary bed that progress from reversible lesions to irreversible ones. Endothelial dysfunction and smooth muscle proliferation result from the changes in flow and pressure, increasing the PVR.[8]

The cellular and molecular mechanisms remain fully uncharacterized, representing pathways of inflammation, cell proliferation, vasoconstriction, and fibrosis.[9] The mechanism of pulmonary hypertension in congenital heart disease may share characteristics with other mechanisms of pulmonary hypertension, but the pathways remain complex.

In 1958, Heath and Edwards proposed a histologic classification to describe the changes in Eisenmenger syndrome.[10] Stages I and II represent disease that is most likely reversible. Stage III disease may still be reversible, but in progressing to stages IV-VI, the disease is thought to become irreversible. Pulmonary biopsies are rarely performed today for this condition.

Natural history

Failure to reduce pulmonary pressures in the first 2 years of life may result in the failure of the normal regression of the intimal smooth muscle. This is followed by the progressive changes described by Heath and Edwards.[10] The condition then advances to irreversible pulmonary hypertension, defined as unresponsiveness to inhalation of 100% oxygen or nitric oxide. This point usually correlates to a PVR of more than 12 Woods units.

Clinically, patients gradually develop the following complications of advanced pulmonary vascular disease:

Dyspnea upon exertionSyncopeChest painStrokeBrain abscessCyanosisCongestive heart failureDysrhythmiaHyperviscosity complicationsPulmonary hemorrhage/hemoptysisEndocarditis

The timeframe for this process depends on the anatomic nature of the lesion and whether conditions, such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), that are known to accelerate the development of PVOD are present.[11] Without intervention, reversal of flow may happen in early childhood or around puberty, and progression of symptoms may lead to death by the second or third decade of life.[12, 13] Interestingly, adult patients with Eisenmenger syndrome may have a better prognosis compared with those with other causes of pulmonary hypertension.[14]

Causes

Causes of Eisenmenger syndrome include the following:

Large, uncorrected cardiac shunt or palliative, surgically created systemic-to-pulmonary shunt for congenital heart diseaseLarge, nonrestrictive VSDNonrestrictive PDAAtrioventricular septal defect, including a large ostium primum ASD without a ventricular componentAortopulmonary windowPalliative, surgically created systemic-to-pulmonary anastomosis for treatment of congenital heart diseasePreviousNextPrognosis

Eisenmenger syndrome is uniformly fatal; however, some patients survive into the sixth decade of life. The usual life expectancy of a patient with Eisenmenger syndrome is 20-50 years if the syndrome is diagnosed promptly and treated with vigilance. The onset of pulmonary hemorrhage is usually the hallmark of a rapid progression of the disease.[15]

The complications of chronic cyanotic heart disease affect multiple organ systems, including the hematologic, skeletal, renal, and neurologic systems, causing significant morbidity and mortality.

The quality of life is poor in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome because exercise tolerance is extremely limited (due to limited oxygen uptake resulting from an inability to increase pulmonary blood flow) and complications are profound. Poor prognosis is predicted by syncope, elevated-right sided pressures, and hypoxemia.

A study by Salehian et al reported that left ventricular dysfunction (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] [16] A simple echocardiographic score relying on right ventricular and right atrial characteristics was found to predict adverse outcomes in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome that is not associated with complex congenital heart disease.[17]

Uncorrected congenital heart disease with development of Eisenmenger complex portends an insidious progression to near complete physical disability.

PreviousNextOccurrence

The frequency of pulmonary hypertension and the subsequent development of reversed shunting vary depending on the specific heart defect and operative intervention. Such variations include the following:

Large, nonrestrictive VSD or PDA - Approximately 50% of infants with one of these defects develop pulmonary hypertension by early childhood VSD or PDA and transposition of the great arteries - Forty percent of patients develop pulmonary hypertension within the first year of life Large secundum ASD - The natural history of a large secundum ASD differs in that the 10% of cases that progress to pulmonary hypertension do so more slowly and usually not until after the third decade of life Persistent truncus arteriosus and unrestricted pulmonary blood flow - All patients develop severe pulmonary hypertension by the second year of life Common atrioventricular canal - Almost all patients develop severe pulmonary hypertension by the second year of lifeSurgically created systemic-to-pulmonary shunt - The frequency of pulmonary hypertension varies depending on size and anatomyBlalock-Taussig anastomosis (subclavian artery to pulmonary artery) - Ten percent of patients develop pulmonary hypertensionWaterston (ascending aorta to pulmonary artery) or Potts (descending aorta to pulmonary artery) shunt - Thirty percent of patients develop pulmonary hypertension. PreviousNextMorbidity

Complications in Eisenmenger syndrome include the following:

Hematologic complications - These include hyperviscosity syndromes related to secondary erythrocytosis and bleeding diathesesNervous system complications – These include brain abscess, transient cerebral ischemia, thrombotic stroke, and intracerebral hemorrhage Hyperbilirubinemia - Increases the risk of gallstonesHyperuricemia - Can cause nephrolithiasis and secondary goutHypertrophic osteoarthropathy - Causes bone pain and tendernessVision loss - Reports document transient vision loss related to peripheral retinal microvascular abnormalitiesCongestive heart failureDysrhythmiaPulmonary infarction and hemorrhageInfective endocarditisSyncope - The systemic vascular bed is prone to vasodilation and subsequent systemic arterial hypotension, which can cause syncope Sudden deathPreviousNextMortality

Patients with Eisenmenger syndrome usually do not survive beyond the second or third decade. Long-term survival depends on the patient’s age at the onset of pulmonary hypertension and the coexistence of additional adverse features, such as Down syndrome. Survival predominantly depends on right ventricular function. The mortality rate in pregnant patients with Eisenmenger syndrome is reported to be approximately 50%, although it may be higher.

The most frequent terminal event in this syndrome is a combination of hypoxemia and arrhythmia in the setting of rapid increases in pulmonary vascular resistance or decreases in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Death also commonly results from congestive heart failure, massive hemoptysis, or thromboembolism.[12]

PreviousNextPatient Education

The following points should be considered in patient education:

Inform patients that diet and weight control are essentialEducate patients to avoid smokingProvide an exercise prescriptionAdvise abstinence from or only moderate intake of alcoholEducate patients about contraception options and pregnancy risk (the mortality rate in pregnant patients with Eisenmenger syndrome is approximately 50%)[18] Contraception by means of tubal ligation (with subacute bacterial endocarditis [SBE] prophylaxis) may be recommendedOral or implantable contraceptives may promote pulmonary infarction through activation of the coagulation cascadeEducate patients about the signs and symptoms of polycythemia and hyperviscosityInform patients about the importance of dental hygiene

Additional resources for patients with pulmonary hypertension can be found at the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Web site.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Eisenmenger Syndrome

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Background

Holt-Oram syndrome, also called heart-hand syndrome, is an inherited disorder characterized by abnormalities of the upper limbs and heart. Holt and Oram first described this condition in 1960 in a 4-generation family with atrial septal defects and thumb abnormalities.[1]

NextPathophysiology

The syndrome is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait that is completely penetrant. The disease is due to mutations in the transcription factor TBX5, which is important in the development of both the heart and upper limbs. The pathophysiologic sequelae are a direct result of malformations of the heart and upper limbs. No contributory environmental factors are known.[2]

Upper limb involvement

Although the clinical manifestations are variable, upper limb abnormalities are always present. Abnormalities may be unilateral or bilateral and asymmetric and may involve the radial, carpal, and thenar bones. Aplasia, hypoplasia, fusion, or anomalous development of these bones produces a spectrum of phenotypes, including triphalangeal or absent thumbs. Occasionally, upper limb malformation can be sufficiently severe to produce phocomelia (a malformation in which the hands are attached close to the body); this has been termed pseudothalidomide syndrome. The most prevalent findings in persons with Holt-Oram syndrome are malformations or fusions of the carpal bones. Carpal bone abnormalities are the only findings present in every affected individual, although these anomalies may be evident only radiographically in some patients.

Cardiac involvement

Approximately 75% of patients have some cardiac abnormality. In most patients, the abnormality is either an atrial septal defect (ASD) or a ventricular septal defect (VSD), which varies in number, size, and location. ASDs are usually of the secundum variety, while VSDs tend to occur in the muscular trabeculated septum. Cardiac anomalies also may include cardiac conduction defects such as progressive atrioventricular block and atrial fibrillation.[3, 4] These anomalies are frequently present even in the absence of septal defects.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequencyUnited States

Holt-Oram syndrome is the most common form of heart-hand syndrome, with prevalence estimated at 0.95 cases per 100,000 total births. Approximately 85% of cases are attributed to new mutations.

Mortality/Morbidity

Structural lesions are present at birth. Prognosis depends on the severity of the cardiac lesions.

Significant intracardiac shunts can be associated with sudden death or the development of pulmonary hypertension and Eisenmenger syndrome. The first clinical manifestation of the disease may be heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias (including heart block), or infective endocarditis. Considerable physical and psychologic morbidity may be associated with limb abnormalities, particularly in severe cases.Sex

Holt-Oram syndrome has no sexual predilection.

AgeA congenital disease, Holt-Oram syndrome is present at birth. Subtle limb involvement may not become clinically apparent until later in life when the cardiac symptoms of the disease manifest or when an individual has a child with a more severe presentation of the syndrome. Cardiac conduction disease is progressive with aging.Middle-aged individuals often present with significant atrioventricular block or atrial fibrillation.PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Holt-Oram Syndrome
Background

Lutembacher syndrome is defined as a combination of mitral stenosis and a left-to-right shunt at the atrial level. Typically, the left-to-right shunt is an atrial septal defect (ASD) of the ostium secundum variety. Both these defects, ASD and mitral stenosis, can be either congenital or acquired.

The definition of Lutembacher syndrome has undergone many changes. The earliest description in medical literature is found in a letter written by anatomist Johann Friedrich Meckel to Albrecht von Haller in 1750.[1] In 1916, Lutembacher described his first case of this syndrome, involving a 61-year-old woman, and he attributed the mitral valvular lesion to congenital mitral stenosis. Because the mitral stenosis was, in fact, rheumatic in etiology, the syndrome was defined eventually as a combination of congenital ASD and acquired, almost always rheumatic, mitral stenosis.

In the current era of mitral valvuloplasty for acquired mitral stenosis, however, residual iatrogenic ASD secondary to transseptal puncture is more common than congenital ASD, as is the combination of ASD and mitral stenosis. Although this syndrome is generally defined as mitral stenosis in combination with ASD, some have argued to define the syndrome as a combination of ASD and any mitral valve lesion, ie, mitral stenosis, mitral insufficiency, or mixed lesion. Currently, any combination of ASD, congenital or iatrogenic, and mitral stenosis, congenital or acquired, is referred as Lutembacher syndrome.

NextPathophysiology

Mitral stenosis can be either congenital, as initially described, or acquired in origin, most commonly due to rheumatic mitral valve disease. Isolated mitral stenosis is now known to be a rare congenital disorder, and most cases of mitral stenosis initially thought to be congenital were, in fact, caused by rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Similarly, understanding of the etiology of ASD as associated with Lutembacher syndrome has evolved over time. Initially, high left atrial pressure due to mitral stenosis was thought to stretch open the patent foramen ovale (PFO), causing left-to-right shunt and providing another outlet for the left atrium. Now ASD in this syndrome, like mitral stenosis, is recognized as being either congenital or acquired, as already described.

Acquired ASD is almost always iatrogenic, either intentional or as a complication of a percutaneous interventional procedure. The incidence of left-to-right atrial shunt following mitral valvuloplasty is estimated at 11-12%. Although most of these ASDs are small and hemodynamically insignificant, some can be large enough to have hemodynamic consequences, especially in patients who develop restenosis of the mitral valve.

The hemodynamic effects of this syndrome are a result of the interplay between the relative effects of ASD and mitral stenosis. In its initial description, the ASD was typically large in Lutembacher syndrome, thus providing another route for blood flow. Iatrogenic ASDs tend to be smaller but still may be hemodynamically significant. The direction of blood flow is determined largely by the compliance of left and right ventricles. Normally, the right ventricle is more compliant than the left ventricle.

As a result, in the presence of mitral stenosis, blood flows to the right atrium through the ASD instead of going backward into the pulmonary veins, thus avoiding pulmonary congestion. This happens at the cost of progressive dilatation and, ultimately, failure of the right ventricle and reduced blood flow to the left ventricle. Development of Eisenmenger syndrome or irreversible pulmonary vascular disease is very uncommon in the presence of large ASD and high left atrial pressure because of mitral stenosis.

The term reverse Lutembacher syndrome is sometimes used to describe those rare cases in which a predominant right-to-left shunt develops owing to development of severe tricuspid stenosis.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequencyUnited States

The true incidence of the syndrome is not clearly known. Although mitral stenosis is encountered in 4% of patients with an ASD, congenital mitral stenosis itself is very rare, accounting for only 0.6% of congenital heart disease cases at autopsy. The incidence of ASD in patients with mitral stenosis is 0.6-0.7%. In one US study, the combination was found in 5 of 25,000 autopsies. The syndrome was diagnosed more frequently in the past for the following reasons:

Without echocardiography, the combination of mid diastolic murmur, actually due to increased blood flow across the tricuspid valve, and systolic murmur of ASD led to a mistaken diagnosis of Lutembacher syndrome. The prevalence of both rheumatic heart disease and mitral stenosis was higher in western developed countries before the antibiotic era. With the decline in the frequency of rheumatic fever, the prevalence of mitral stenosis has decreased and so has diagnosis of the syndrome. A history of rheumatic fever is frequently absent. Even though ASD may be underdiagnosed in the United States, the combination of ASD and mitral stenosis may not be evident on physical examination and for that reason is best confirmed by echocardiography. International

Although the exact prevalence of Lutembacher syndrome is not known, it is probably higher in areas where rheumatic heart disease is still common.

Mortality/Morbidity

No definite data are available. Mortality and morbidity rates are related to the relative severity of the individual lesions.

Race

No data are available regarding racial distribution of the condition.

Sex

Lutembacher syndrome is more common in females than males. Part of the reason is the higher incidence of both congenital ASD and rheumatic mitral stenosis in females.

Age

This syndrome can present at any age. Cases have been diagnosed in the seventh decade of life. Lutembacher's original case was a 61-year-old woman who had been pregnant 7 times. In the current era of balloon mitral valvuloplasty and development of ASD, the age of presentation may change.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Lutembacher Syndrome

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Practice Essentials

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) refers to a spectrum of clinical presentations ranging from those for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to presentations found in non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or in unstable angina. It is almost always associated with rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque and partial or complete thrombosis of the infarct-related artery.

Essential update: Discharge safe in suspected ACS if troponin and copeptin are negative

Patients with suspected ACS who test negative for troponin and copeptin can be safely discharged from the hospital without further testing, according to a recent study, the Biomarkers in Cardiology 8 (BiC-8) trial. Copeptin, a marker of severe hemodynamic stress, can be detected immediately in acute myocardial infarction.[1]

The study involved 902 patients at low to intermediate risk of ACS; half of the patients were treated with standard care, and the other 451 patients underwent a copeptin assay. In the latter group, patients with a positive copeptin test, defined as a level of 10 pmol/L or greater, were treated with standard ACS care, while patients with a copeptin level below 10 pmol/L were discharged into ambulant care, including an outpatient visit within 72 hours.

In the 451 patients tested for troponin and treated with standard care, the 30-day rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was 5.5%, compared with 5.46% in the 451 patients tested for troponin and copeptin, a statistically insignificant difference.

Signs and symptoms

Atherosclerosis is the primary cause of ACS, with most cases occurring from the disruption of a previously nonsevere lesion. Complaints reported by patients with ACS include the following:

PalpitationsPain, which is usually described as pressure, squeezing, or a burning sensation across the precordium and may radiate to the neck, shoulder, jaw, back, upper abdomen, or either arm Exertional dyspnea that resolves with pain or restDiaphoresis from sympathetic dischargeNausea from vagal stimulationDecreased exercise tolerance

Physical findings can range from normal to any of the following:

Hypotension: Indicates ventricular dysfunction due to myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction (MI), or acute valvular dysfunctionHypertension: May precipitate angina or reflect elevated catecholamine levels due to anxiety or to exogenous sympathomimetic stimulation DiaphoresisPulmonary edema and other signs of left heart failureExtracardiac vascular diseaseJugular venous distentionCool, clammy skin and diaphoresis in patients with cardiogenic shockA third heart sound (S3) and, frequently, a fourth heart sound (S4)A systolic murmur related to dynamic obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tractRales on pulmonary examination (suggestive of left ventricular dysfunction or mitral regurgitation)

Potential complications include the following:

Ischemia: Pulmonary edemaMyocardial infarction: Rupture of the papillary muscle, left ventricular free wall, and ventricular septum

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Guidelines for the management of non-ST-segment elevation ACS were released in 2011 by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).[2] The guidelines include the use of the CRUSADE risk score (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines).

In the emergency setting, electrocardiography (ECG) is the most important diagnostic test for angina. ECG changes that may be seen during anginal episodes include the following:

Transient ST-segment elevationsDynamic T-wave changes: Inversions, normalizations, or hyperacute changesST depressions: These may be junctional, downsloping, or horizontal

Laboratory studies that may be helpful include the following:

Creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) levelsCardiac troponin levelsMyoglobin levelsComplete blood countBasic metabolic panel

Diagnostic imaging modalities that may be useful include the following:

Chest radiographyEchocardiographyMyocardial perfusion imagingCardiac angiographyComputed tomography, including CT coronary angiography and CT coronary artery calcium scoring

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Initial therapy focuses on the following:

Stabilizing the patient’s conditionRelieving ischemic painProviding antithrombotic therapy

Pharmacologic anti-ischemic therapy includes the following:

Nitrates (for symptomatic relief)Beta blockers (eg, metoprolol): These are indicated in all patients unless contraindicated

Pharmacologic antithrombotic therapy includes the following:

AspirinClopidogrelPrasugrelTicagrelorGlycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban)

Pharmacologic anticoagulant therapy includes the following:

Unfractionated heparin (UFH)Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; dalteparin, nadroparin, enoxaparin)Factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, fondaparinux)

Additional therapeutic measures that may be indicated include the following:

ThrombolysisPercutaneous coronary intervention (preferred treatment for ST-elevation MI)

Current guidelines for patients with moderate- or high-risk ACS include the following:

Early invasive approachConcomitant antithrombotic therapy, including aspirin and clopidogrel, as well as UFH or LMWH

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image libraryA 62-year-old woman with a history of chronic stabA 62-year-old woman with a history of chronic stable angina and a "valve problem" presents with new chest pain. She is symptomatic on arrival, complaining of shortness of breath and precordial chest tightness. Her initial vital signs are blood pressure = 140/90 mm Hg and heart rate = 98. Her electrocardiogram (ECG) is as shown. She is given nitroglycerin sublingually, and her pressure decreases to 80/palpation. Right ventricular ischemia should be considered in this patient. NextBackground

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) refers to a spectrum of clinical presentations ranging from those for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to presentations found in non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or in unstable angina. In terms of pathology, ACS is almost always associated with rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque and partial or complete thrombosis of the infarct-related artery. (See Etiology.)

In some instances, however, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) may result in ACS in the absence of plaque rupture and thrombosis, when physiologic stress (eg, trauma, blood loss, anemia, infection, tachyarrhythmia) increases demands on the heart. The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in this setting requires a finding of the typical rise and fall of biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis in addition to at least 1 of the following[3] (See Workup.):

Ischemic symptomsDevelopment of pathologic Q wavesIschemic ST-segment changes on electrocardiogram (ECG) or in the setting of a coronary intervention

The terms transmural and nontransmural (subendocardial) myocardial infarction are no longer used because ECG findings in patients with this condition are not closely correlated with pathologic changes in the myocardium. Therefore, a transmural infarct may occur in the absence of Q waves on ECGs, and many Q-wave myocardial infarctions may be subendocardial, as noted on pathologic examination. Because elevation of the ST segment during ACS is correlated with coronary occlusion and because it affects the choice of therapy (urgent reperfusion therapy), ACS-related myocardial infarction should be designated STEMI or NSTEMI. (See Workup.)

Attention to the underlying mechanisms of ischemia is important when managing ACS. A simple predictor of demand is rate-pressure product, which can be lowered by beta blockers (eg, metoprolol or atenolol) and pain/stress relievers (eg, morphine), while supply may be improved by oxygen, adequate hematocrit, blood thinners (eg, heparin, IIb/IIIa agents such as abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, or thrombolytics), and/or vasodilators (eg, nitrates, amlodipine). (See Medications.)

In 2010, the American Heart Association (AHA) published new guideline recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ACS.[4]

PreviousNextEtiology

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is caused primarily by atherosclerosis. Most cases of ACS occur from disruption of a previously nonsevere lesion (an atherosclerotic lesion that was previously hemodynamically insignificant yet vulnerable to rupture). The vulnerable plaque is typified by a large lipid pool, numerous inflammatory cells, and a thin, fibrous cap.

Elevated demand can produce ACS in the presence of a high-grade fixed coronary obstruction, due to increased myocardial oxygen and nutrition requirements, such as those resulting from exertion, emotional stress, or physiologic stress (eg, from dehydration, blood loss, hypotension, infection, thyrotoxicosis, or surgery).

ACS without elevation in demand requires a new impairment in supply, typically due to thrombosis and/or plaque hemorrhage.

The major trigger for coronary thrombosis is considered to be plaque rupture caused by the dissolution of the fibrous cap, the dissolution itself being the result of the release of metalloproteinases (collagenases) from activated inflammatory cells. This event is followed by platelet activation and aggregation, activation of the coagulation pathway, and vasoconstriction. This process culminates in coronary intraluminal thrombosis and variable degrees of vascular occlusion. Distal embolization may occur. The severity and duration of coronary arterial obstruction, the volume of myocardium affected, the level of demand on the heart, and the ability of the rest of the heart to compensate are major determinants of a patient's clinical presentation and outcome. (Anemia and hypoxemia can precipitate myocardial ischemia in the absence of severe reduction in coronary artery blood flow.)

A syndrome consisting of chest pain, ischemic ST-segment and T-wave changes, elevated levels of biomarkers of myocyte injury, and transient left ventricular apical ballooning (takotsubo syndrome) has been shown to occur in the absence of clinical CAD, after emotional or physical stress. The etiology of this syndrome is not well understood but is thought to relate to a surge of catechol stress hormones and/or high sensitivity to those hormones.

PreviousNextPrognosis

Six-month mortality rates in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) were 13% for patients with NSTEMI ACS and 8% for those with unstable angina.

An elevated level of troponin (a type of regulatory protein found in skeletal and cardiac muscle) permits risk stratification of patients with ACS and identifies patients at high risk for adverse cardiac events (ie, myocardial infarction, death) up to 6 months after the index event.[5, 6] (See Workup.)

The PROVE IT-TIMI trial found that after ACS, a J-shaped or U-shaped curve association is observed between BP and the risk of future cardiovascular events.[7]

LeLeiko et al determined that serum choline and free F(2)-isoprostane are also predictors of cardiac events in ACS. The authors evaluated the prognostic value of vascular inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers in patients with ACS to determine their role in predicting 30-day clinical outcomes. Serum F(2)-isoprostane had an optimal cutoff level of 124.5 pg/mL, and serum choline had a cutoff level of 30.5 µmol/L. Choline and F(2)-isoprostane had a positive predictive value of 44% and 57% and a negative predictive value of 89% and 90%, respectively.[8]

Testosterone deficiency is common in patients with coronary disease and has a significant negative impact on mortality. Further study is needed to assess the effect of treatment on survival.[9]

A study by Sanchis et al suggests renal dysfunction, dementia, peripheral artery disease, previous heart failure, and previous myocardial infarction are the comorbid conditions that predict mortality in NSTEMI ACS.[10] In patients with comorbid conditions, the highest risk period was in the first weeks after NSTEMI ACS. In-hospital management of patients with comorbid conditions merits further investigation.

Patients with end-stage renal disease often develop ACS, and little is known about the natural history of ACS in patients receiving dialysis. Gurm et al examined the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with ACS who received dialysis before presentation for an ACS. These patients were enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) at 123 hospitals in 14 countries from 1999-2007.

NSTEMI ACS was the most common in patients receiving dialysis, occurring in 50% of patients (290 of 579) versus 33% (17,955 of 54,610) of those not receiving dialysis The in-hospital mortality rates were higher among patients receiving dialysis (12% vs 4.8%; p [11]

In a study that assessed the impact of prehospital time on STEMI outcome, Chughatai et al suggest that “total time to treatment” should be used as a core measure instead of “door-to-balloon time.”[12] This is because on-scene time was the biggest fraction of "pre-hospital time.” The study compared groups with total time to treatment of more than 120 minutes compared with 120 minutes or less and found mortalities were 4 compared with 0 and transfers to a tertiary care facility were 3 compared with 1, respectively.

PreviousNextPatient Education

Patient education of risk factors is important, but more attention is needed regarding delays in door-to-balloon time, and one major barrier to improving this delay is patient education regarding his or her symptoms. Lack of recognition of symptoms may cause tremendous delays in seeking medical attention.

Educate patients about the dangers of cigarette smoking, a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). The risk of recurrent coronary events decreases 50% at 1 year after smoking cessation. Provide all patients who smoke with guidance, education, and support to avoid smoking. Smoking-cessation classes should be offered to help patients avoid smoking after a myocardial infarction. Bupropion increases the likelihood of successful smoking cessation.

Diet plays an important role in the development of CAD. Therefore, prior to hospital discharge, a patient who has had a myocardial infarction should be evaluated by a dietitian. Patients should be informed about the benefits of a low-cholesterol, low-salt diet. In addition, educate patients about AHA dietary guidelines regarding a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet.

A cardiac rehabilitation program after discharge may reinforce education and enhance compliance.

The following mnemonic may useful in educating patients with CAD regarding treatments and lifestyle changes necessitated by their condition:

A = Aspirin and antianginalsB = Beta blockers and blood pressure (BP)C = Cholesterol and cigarettesD = Diet and diabetesE = Exercise and education

For patients being discharged home, emphasize the following:

Timely follow-up with primary care providerCompliance with discharge medications, specifically aspirin and other medications used to control symptomsNeed to return to the ED for any change in frequency or severity of symptomsPreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Acute Coronary Syndrome

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Background

Alcohol consumed in large quantities for many years has long been recognized to induce an alcoholic cardiomyopathy. Clinically identical to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, alcoholic cardiomyopathy is a major form of secondary dilated cardiomyopathy in the Western world. (See Medscape Reference articles Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy and Dilated Cardiomyopathy.) With this change in cardiac structure and decline in function, there exists the substrate for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. However, only within the past 20-25 years has the arrhythmogenic potential of short-term alcohol consumption been elucidated in patients without clinically evident heart failure.

In 1978, Ettinger et al conducted a study evaluating 32 separate dysrhythmic episodes in 24 patients. These patients consumed alcohol heavily and regularly; in addition, they took part in a weekend or holiday drinking binge immediately prior to evaluation. Based on the results of this study, the term holiday heart syndrome was coined. It was defined as an acute cardiac rhythm and/or conduction disturbance, most commonly supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, associated with heavy ethanol consumption in a person without other clinical evidence of heart disease. Typically, this resolved rapidly with spontaneous recovery during subsequent abstinence from alcohol use.[1]

Holiday heart syndrome now most commonly refers to the association between alcohol use and rhythm disturbances, particularly supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in apparently healthy people. Similar reports have indicated that recreational use of marijuana may have similar effects.[2] The most common rhythm disorder is atrial fibrillation, which usually converts to normal sinus rhythm within 24 hours.[3] Holiday heart syndrome should be particularly considered as a diagnosis in patients without structural heart disease and with new-onset atrial fibrillation.[4] Although the syndrome can recur, its clinical course is benign, and specific antiarrhythmic therapy is usually not indicated. Interestingly, even modest alcohol intake can be identified as a trigger in some patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.[5]

NextPathophysiology

Several mechanisms are theorized to be responsible for the arrhythmogenicity of alcohol. These include an increased secretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine, increased sympathetic output, a rise in the level of plasma free fatty acids, and an indirect effect through acetaldehyde, the primary metabolite of alcohol, or fatty acid ethyl esters, a cardiac alcohol metabolite.[6] Alcohol can also directly decrease sodium current and can affect intracellular pH, ether causing acidosis with low doses or alkalosis with higher doses. Interestingly, these effects may be species specific, with rabbits[7] and humans being similarly affected while the dog atria appear unaffected[8] .

Analysis of ECGs performed following resolution of arrhythmias in patients who have consumed a large quantity of alcohol show significant prolongation of the PR, QRS, and QT intervals compared with patients who experienced arrhythmias in the absence of alcohol consumption.[9] The arrhythmogenicity of alcohol has also been examined in the electrophysiology laboratory.

One study evaluated 14 patients with a history of significant alcohol consumption. Initially, the atrial and ventricular extrastimulus technique induced nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 1 patient, nonsustained atrial fibrillation in 1 patient, paired ventricular responses in 1 patient, and no response in the remaining 11 patients. Following administration of alcohol, 10 of the 14 patients developed sustained or nonsustained tachyarrhythmias in response to the extrastimulus technique, with significant prolongation of His-ventricular conduction.[10]

In another study, ingestion of whiskey resulted in no change in the atrial refractory period but facilitated induction of atrial flutter in individuals who were chronic drinkers and those who were nondrinkers. This evidence strongly suggests that alcohol possesses proarrhythmic properties. These seem to be more pronounced in patients with larger P wave dispersion. Although ventricular repolarization abnormalities on surface ECG were described, whether ventricular myocardium responds similarly to ethanol is uncertain. One case of ventricular fibrillation was described in a patient with heavy alcohol ingestion, but an electrophysiologic study (EPS) revealed only inducibility of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response but no ventricular arrhythmias.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequencyUnited States

The frequency with which cardiac arrhythmias can be attributed to alcohol use is unclear owing to differing data. One study showed alcohol as the causative agent in 35% of cases of new-onset atrial fibrillation and in 63% of cases in patients younger than 65 years.[11] Conversely, another study showed only about 5-10% of all new episodes of atrial fibrillation to be explainable by alcohol use.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common rhythm disturbance associated with alcohol consumption. Atrial flutter, isolated ventricular premature beats, isolated atrial premature beats, junctional tachycardia, and various other rhythm disturbances may occur with less frequency.

International

Worldwide prevalence is not well documented. Prevalence is presumably increased in countries with higher rates of alcohol ingestion and alcoholism.

Mortality/Morbidity

Regular consumption of alcohol in modest amounts does not seem to have the same potential to cause arrhythmias as alcohol consumed in heavy amounts. In fact, it has been shown in a sample of patients whose usual daily alcohol intake exceeds 6 drinks that the risk of developing atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and atrial premature beats is at least twice that of patients who drink alcohol at least monthly but who on average consume less than a single drink daily.

Race

Evidence regarding race is unavailable.

Sex

An increased incidence of the holiday heart syndrome has not been clearly documented in males; however, this can be inferred as males have a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation and alcoholism.

Age

Although atrial fibrillation increases with age, it is unclear if holiday heart syndrome is more common in elderly patients, since this age group is more likely to have structural heart disease.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Holiday Heart Syndrome
Background

The Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome (LGL) is a clinical syndrome consisting of paroxysms of tachycardia and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings of a short PR interval and normal QRS duration. LGL is usually categorized in a class of preexcitation syndromes that includes the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW), LGL, and Mahaim-type preexcitation.[1] Investigations into WPW have revealed that an accessory pathway for conduction, called a bundle of Kent, from the atria to the ventricles underlies the preexcitation observed in patients with WPW. Less is known regarding the structural anomalies underlying LGL. Theories proposed to explain LGL have centered around the possible existence of intranodal or paranodal fibers that bypass all or part of the atrioventricular (AV) node.

In 1938, Clerc, Levy, and Critesco first described the occurrence of frequent paroxysms of tachycardia in patients with a short PR interval and normal QRS duration.[2] This syndrome was again described in 1952 by Lown, Ganong, and Levine, whose names form the eponym now used to describe it.[3] In 1946, Burch and Kimball proposed that an atrio-Hisian (AH) pathway might explain the findings of the syndrome, although no such pathway had yet been identified anatomically.[4] In 1961, James described fibers that originate in the low atrium and terminate low in the AV node.[5] Brechenmacher et al reported anatomic findings of an AH bundle in 1974.[6] Subsequent investigations into the origin of LGL have largely involved invasive electrophysiologic studies that have sought to identify structural and functional anomalies that might explain the findings of LGL.[7, 8]

Criteria for LGL include a PR interval less than or equal to 0.12 second (120 ms), normal QRS complex duration of less than 120 ms, and occurrence of a clinical tachycardia.[3, 9, 10]

Historically, some authors have referred to patients with a short PR interval and normal QRS duration as having LGL. However, this practice has been largely abandoned as more evidence has accumulated demonstrating that such patients without a history of tachycardia likely fall into a class of normal variants. Patients with an isolated finding of short PR interval may be characterized as having accelerated atrioventricular nodal conduction.

The term enhanced atrioventricular nodal conduction (EAVNC) refers to a set of functional criteria that includes an AH interval less than or equal to 60 ms, 1-to-1 AV nodal conduction at rates as high as 200 beats per minute, and an abnormally small increase in AH interval as atrial pacing rate is increased.[11]

EAVNC represents a functional characterization of the AV node, whereas LGL refers to a syndrome of supraventricular tachycardia in association with a short PR interval. The short PR interval in LGL may be related to the presence of EAVNC. LGL and EAVNC may coexist, or either may exist alone in a given patient.

NextPathophysiology

The syndrome described by Lown, Ganong, and Levine in 1952 associated the occurrence of tachycardia with presence of a short PR interval and normal QRS. Subsequent investigations have failed to identify a unifying anatomic basis that accounts for both occurrence of tachycardia and presence of a short PR interval. Rather, several mechanisms have been proposed for the coexistence of a short PR interval and normal QRS[12, 13, 14] , while the occurrence of tachycardias has separately been found to be largely based on previously identified conditions, such as AV nodal reentry tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia.[15, 16]

No single structural anomaly has been implicated directly as the cause of the short PR interval and normal QRS in LGL. Indeed, most authors believe that LGL does not exist as a phenomenon separate from other known conditions. Several structural anomalies have been proposed as the possible basis for LGL,[17, 18] including the presence of James fibers,[19] Mahaim fibers,[20] Brechenmacher-type fibers,[6] and an anatomically underdeveloped (hypoplastic)[21] or small AV node.[22, 15]

James fibers run from the upper portion of the AV node and insert into the lower portion of the AV node, or into the bundle of His.[5] Thus, conduction over James fibers bypasses some of the intrinsic AV nodal delay, which shortens the PR interval; the QRS configuration remains normal, as ventricular activation occurs normally via His-Purkinje system.

Mahaim fibers are muscular bridges, almost exclusively right-sided in occurrence, that may originate in the lower portion of the AV node, the upper portion of the bundle of His, or the bundle branches. Mahaim fibers terminate in the interventricular septum or in a bundle branch.

Brechenmacher described fibers that run from the atrium to the His bundle, bypassing the AV node altogether.

Each of these fibers has been identified histologically. However, none of these anomalous communications has been uniquely linked to the presence of LGL. Moreover, the histologic presence of fibers does not speak to whether these fibers are functional, with conductive properties.

EAVNC has been investigated as a possible functional basis for LGL.[23] The criteria for EAVNC were established arbitrarily on the basis of observations of some patients with what seemed to be abnormally rapid AV nodal conduction times. However, in 1980, Bauernfeind and colleagues described a unimodal distribution of PR intervals in a series of 65 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.[24]

Further, in 1983 Jackman et al provided convincing evidence that EAVNC does not exist as a phenomenon separate from normal AV nodal physiology, but that AV nodal conduction physiology comprises a spectrum of AH intervals.[11] In their series of 160 consecutive patients, they failed to identify a distinct group of patients with abnormally rapid AV nodal conduction. Rather, they found a broad spectrum of AH intervals in a unimodal, continuous distribution. Importantly, among patients with dual pathways, patients with shorter AH intervals do have a greater likelihood of developing AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.[25]

The modern view of LGL is that no convincing evidence suggests that this is a syndrome separate from other known phenomena. LGL was identified as a clinical syndrome prior to the advent of catheter-based electrophysiologic (EP) studies. EP studies and histopathologic studies have identified several underlying mechanisms that can account for the presence of a short PR interval and normal QRS. These mechanisms include enhanced AV nodal conduction, several types of fibers that bypass all or part of the AV node, and an anatomically small AV node. Studies incorporating electrophysiologic data have separately identified several types tachycardias that occur in patients with LGL. The most common tachycardias include AV nodal reentry, accessory pathway mediated tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and ventricular tachycardia.[26, 23]

To date, the underlying mechanisms that generate a short PR interval in LGL have not been found to be necessary for the development of the tachycardias identified in patients with LGL. In the case of enhanced AV nodal conduction, the short PR interval reflects anterograde conduction over the fast AV nodal pathway; however, during the most common form of AV nodal reentry, which is the most common tachycardia in patients with LGL, conduction occurs anterograde over the AV nodal slow pathway and retrograge up the AV nodal fast pathway.

Enhanced conduction over the fast pathway is not necessary for existence of the tachycardia (normal fast pathway conduction would suffice). Even the rate of the tachycardia is largely determined by slow pathway conduction, which is independent of the short PR interval mechanism.[24] Similarly, the presence of fibers that bypass all or part of the AV node is not necessary for the occurrence of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter; functionally, these fibers may facilitate more rapid conduction of atrial arrhythmias to the ventricles.

In summary, LGL is a clinical diagnosis born of the era before EP study. Many mechanisms have been identified to describe the coexistence of a short PR interval and normal QRS and many tachycardias have been identified in patients with LGL. However, none of the identified short PR interval mechanisms is necessary for the generation of LGL tachycardias.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyFrequencyUnited States

Lown and associates described tachyarrhythmias in 17% of patients with a short PR interval.[3] Some 2-4% of the adult population has a PR interval less than or equal to 0.12 second.[23] Taken together, these data provide an estimate of the frequency of LGL as 0.5% of the adult population.

International

Frequency mirrors that in the United States.

Mortality/Morbidity

Paroxysms of tachycardia represent the primary morbidity of LGL. Few data are available regarding the frequency of these paroxysms. Data regarding mortality from LGL are scant. In their original report, Lown, Ganong, and Levine reported 6 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 2 of whom suffered sudden cardiac death.[3] Numbers in published studies are too small to estimate mortality rate with significant accuracy or confidence. In the absence of significant structural heart disease, the mortality rate appears to be very low.

Sex

In their 1952 manuscript, Lown, Ganong, and Levine reported 70.9% of their 34 cases to have occurred in women.[3]

Age

The average age of onset of tachycardia in LGL is 33.5 years.[3]

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation , Lown-Ganong-Levine Syndrome

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Practice Essentials

In 1930, Wolff, Parkinson, and White described a series of young patients who experienced paroxysms of tachycardia and had characteristic abnormalities on electrocardiography (ECG).[1] Currently, Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is defined as a congenital condition involving abnormal conductive tissue between the atria and the ventricles that provides a pathway for a reentrant tachycardia circuit.

Essential update: New treatment study of children with WPW

Irrigated-tip catheters have been used for ablation of accessory pathways in adults with WPW syndrome, but the safety of this technique in children has been in question. In a prospective study of consecutive patients younger than 18 years, Gulletta et al achieved overall procedural success after the first procedure in 39 of 41 cases (95%), with no complications and no recurrences. Mean procedure time was 26.4 minutes, and mean fluoroscopy time was 12.2 minutes.[24]

Signs and symptoms

Clinical manifestations of WPW syndrome may have their onset at any time from childhood to middle age, and they can vary in severity from mild chest discomfort or palpitations with or without syncope to severe cardiopulmonary compromise and cardiac arrest. Presentation varies by patient age.

Infants may present with the following:

TachypneaIrritabilityPallorIntolerance of feedingsEvidence of congestive heart failure if the episode has been untreated for several hoursA history of not behaving as usual for 1-2 daysAn intercurrent febrile illness may be present

A verbal child with WPW syndrome usually reports the following:

Chest painPalpitationsBreathing difficulty

Older patients can usually describe the following:

Sudden onset of a pounding heartbeatPulse that is regular and “too rapid to count”Typically, a concomitant reduction in their tolerance for activity

Physical findings include the following:

Normal cardiac examination findings in the vast majority of casesDuring tachycardic episodes, the patient may be cool, diaphoretic, and hypotensiveCrackles in the lungs from pulmonary vascular congestionIn many young patients, only minimal symptoms (eg, palpitations, weakness, mild dizziness) despite exceedingly fast heart rates

Clinical features of associated cardiac defects may be present, such as the following:

CardiomyopathyEbstein anomalyHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (AMPK mutation)[8]

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Routine blood studies may be needed to help rule out noncardiac conditions triggering tachycardia. These may include the following:

Complete blood countChemistry panel, with renal function studies and electrolytesLiver function testsThyroid panelDrug screening

The diagnosis of WPW syndrome is typically made with formal ECG monitoring (eg, telemetry, Holter monitoring) in conjunction with clues from the history and physical examination. Although the ECG morphology varies widely, the classic ECG features are as follows:

A shortened PR intervalA slurring and slow rise of the initial upstroke of the QRS complex (delta wave)A widened QRS complex (total duration >0.12 seconds)ST segment–T wave changes, generally directed opposite the major delta wave and QRS complex

Echocardiography is needed for the following:

Evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function and wall motion abnormalitiesExcluding cardiomyopathy and an associated congenital heart defect (eg, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Ebstein anomaly, L-transposition of the great vessels)

Stress testing is ancillary and may be used for the following:

To reproduce a transient paroxysmal dysrhythmiaTo document the relationship of exercise to the onset of tachycardiaTo evaluate the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Electrophysiologic studies (EPS) can be used in patients with WPW syndrome to determine the following:

The mechanism of the clinical dysrhythmiaThe electrophysiologic properties (eg, conduction capability, refractory periods) of the accessory pathway and the normal atrioventricular (AV) nodal and His Purkinje conduction system The number and locations of accessory pathways (necessary for catheter ablation)The response to pharmacologic or ablation therapy

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Treatment of WPW dysrhythmias comprises the following:

Radiofrequency ablation of the accessory pathwayAntiarrhythmic drugs to slow accessory pathway conductionAV nodal blocking medications to slow AV nodal conductionAddressing the triggers that perpetuate the dysrhythmia, which include coronary heart disease, ischemia, cardiomyopathy, pericarditis, electrolyte disturbances, thyroid disease, and anemia

Termination of acute episodes

Narrow-complex AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are treated by blocking AV node conduction with the following:

Vagal maneuvers (eg, Valsalva maneuver, carotid sinus massage, splashing cold water or ice water on the face)IV adenosine 6-12 mg via a large-bore line (the drug has a very short half-life)IV verapamil 5-10 mg or diltiazem 10 mg

Atrial flutter/fibrillation or wide-complex tachycardia is treated as follows:

IV procainamide or amiodarone if wide-complex tachycardia is present, ventricular tachycardia (VT) cannot be excluded, and the patient is stable hemodynamically Ibutilide

The initial treatment of choice for hemodynamically unstable tachycardia is direct current synchronized electrical cardioversion, biphasic, as follows:

A level of 100 J (monophasic or lower biphasic) initiallyIf necessary, a second shock with higher energy (200 J or 360 J)

Radiofrequency ablation

Radiofrequency ablation is indicated in the following patients:

Patients with symptomatic AVRTPatients with AF or other atrial tachyarrhythmias that have rapid ventricular response via an accessory pathway (preexcited AF) Patients with AVRT or AF with rapid ventricular rates found incidentally during EPS for unrelated dysrhythmia, if the shortest preexcited RR interval during AF is less than 250 ms Asymptomatic patients with ventricular preexcitation whose livelihood, profession, insurability, or mental well-being may be influenced by unpredictable tachyarrhythmias or in whom such tachyarrhythmias would endanger the public safety[20] Patients with WPW and a family history of sudden cardiac death

Surgical treatment

Radiofrequency catheter ablation has virtually eliminated surgical open heart treatments in the vast majority of WPW patients, with the following exceptions:

Patients in whom RF catheter ablation (with repeated attempts) failsPatients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery (possible exception)Patients with other tachycardias with multiple foci who require surgical intervention (very rare)

Long-term antiarrhythmic therapy

Oral medication is the mainstay of therapy in patients not undergoing radiofrequency ablation, although the response to long-term antiarrhythmic therapy for the prevention of further episodes of tachycardia in patients with WPW syndrome remains quite variable and unpredictable. Choices include the following:

Dual-drug therapy (eg, procainamide and verapamil [class Ia and IV])Class Ic drugs (eg, flecainide, propafenone), typically used with an AV nodal blocking agentClass III drugs (eg, amiodarone, sotalol)In pregnancy, sotalol (class B) or flecainide (class C)

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Image libraryClassic Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiogram wiClassic Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiogram with short PR, QRS >120 ms, and delta wave. NextBackground

In 1930, Wolff, Parkinson, and White described a series of young patients who had a bundle branch block pattern on electrocardiography (ECG) findings, a short PR interval, and paroxysms of tachycardia.[1] Case reports began appearing in the literature in the late 1930s and early 1940s, and the term Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome was coined in 1940.

Preexcitation was defined by Durrer et al in 1970 with the following statement, "Preexcitation exists, if in relation to atrial events, the whole or some part of the ventricular muscle is activated earlier by the impulse originating from the atrium than would be expected if the impulse reached the ventricles by way of the normal specific conduction system only."[2]

WPW syndrome is currently defined as a congenital abnormality involving the presence of abnormal conductive tissue between the atria and the ventricles in association with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). It involves preexcitation, which occurs because of conduction of an atrial impulse not by means of the normal conduction system, but via an extra atrioventricular (AV) muscular connection, termed an accessory pathway (AP), that bypasses the AV node.[3, 4]

Classic ECG findings that are associated with WPW syndrome include the following:

Presence of a short PR interval (A wide QRS complex longer than 120 ms with a slurred onset of the QRS waveform producing a delta wave in the early part of QRS Secondary ST-T wave changes (see the image below)Classic Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiogram wiClassic Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiogram with short PR, QRS >120 ms, and delta wave.

Patients with WPW syndrome are potentially at an increased risk of dangerous ventricular arrhythmias due to extremely fast conduction across the bypass tract if they develop atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation (AF).

Some patients have a concealed bypass tract. Although they have an accessory AV connection, it lacks antegrade conduction; accordingly, these patients do not have the classic abnormalities of the surface ECG.

Only a small percentage of patients with WPW syndrome (sudden cardiac death (SCD). In patients who present with preexcited AF, cardiac electrophysiologic studies and radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation may be curative. Other presentations include symptomatic SVT, which can also be cured by catheter ablation. Asymptomatic patients need periodic observation. The onset of cardiac arrhythmias, and possibly the sudden death risk, may be eliminated by prophylactic catheter ablation as well.[5]

This review discusses the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, evaluation, and treatment of patients with WPW syndrome.

Go to Management of Acute Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome for complete information on this topic.

PreviousNextPathophysiology

Accessory pathways or connections between the atrium and ventricle are the result of anomalous embryonic development of myocardial tissue bridging the fibrous tissues that separate the two chambers. This allows electrical conduction between the atria and ventricles at sites other than the AV node. Passage through APs circumvents the usual conduction delay between the atria and ventricles, which normally occurs at the AV node, and predisposes the patient to develop tachydysrhythmias.

Although dozens of locations for bypass tracts can exist in preexcitation, including atriofascicular, fasciculoventricular, nodofascicular, or nodoventricular, the most common bypass tract is an accessory atrioventricular (AV) pathway otherwise known as a Kent bundle. This is the anomaly seen in WPW syndrome. The primary feature that differentiates WPW syndrome from other AP-mediated supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) is the ability of the AP to conduct in either an antegrade (ie, from atrium to ventricles) or a retrograde manner.

The presence of an AP allows a reentrant tachycardia circuit to be established. This reentrant mechanism is the typical cause of the SVT of which patients with preexcitation are at risk. The genesis of reentrant SVT involves the presence of dual conducting pathways between the atria and the ventricles[6] :

The natural AV nodal His-Purkinje tractOne or more AV accessory tract(s) (ie, AV connection or AP, Kent fibers, Mahaim fibers)

These pathways usually exhibit different conduction properties and refractory periods that facilitate reentry. The effective refractory period (ERP, the time necessary for the electrical recovery needed to conduct the next impulse) of the accessory tract is often longer than that of the normal AV nodal His-Purkinje tract and requires time for conduction to recover before allowing reentry.

The degree of preexcitation on a surface ECG in a person with WPW pattern can be estimated by the width of the QRS and the length of the PR interval. A wider or more preexcited QRS with a short PR interval with absent or nearly absent isoelectric component reveals that most (or all) of the ventricular depolarization initiates through the AP insertion rather than through the AV node/His Purkinje system.

However, the QRS width may vary, becoming narrower during more rapid heart rates. This is possible because catecholamines permit the AV node to contribute more (or entirely) to ventricular depolarization by enhancing AV node conduction.

Types of SVT include orthodromic tachycardia (down the AV nodal His-Purkinje system and retrograde conduction up an AP), orthodromic tachycardia with a concealed AP (retrograde conduction only), and antidromic tachycardia (down the AP and retrograde conduction up the His-Purkinje system and AV node). In patients with WPW in which the AP participates, 95% of SVT is due to orthodromic tachycardia and 5% is due to antidromic tachycardia.

Orthodromic tachycardia

When a premature ectopic atrial impulse advances towards the ventricle, it may block at the AP but conduct in down the normal AVN/His Purkinje pathway. The impulse then reenters the AP in a retrograde fashion to perpetuate a circus movement of the impulse. Such reentrant tachycardia is described as orthodromic. Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) can also initiate orthodromic tachycardia.

In orthodromic tachycardia, the normal pathway is used for ventricular depolarization, and the AP is used for the retrograde conduction essential for reentry. On ECG findings, the delta wave is absent, the QRS complex is normal, and P waves are typically inverted in the inferior and lateral leads.

Orthodromic tachycardia with concealed accessory pathway

Some APs are unable to conduct in an antegrade fashion. These are called concealed APs (as in concealed WPW syndrome) because manifest preexcitation is considered to be a pattern visible on the usual surface ECG. They account for about 30% of all SVTs induced on EPS.

Although no evidence of the pathway is present during sinus rhythm (ie, no preexcitation), orthodromic tachycardias can occur. Orthodromic tachycardia may also occur when there are 2 or more accessory connections, and in that case, the retrograde conduction may occur through the AV node, through one of the accessory connections, or through both.

This type of SVT may be difficult to distinguish from the usual AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) on the standard surface ECG. If the heart rate is higher than 200 bpm with QRS alternans and a retrograde P wave visible in the ST segment (long R-P tachycardia) following the QRS complex, a concealed AP may be the diagnosis. This determination is most accurately made with EPS.

Antidromic tachycardia

Less commonly, a shorter refractory period in the AP may cause blockade of an ectopic atrial impulse in the normal pathway, with antegrade conduction down the AP and then retrograde reentry of the normal AV nodal pathway. This type of tachycardia is called antidromic tachycardia.

On ECG, the QRS is wide, reflecting an exaggeration of the delta wave during sinus rhythm (ie, wide-QRS tachycardia). Such tachycardias are difficult to differentiate from ventricular tachycardias and often have a slurred R wave upstroke with QRS duration longer than 160 ms.

Only about 5% of the tachycardias in patients who have WPW syndrome are antidromic tachycardias; the remaining 95% are orthodromic. Even when the AP conducts solely in a retrograde fashion, it can still participate in the reentrant circuit and produce an orthodromic AV reciprocating tachycardia with a narrow QRS morphology. The presence of an antidromic tachycardia should prompt a careful search for a second bypass tract.

Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome

Another common preexcitation syndrome, Lown-Ganong-Levine (LGL) syndrome, also has an AP—the James fibers, which connect the atria serially to the His bundle. This leads to accelerated conduction to the ventricle without QRS widening, as the distal pathway remains the His Purkinje system. This pathway is not typically involved in re-entrant tachycardias, and is observed clinically.

PreviousNextEtiology

APs are considered congenital phenomena that are related to a failure of insulating tissue maturation within the AV ring—even though their manifestations are often detected in later years, making them appear to be acquired.

Family studies, as well as recent molecular genetic investigations, indicate that WPW syndrome, along with associated preexcitation disorders, may have a genetic component. It may be inherited as a familial trait, with or without associated congenital heart defects (CHDs)[7] ; 3.4% of those with WPW syndrome have first-degree relatives with preexcitation.

The familial form is usually inherited as a Mendelian autosomal dominant trait. Although rare, mitochondrial inheritance has also been described. The syndrome may also be inherited with other cardiac and noncardiac disorders, such as familial atrial septal defects, familial hypokalemic periodic paralysis, and tuberous sclerosis.

Clinicians have long recognized the association of WPW syndrome with autosomal dominant familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, only comparatively recently was a genetic substrate linking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to WPW syndrome and skeletal myopathy described.[8]

Patients with mutations in the gamma 2 subunit of adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (PRKAG2) develop cardiomyopathy characterized by ventricular hypertrophy, WPW syndrome, AV block, and progressive degenerative conduction system disease. The mutation is believed to produce disruption of the annulus fibrosus by accumulation of glycogen within myocytes, which causes preexcitation. This is thought to be the case in Pompe disease, Danon disease, and other glycogen-storage diseases.

Infantile Pompe disease or glycogen-storage disease type II is a fatal genetic muscle disorder that is caused by deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA). These patients have a shortened PR interval, large left ventricular (LV) voltages, and an increased QT dispersion (QTd).

Mutations in the lysosome-associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2), which cause accumulation of cardiac glycogen, are thought to be the etiology of a significant number of hypertrophic cardiomyopathies in children, especially when skeletal myopathy, WPW syndrome, or both are present.

For example, Danon disease is an X-linked lysosomal cardioskeletal myopathy; males are more often and more severely affected than females. It is caused by mutations in the LAMP2 that produce proximal muscle weakness and mild atrophy, left ventricle hypertrophy, WPW syndrome, and mental retardation.

Patients with the Ebstein anomaly may develop WPW syndrome. They frequently have multiple accessory bypass tracts, mostly on the right, in the posterior part of the septum or the posterolateral wall of the right ventricle. The orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia in such patients often exhibits right bundle-branch block (RBBB) and a long ventriculoatrial (VA) interval.

Preexcitation can be surgically created, as in certain types of Bjork modifications of the Fontan procedure, if atrial tissue is flapped onto and sutured to ventricular tissue. Certain tumors of the AV ring, such as rhabdomyomas, may also cause preexcitation.

PreviousNextEpidemiologyUnited States statistics

The prevalence of ventricular preexcitation is thought to be 0.1-0.3%, or 1 to 3 per 1000 people in the general population. Estimates of arrhythmia incidence in patients with preexcitation vary widely, ranging from 12% to 80% in several surveys.

The incidence of preexcitation and WPW syndrome ranges from 0.1 to 3 cases per 1000 population (average, 1.5 cases per 1000 population) in otherwise healthy persons. This includes only patients with manifest preexcitation (delta wave evident on surface 12-lead ECG). About 60-70% of these individuals have no other evidence of heart disease. Approximately 4 newly diagnosed cases of WPW syndrome per 100,000 population occur each year.

In a review of ECG findings from 22,500 healthy aviation personnel, 0.25% exhibited findings consistent with the WPW pattern, with a 1.8% reported incidence of tachycardia.

The location of the APs, in descending order of frequency, is (1) 53%, the left free wall, (2) 36%, posteroseptal, (3) 8%, right free wall, and (4) 3%, anteroseptal. The presence of concealed APs accounts for approximately 30% of patients with apparent SVT referred for EPS. These patients do not have true WPW syndrome because no delta wave is present, but they do have the potential for orthodromic tachycardia.

Approximately 80% of patients with WPW syndrome have a reciprocating tachycardia, 15-30% will develop AF, and 5% have atrial flutter. Ventricular tachycardia is uncommon. Patients with mitral valve prolapse have an association with WPW, but the mechanism is unclear.

International statistics

Worldwide, the incidence and prevalence of WPW syndrome parallel those seen in the United States.

Age-related differences in incidence

WPW syndrome is found in persons of all ages. Most patients with WPW syndrome present during infancy. However, a second peak of presentation is noted in school-aged children and in adolescents. This interesting bimodal age distribution is due to permanent or transitory loss of preexcitation during infancy in some patients and during late adolescence in others.

The prevalence of WPW syndrome decreases with age as a consequence of apparent attenuation of conduction speed in the AP. About one fourth of patients lose preexcitation over a 10-year period, probably as a result of fibrotic changes at the site of insertion of the accessory bypass tract with loss of electrical conduction properties between cardiac chambers. Cases have been described in which ECG evidence of preexcitation disappears completely. One tenth of patients with concealed APs lose retrograde conduction over 10 years.

In asymptomatic patients, antegrade conduction across the accessory pathway (AP) may spontaneously disappear with advancing age (one fourth of patients lose antegrade bypass tract conduction over 10 years).

In patients with abnormal ECG findings indicative of WPW syndrome, the frequency of SVT paroxysms increases from 10% in people aged 20-39 years to 36% in people older than 60 years.[9] Overall, about 50% of patients with WPW develop tachyarrhythmias.

Sex-related differences in incidence

WPW pattern appears to affect the 2 sexes equally; however, WPW syndrome has been found to be more frequent in males. One study documented a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1. Another reported 1.4 cases of WPW syndrome per 1000 men and 0.9 cases per 1000. A third study found a 3.5-fold higher prevalence of WPW syndrome in men.

Race-related differences in incidence

No clear racial predilection appears to exist.

PreviousNextPrognosis

Once identified and appropriately treated, WPW syndrome is associated with an excellent prognosis, including the potential for permanent cure through RF catheter ablation.

Asymptomatic patients with only preexcitation on ECG generally have a very good prognosis. Many develop symptomatic arrhythmias over time, which can be prevented with prophylactic EPS and RF catheter ablation. Patients with a family history of SCD or significant symptoms of tachyarrhythmias or cardiac arrest have worse prognoses. However, once definitive therapy is performed, including curative ablation, the prognosis is once again excellent.

Noninvasive risk stratification can be useful if abrupt loss of preexcitation occurs with exercise or procainamide infusion.

Mortality in WPW syndrome is rare and is related to SCD. The incidence of SCD in WPW syndrome is approximately 1 in 100 symptomatic cases when followed for up to 15 years. Although relatively uncommon, SCD may be the initial presentation in as many as 4.5% of cases.

Even in patients with asymptomatic WPW, the risk of SCD is increased above that of the general population. Medical therapy with agents such as digoxin may increase this risk if the patient has AF or atrial flutter. The risk in asymptomatic patients is low and can be reduced further with prophylactic catheter ablation of the accessory pathway (EPS and RF ablation).

Other factors that appear to influence the risk of SCD are the presence of multiple bypass tracts, short AP refractory periods (

The cause of SCD in WPW syndrome is rapid conduction of AF to the ventricles via the AP, resulting in ventricular fibrillation (VF). AF develops in one fifth to one third of patients with WPW syndrome; the reasons for this and the effects of AP ablation on its development are unclear.

However, 1 study hypothesized that 2 mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of AF in patients with WPW syndrome: one is related to the AP that predisposes the atria to fibrillation, and the other is independent from the AP and is related to increased atrial vulnerability present in these individuals.[10]

According to the literature, risk factors for the development of AF in the setting of WPW syndrome include advancing age (2 peak ages for AF occurrence are recognized, one at 30 years and the other at 50 years), male gender, and prior history of syncope.[11]

Certain factors increase the likelihood of VF, including rapidly conducting APs and multiple pathways.[12] Cases have also been reported in association with esophageal studies, digoxin, and verapamil. A few reports document spontaneous VF in WPW syndrome, and SVT may degenerate into AF, thus leading to VF[13] ; however, both scenarios are rare in pediatric patients.

Morbidity may be related to rapid near syncopal or syncopal arrhythmias. Even when syncope is absent, the arrhythmia episodes may be highly symptomatic. In most patients, the SVT is well tolerated and is not life threatening. However, the potential for syncope, hemodynamically compromising rhythms, or sudden death may prevent patients with WPW syndrome from participating in competitive sports or hazardous occupations until the substrate is definitively addressed and cured by a catheter ablation procedure.

PreviousNextPatient Education

Patient education is of paramount importance in patients with WPW syndrome. This is especially true in asymptomatic young patients who have been told of their abnormal ECG results. Periodic follow-up care of such patients is necessary, along with thoughtful discussions of consideration for EPS and prophylactic catheter ablation.

Urge patients to carry a sample ECG in sinus rhythm and a medical identification bracelet in case of cardiac arrest.

Educate patients who are being treated with drug therapy thoroughly regarding the disease and the type of medications they are taking. Such patients must be taught the following:

How to recognize disease recurrenceHow to perform vagal maneuvers, when neededTo keep their follow-up appointmentsTo identify the adverse effects of antiarrhythmic drugsTo avoid competitive sportsTo learn about ablative options and the indications for ablation

Patients with WPW syndrome should also educate their family members, and their siblings should be screened for preexcitation with 12-lead ECG.

For patient education resources, see the Heart Center, as well as Supraventricular Tachycardia.

PreviousProceed to Clinical Presentation  Contributor Information and DisclosuresAuthor

Christopher R Ellis, MD, FACC  Assistant Professor of Medicine, Cardiac Electrophysiology, Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Attending Physician, Adult Cardiovascular Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center-Nashville, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System
Christopher R Ellis, MD, FACC is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Cardiology, and Heart Rhythm Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Hugh D Allen, MD  Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology and Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine
Hugh D Allen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, American Pediatric Society, American Society of Echocardiography, Society for Pediatric Research, Society of Pediatric Echocardiography, and Western Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Charles I Berul, MD  Professor of Pediatrics and Integrative Systems Biology, George Washington University School of Medicine; Chief, Division of Cardiology, Children's National Medical Center
Charles I Berul, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, Heart Rhythm Society, Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Johnson & Johnson Consulting fee Consulting

Robert Murray Hamilton, MD, MSc, FRCPC  Section Head, Electrophysiology, Senior Associate Scientist, Physiology and Experimental Medicine, Labatt Family Heart Centre; Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
Robert Murray Hamilton, MD, MSc, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: American Heart Association, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, Canadian Medical Association, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, Heart Rhythm Society, Ontario Medical Association, Pediatric Electrophysiology Society, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Shubhayan Sanatani, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Canada
Shubhayan Sanatani, MD is a member of the following medical societies: British Columbia Medical Association, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, Canadian Heart Rhythm Society, Canadian Heart Rhythm Society, Canadian Medical Association, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Russell F Kelly  MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush Medical College; Chairman of Adult Cardiology and Director of the Fellowship Program, Cook County Hospital
Russell F Kelly is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference
Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Brian Olshansky, MD  Professor of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine
Brian Olshansky, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, and Heart Rhythm Society
Disclosure: Guidant/Boston Scientific Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Medtronic Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Guidant/Boston Scientific Consulting fee Consulting; BioControl Consulting fee Consulting; Boehringer Ingelheim Consulting fee Consulting; Amarin Consulting fee Review panel membership; sanofi aventis Review panel membership

Stuart Berger, MD  Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin; Chief of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical Director of Pediatric Heart Transplant Program, Medical Director of The Heart Center, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Stuart Berger, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American Heart Association, and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Jeffrey N Rottman, MD  Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Chief, Department of Cardiology, Nashville Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Jeffrey N Rottman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Heart Association and North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE)
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

M Silvana Horenstein, MD Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical School at Houston; Medical Doctor Consultant, Legacy Department, Best Doctors, Inc

M Silvana Horenstein, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Cardiology, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

Wolff, L., Parkinson, J., White, PD. Bundle-branch block with short P-R interval in healthy young people prone to paroxysmal tachycardia. American Heart Journal. 1930/08;5:685-704.

Durrer D, Schuilenburg RM, Wellens HJ. Pre-excitation revisited. Am J Cardiol. Jun 1970;25(6):690-7. [Medline].

Calkins H, Sousa J, el-Atassi R, et al. Diagnosis and cure of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias during a single electrophysiologic test. N Engl J Med. Jun 6 1991;324(23):1612-8. [Medline].

Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, et al. Risk of malignant arrhythmias in initially symptomatic patients with wolff-Parkinson-white syndrome: results of a prospective long-term electrophysiological follow-up study. Circulation. Feb 7 2012;125(5):661-8. [Medline].

Pappone C, Santinelli V, Manguso F, Augello G, Santinelli O, Vicedomini G. A randomized study of prophylactic catheter ablation in asymptomatic patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. N Engl J Med. Nov 6 2003;349(19):1803-11. [Medline].

Sethi KK, Dhall A, Chadha DS, Garg S, Malani SK, Mathew OP. WPW and preexcitation syndromes. J Assoc Physicians India. Apr 2007;55 Suppl:10-5. [Medline].

Ehtisham J, Watkins H. Is Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome a genetic disease?. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. Nov 2005;16(11):1258-62. [Medline].

Gollob MH, Green MS, Tang AS, Gollob T, Karibe A, Ali Hassan AS. Identification of a gene responsible for familial Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. N Engl J Med. Jun 14 2001;344(24):1823-31. [Medline].

Brembilla-Perrot B, Yangni N'da O, Huttin O, Chometon F, Groben L, Christophe C. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in the elderly: clinical and electrophysiological findings. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. Jan 2008;101(1):18-22. [Medline].

Zhang Y, Wang L. Atrial vulnerability is a major mechanism of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(6):1345-7. [Medline].

Szumowski L, Walczak F, Urbanek P, Szufladowicz E, Ratajska E, Kepski R, et al. Risk factors of atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Kardiol Pol. Mar 2004;60(3):206-16; discussion 217. [Medline].

Bromberg BI, Lindsay BD, Cain ME, Cox JL. Impact of clinical history and electrophysiologic characterization of accessory pathways on management strategies to reduce sudden death among children with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. Mar 1 1996;27(3):690-5. [Medline].

Attoyan C, Haissaguerre M, Dartigues JF, Le Métayer P, Warin JF, Clémenty J. [Ventricular fibrillation in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Predictive factors]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. Jul 1994;87(7):889-97. [Medline].

Mark DG, Brady WJ, Pines JM. Preexcitation syndromes: diagnostic consideration in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. Sep 2009;27(7):878-88. [Medline].

Fengler BT, Brady WJ, Plautz CU. Atrial fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: ECG recognition and treatment in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. Jun 2007;25(5):576-83. [Medline].

Arruda, Mauricio S., et al. Development and validation of an ECG algorithm for identifying accessory pathway ablation site in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 1998/01;9:2-12.

Burnes JE, Taccardi B, Rudy Y. A noninvasive imaging modality for cardiac arrhythmias. Circulation. Oct 24 2000;102(17):2152-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Ghosh S, Avari JN, Rhee EK, Woodard PK, Rudy Y. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with preexcitation: insights from noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) and catheter mapping. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. Nov 2008;19(11):1215-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Pappone C, Manguso F, Santinelli R, Vicedomini G, Sala S, Paglino G. Radiofrequency ablation in children with asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. N Engl J Med. Sep 16 2004;351(12):1197-205. [Medline].

Sarubbi B, D'Alto M, Vergara P, Calvanese R, Mercurio B, Russo MG, et al. Electrophysiological evaluation of asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation in children and adolescents. Int J Cardiol. Feb 15 2005;98(2):207-14. [Medline].

Duszanska A, Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Streb W, Kukulski T, Kalarus Z. Evaluation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia treated by radiofrequency current ablation. Acta Cardiol. Apr 2008;63(2):221-7. [Medline].

Jackman WM, Wang XZ, Friday KJ, et al. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff- Parkinson-White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. N Engl J Med. Jun 6 1991;324(23):1605-11. [Medline].

Pappone C, Radinovic A, Santinelli V. Sudden death and ventricular preexcitation: is it necessary to treat the asymptomatic patients?. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(8):762-5. [Medline].

Gulletta S, Tsiachris D, Radinovic A, Bisceglia C, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Open Irrigated-Tip Catheter Ablation of Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome in Children and Adolescents. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. Jan 28 2013;[Medline].

 PreviousNext Classic Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiogram with short PR, QRS >120 ms, and delta wave. Preexcited atrial fibrillation. Variants of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (unusual accessory pathways). Accessory pathway potential and local AV fusion at successful RF ablation site with loss of preexcitation and return of normal HV interval. Electrocardiogram of asymptomatic 17-year-old male who was incidentally discovered to have Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern. It shows sinus rhythm with evident preexcitation. To locate accessory pathway (AP), initial 40 ms of QRS (delta wave) is evaluated. Note that delta wave is positive in I and aVL, negative in III and aVF, isoelectric in V1, and positive in rest of precordial leads. Therefore, this is likely posteroseptal AP. 12-lead electrocardiogram from asymptomatic 7-year-old boy with Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern. Delta waves are positive in I and aVL; negative in II, III, and aVF; isoelectric in V1; and positive in rest of precordial leads. This predicts posteroseptal location for accessory pathway. 12-lead electrocardiogram showing short PR interval and delta waves consistent with presence of accessory pathway. PreviousNext View Table List  Read more about Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome on MedscapeRelated Reference Topics
Lown-Ganong-Levine Syndrome
Surgical Approach to Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries
Pediatric Ventricular Fibrillation
Related News and Articles
Consensus Statement Supports Screening Asymptomatic Young Patients With WPW Patterns
Pathologic Thoracic Spine Fracture in Presence of Parkinson's Disease and Diffuse Ankylosis
Comparison of Gait in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Parkinson's Disease and Healthy Older Adults
Medscape Reference © 2011 WebMD, LLC, Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome